![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#31 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 2,164
|
![]()
Lemur,
Do you know meaning of the word "atom"? |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York State
Posts: 144
|
![]()
I'm not defending or attacking Doron or any of his interlocutors, but I believe Doron is defining a "non-composed element" as an element that can no longer be reduced into component parts. i.e., an atom can be reduced to neutrons, electrons, and protons and they can be reduced into what not until you hit what I believe to be quarks (though at this point my knowledge in these areas ends abruptly).
However, I don't see criteria for determining same. And wouldn't bare energy be that non-composed element, or something equally as ridiculous? |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 346
|
![]() Quote:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Atom.html The definitions there don't seem to line up exactly with what you're talking about. Please, go ahead and use mathworld as a jumping off point to make it clear to me. You're trying to teach us about your system, so, by all means, teach. BTW I am on the verge of completing a M.S. in mathematics so you can assume a decent level of competence on my part when it comes to math. I'm not afraid of the techie terms. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 2,164
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|