FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2011, 05:05 PM   #51
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by hjalti View Post
So, why is Hermann Detering a hack?
He believes that every existing Pauline letter is a complete forgery, a position that stands against both the evidence and the positions of every other historian/scholar.
You are making ERRONEOUS claims about the "evidence" for the PAULINE letters.

You KNOW that there is NO credible external historical evidence to CORROBORATE a SINGLE PAULINE letter yet you CONTINUE to promote PROPAGANDA.

You KNOW that the CHURCH itself CLAIMED "PAUL" was AWARE of gLuke and that "PAUL" died under NERO.

Do you see the PROBLEM?

Not even the Church can SHOW that the PAULINE writings are AUTHENTIC.

Stop your nonsense.

There is just NO external EVIDENCE from antiquity that can SHOW an actual person who lived BEFORE the Fall of the Temple wrote a single letter to any Church about a character called Jesus, the END OF THE LAW, to whom every KNEE SHOULD BOW with the ABILITY to REMIT SINS by his own resurrection.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 06:49 AM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
You can download a free Kindle reader from Amazon that will work on your PC. You don't need an actual Kindle.
Ah. Thank you very much.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 04:15 PM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Ehrman has briefly touched upon the HJ controversy in other books and his evidence has been less than impressive. Perhaps he will come up with something new but logic dictates against it.

If there was anything new it would have already been utilized by the jesus freaks.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 05:44 PM   #54
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 104
Default

Ehrman stated, it is on youtube, that no serious historian believes that Jesus is not historical. When ever I hear that piece of close minded circular reasoning repeated like a mantra from one believer to the next my expectations of their presentation of actual historical evidence drops.
dogsgod is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 07:55 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
that no serious historian believes that Jesus is not historical.

I suspect that is because the jesus club refuses to consider anyone a 'serious historian' who rejects their godboy. It is a self-serving doctrine.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 08:57 PM   #56
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

From what-do-biblical-scholars-make-of-the-resurrection:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ehrman
Historians, of course, have no difficulty whatsoever speaking about the belief in Jesus’ resurrection, since this is a matter of public record. For it is a historical fact that some of Jesus’ followers came to believe that he had been raised from the dead soon after his execution. (p. 81)


According to Ehrman we may rely upon "the historical fact that some of Jesus’ followers came to believe that he had been raised from the dead soon after his execution".

I would like to ask Ehrman if he thinks that Gandalf the Grey rose out of the pit in Moria after slaying the Balrog, to become Gandalf the White. It is certain that many of Gandalf's followers believed he had risen from death. This "public record" stuff is juvenile thinking. The Letter of Jesus to Agbra was on public record. The Testimonium Flavianum is on public record. As far as the unwashed public are concerned, they do understand forgery and its role in society. Despite his books, I cannot say the same thing about Ehrman. He might be able to identify and discuss forgery, but does he really understand it? I dont think so. The evidence seems to indicate that no matter how bright Ehrman may be in the field of "Biblical History", he deals with forgery in an extremely nieve way.

You never know, Ehman might shoot himself in the foot with this new ebook.

Quote:
Quote:
There are a lot of atheists on the Internet who believe that Jesus never existed..."

He interrupted me, "That will be my next book."
I was filled with joy. I could hardly believe it.
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-14-2011, 04:06 AM   #57
avi
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
It is quite possible that Pamphilus edited Contra Celsum so as to avoid ideas he felt to be unsound, but a/ there is IIUC no positive evidence whatever that he did so, and b/ there is no guarantee that such hypothetical efforts would have made Contra Celsum more acceptable to post-Nicene orthodoxy, (conceivably the reverse).
Morning Andrew,
Thanks for this comment about Pamphilus.
To my untrained, and uneducated eye, however, it would appear that what little we know about Pamphilus, today, is derived from writings of Photius, as interpreted by Rufinus, when seen through the eyes of the latter's attacker, Jerome, which seems to bring us full circle back to David's post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley
See how complicated it really is to "know" exactly what happens in the past?
At the heart of this Pamphilus/Photius/Rufinus/Jerome controversy, is Origen. Haha.
Was he this, or that, or something else entirely?

Is it not, ultimately simply a question of faith?

Do we accept Jerome, or Rufinus? How do we know which of the 3rd, 4th and 5th century authors to believe? Do we have genuine, unredacted manuscript evidence from any of them?

avi
avi is offline  
Old 03-14-2011, 04:11 AM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
You never know, Ehman might shoot himself in the foot with this new ebook.
Well now, if Ehrman runs into difficulties he can always call up the services of that grand master of mythicism debunking. I’m sure he would be willing to help Ehrman out.....Perhaps we should send him this link......

Quote:
http://armariummagnus.blogspot.com/2...85058977499970

Tim O'Neill said...

I think reviewing a book that claims Jesus never existed is definitely worthwhile, especially when it is being trumpeted as "the best 'capsule summary' of the mythist case I've ever encountered" by prominent myther Earl Doherty and boosted by Richard Carrier.

I didn't pay much attention to these people until a few years ago, since I regarded mythers as being kooks in the same category as UFO nuts. But in recent years the myther position has gained real traction in the atheist community, which is notoriously illiterate when it comes to the study of history.

And if anyone is going to debunk this stuff it's someone like me. Firstly I have a strong grasp of the material, secondly I have (unfortunately) a clear understanding of myther arguments and thirdly, I'm an atheist, so they can't use the "you're just saying that because you're a Christian" counter-argument on me.

Except they still try to. I recently looked at the key-words people use to get to this blog and found someone had come here by typing "Tim O'Neill"+"is really a Christian" into Google. Nice try, idiot.
---------------------------
Less interesting but perhaps more fun, is a slender self-published tome that hit my desk a couple of weeks ago. It glories in the title Nailed: Ten Christian Myths That Show Jesus Never Existed at All and is by one David Fitzgerald. It's actually Fitzgerald's contribution to an odd little competition held by some of the usual suspects from the online "Jesus Never Existed" brigade. It came runner up last year, apparently, but thanks to the wonders of print-on-demand online publishing services ("helping kooks get into print for over five years!") befuddled clowns and frothing fanatics can now purchase it on Amazon etc and have their prejudices and misconceptions gently stroked. I suspect that review won't be kindly.
(my bolding)
maryhelena is offline  
Old 03-14-2011, 04:59 AM   #59
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Hi maryhelena,

Thanks for posting this reference to this blog. I sent the owner a message asking for his opinion on this link: The vacuum of evidence for pre-4th century Christianity.

I have no idea what O'Neil's position is, although I noted he appears to think that some of the letters of Paul are genuine, unlike Detering. I'd also like to see Ehrman's response, or anyone on this discussion board, to this article, written by a long standing British archaeologist.

Best wishes,



Pete



Quote:
Originally Posted by maryhelena View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
You never know, Ehman might shoot himself in the foot with this new ebook.
Well now, if Ehrman runs into difficulties he can always call up the services of that grand master of mythicism debunking. I’m sure he would be willing to help Ehrman out.....Perhaps we should send him this link......

Quote:
http://armariummagnus.blogspot.com/2...85058977499970

Tim O'Neill said...

I think reviewing a book that claims Jesus never existed is definitely worthwhile, especially when it is being trumpeted as "the best 'capsule summary' of the mythist case I've ever encountered" by prominent myther Earl Doherty and boosted by Richard Carrier.

I didn't pay much attention to these people until a few years ago, since I regarded mythers as being kooks in the same category as UFO nuts. But in recent years the myther position has gained real traction in the atheist community, which is notoriously illiterate when it comes to the study of history.

And if anyone is going to debunk this stuff it's someone like me. Firstly I have a strong grasp of the material, secondly I have (unfortunately) a clear understanding of myther arguments and thirdly, I'm an atheist, so they can't use the "you're just saying that because you're a Christian" counter-argument on me.

Except they still try to. I recently looked at the key-words people use to get to this blog and found someone had come here by typing "Tim O'Neill"+"is really a Christian" into Google. Nice try, idiot.
---------------------------
Less interesting but perhaps more fun, is a slender self-published tome that hit my desk a couple of weeks ago. It glories in the title Nailed: Ten Christian Myths That Show Jesus Never Existed at All and is by one David Fitzgerald. It's actually Fitzgerald's contribution to an odd little competition held by some of the usual suspects from the online "Jesus Never Existed" brigade. It came runner up last year, apparently, but thanks to the wonders of print-on-demand online publishing services ("helping kooks get into print for over five years!") befuddled clowns and frothing fanatics can now purchase it on Amazon etc and have their prejudices and misconceptions gently stroked. I suspect that review won't be kindly.
(my bolding)
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-14-2011, 06:51 AM   #60
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Just noted ApostateAbe has gone self-ban.
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.