Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-10-2012, 10:10 PM | #51 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I'm still trying to envision what the hell this five pointed cross looked like. I think la-reid is on to something. So glad he is part of my forum.
|
01-10-2012, 10:49 PM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
|
01-10-2012, 11:14 PM | #53 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
Here are links to two large imagescans (which are too big to imagepost here) from the book, The Turin Shroud: Past, Present and Future. In each imagescan are watermarks of an image of the Vivat Crux Graffito and some explanatory text. But you have to download each one and view it offline, to see the watermarks: they don't reproduce in an online view. :frown: Alexamenos Graffito (portraying an obviously fictitious crucifixion): Link Pozzuoli Graffito (portraying a crucifixion that actually happened): Link The explanatory text that is watermarked, as best as i can reproduce: Quote:
A realistic reproduction of the Vivat Crux (which I carved from the Pozzuoli imagescan). It obviously has five points: top and bottom of the post, left and right ends of the crossarm, and endpoint of the thorn-like stake. And a photo of the actual Pozzuoli. It too has five points: bottom of post, top of a narrower section of the post (or a separate titulus post), left end and right end of the crossarm, and the end of a pointed beam, with a barely visible "peg" that is being sat upon or "ridden." |
||
01-10-2012, 11:18 PM | #54 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Ouch! You got that right. Same as with a five-pointed cross.
|
01-10-2012, 11:34 PM | #55 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
So what happens here? They spear the guy and then make these branches? I think it would look more like an x attached to a pole.
Another thing. I don't know where it is but somewhere in Jastrow's Aramaic dictionary there is a word which means crucifixion which is derived from the mast of a ship. I don't know whether this fits |
01-11-2012, 12:08 AM | #56 | |||||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On a cross, it would be nailed to the back of the post or into the top of the crossarm by its signpost / handle. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||
01-11-2012, 12:15 AM | #57 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
But on a regular cross, they nail him (maybe tie him, too) to the crossarm first and lift him up. Then they nail him to the post and spear him, not necessarily in that order. Quote:
|
||
01-11-2012, 12:15 AM | #58 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I think the five pointed cross looked like this:
and thanks to this discussion I finally found the reference to the origin of the nomen sacrum I was looking for in my discussion with Makelan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi_Rho#cite_note-1 Quote:
Also, is the Valentinian figure of 'stauros' really a disguise for Chrestos (whose name is symbolized in the cross?). This has to be the original understanding of what the cross looked like. Now the question comes - why did the Nicene Church replace this understanding? The answer (my first guess) is that it was mythical. In other words, it was an unrealistic cross. No one was crucified this way. |
|
01-11-2012, 12:37 AM | #59 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
From 350 CE:
|
01-11-2012, 12:38 AM | #60 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Before the familiar Cross was the symbol of Christianity Constantine took over the chi-rho (as a symbol of the cross?):
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|