Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-04-2007, 05:26 PM | #21 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,584
|
Quote:
Ancient Asia: King Pandukabhaya of Sri Lanka (BCE 400's) built dedicated hospitals called Sivikasotthi-Sala around his country. See Mihintale Hospital, which is the oldest documented one in history. Ancient Greece: Temples to Asclepius (BCE 300's), the god of medicine, called asclepeia where the sick would congregate to bathe and rest. The works of Hippocrates are incredibly important to the foundations of medicine. Physicians today still take the Hippocratic oath and the symbol of medicine is the Rod of Asclepius, for reference. Ancient India: King Ashoka (BCE 200's) created 18 free hospitals across the country, with all treatment costs paid for by the royal treasury. Ancient Rome: valetudinaria (BCE 100's) were military hospitals to tend to injured soldiers and slaves. The Roman army had dedicated medical programs and the resulting doctors were highly trained and specialized. Ancient China: Created hospitals in the first century CE. Persia: had the first teaching hospital in the Academy of Gundishapur around 400-600ish CE. And so on. By no means am I discounting the contribution of religious hospitals over the last 500 years. I'm just showing that the evolution of the hospital is one borne to all humanity and not Christianity. |
||
09-04-2007, 05:47 PM | #22 |
Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 13,541
|
I must say this James Hannam fellow seems like a much nicer chap than Bede!
|
09-04-2007, 06:11 PM | #23 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Does anyone know the science behind 'Holy Water' and its chemical, or supernatural composition? I am intrigued by the effectiveness of such a remedy and its failure rate. I understand this 'Water' is still in production from since 1500 years ago.
See http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ho/06/..._17.190.45.htm |
09-04-2007, 06:22 PM | #24 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
The science would involve the placebo effect. |
|
09-04-2007, 07:01 PM | #25 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
|
||
09-05-2007, 09:20 AM | #26 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
|
I wonder...
Was the purpose of this thread to convince an audience that the Catholic Church did not perpetuate ignorance and superstition down the ages? If so, then the matter of Holy Water is, I think, crucial to the discussion. (And I suppose someone might then want to mention the doctrine of Transubstantiation...) |
09-05-2007, 10:31 AM | #27 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
The Belgian anatomist Vesalius was appalled by established theories of the brain propounded by scholastic philosophers:
If by accurate and painstaking examination of the parts of the brain and from an observation of the other parts of the body, the use of which is obvious even to one little practised in dissection, some analogy were traceable, or if I could reach any probable conclusion, I would set out, if I could do so without injury to our Most Holy Religion. For who… Oh Immortal God… can fail to be astonished at the host of contemporary philosophers and even theologians who detract ridiculously from the divine and most wonderful contrivance (admirabili machinae) of man's brain. For they fabricate, like a Prometheus out of their own dreams — dreams blaspheming the Founder (Conditor) of the human fabric — some image of the brain, while they refuse to see that structure which the Maker of Nature has wrought, with incredible foresight, to accommodate it to the actions of the body. Putting before themselves the image which they have formed, which abounds in so many incongruent (inartificiosis) monstrosities, little do they heed — oh shame! — the impiety into which they lure the tender minds which they instruct, when these, no longer mere students, yearn to search out Nature's craftsmanship, and many with their own hands pry into [the parts of] man and of other creatures which are handed into their power.As Paracelsus so pithily puts it: How will it seem to you when you will have to accept my philosophy and you will shit on your Pliny and Aristotle and piss on your Albertus [Magnus], Thomas [Aquinas], Scotus, etc., and when you will say: they lie beautifully and subtly .... How will it seem to you when I shall mess up your heaven and the [constellation of the] Dragon shall gobble up your Avicenna and your Galen?Quotations from H.G. Koenigsberger, "Science and religion in early modern Europe." In Political Symbolism in Modern Europe: essays in honor of George L. Mosse (or via: amazon.co.uk) By Seymour. Drescher, George Lachmann Mosse, David Warren. Sabean, Allan Sharlin. Limited preview available in Google books. |
09-05-2007, 11:01 AM | #28 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
All the best, Roger Pearse |
||
09-05-2007, 11:46 AM | #29 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,460
|
Getting back to dissection...
From the OP by James Hannam:
Quote:
This was because the Church had banned dissection (at least in Florence), except for once a year under special observation. Now I know that "The Agony and the Ecstacy" was fiction set in the Renaissance, which is centuries later than the time in question. I also realize that "the Church" is not homogenous over all times and all of Europe. However, am I to believe that the Church allowed (or even encouraged?) dissection at one time, but then turned around and banned it later? |
|
09-05-2007, 03:10 PM | #30 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,584
|
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|