Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-09-2003, 06:09 AM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
|
Quote:
|
|
09-09-2003, 09:50 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
Of course, your source is a documentary that you cannot name or remember clearly. So we could be here for days, I suppose. |
|
09-09-2003, 11:07 AM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Quote:
1. I vaguely remember a hypothesis H with characteristics X, Y, Z that seems valid. 2. Hey, are you talking about the hypothesis H with characteristics X, Y, Z? It is actually invalid. 3. No, I'm thinking of something else (H'), also with characteristics X, Y, Z, but it can't be the same as what you specify because what I am talking about is valid. best, Peter Kirby |
|
09-09-2003, 11:44 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 760
|
Quote:
|
|
09-09-2003, 12:31 PM | #15 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central USA
Posts: 434
|
Mt. Sinai?
Quote:
I would need to re-read the book in order to comment on any details. Namaste' Amlodhi |
|
09-09-2003, 02:44 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
|
. . . or he could just save everyone some time and take my advice and read some of the scholarly evidence which is noted in the Recommended Reading list.
--J.D. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|