FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2009, 10:51 AM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed
This should help explain why there is no written record of a global flood in Egypt. It’s because Egypt wasn’t inhabited until after the flood and tower of Babel.
What flood are you referring to, and what evidence do you have that it occurred?

The world wide deluge from the Bible in which evidences can be seen through out the world where the same sediments cover the whole world, we can look at the Grand Canyon and see the different laywers of sediment put down by the flood, and we can see marine fossiles on every mountain over the earth.
Free Indeed is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 10:52 AM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Underseer View Post
Here's what I don't understand about the Tower of Babel story: if building a tall building was enough to incur God's wrath, why wasn't there even greater punishment meted out to mankind once we started building things far taller than the Tower of Babel was (there are limits to how tall it could have been, because it didn't have a steel skeleton like modern skyscrapers). For that matter, why didn't we get a more severe punishment when we started sending men into space and even the moon? If the Tower of Babel was presumptuous of man, sending astronauts above the atmosphere would have been far more presumptuous.
We could have done a lot more if God didn't confuse our languages, we have been busy fighting each other.
Free Indeed is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 10:52 AM   #53
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, eh
Posts: 42,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed View Post

The world wide deluge from the Bible in which evidences can be seen through out the world where the same sediments cover the whole world, we can look at the Grand Canyon and see the different laywers of sediment put down by the flood, and we can see marine fossiles on every mountain over the earth.
See, now we know you're just kidding. You overdid it.
Tom Sawyer is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 10:54 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith&Co. View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed View Post
Maybe they were bored.
You know, right up until this post, i wasn't entirely sure if you were having everyone on. But you are.

You're pretending to believe that they could simultaneously remember direct intervention from the One True God so they build towers, but not offensive towers, but also play around with idolatry, false deities and polytheism out of boredom.

That's absurdist beyond the realm of even Dali or Bunuel. Or talking out your ass.
That was just a lighthearted answer. I didn't think people really needed to have an explanation on why man does things.
Free Indeed is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 10:58 AM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed View Post

We can see that Genesis 10 gives the account of the three sons of Noah, and their families. Genesis 11 doesn't claim to give that account, it gives the account of when the people migrated east they decided to build a tower. I see no conflict.

This is similar to the claim that some make that there are two accounts of creation in Genesis 1 and 2, but it is actually a more detailed account of the creation of man.
I suggested conflict with what you claimed vs. what the Bible say, not within the Bible...jeeze, get a clue!

Again, you made the claim that all humans were in Shinar. Please back it up. Where is that stated clearly in your Bible.

I believe what I said was in Shinar or Mesopotamia which is a wider area around Shinar which includes Babylonia. That is the cradle of life and even modern day scientists say we came from there which confirms the good Book.
Free Indeed is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 11:00 AM   #56
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, eh
Posts: 42,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed View Post

I believe what I said was in Shinar or Mesopotamia which is a wider area around Shinar which includes Babylonia. That is the cradle of life and even modern day scientists say we came from there which confirms the good Book.
Yes, but modern day scientists bias their results based on what their preceonceived notions tell them they want to find, so they can't be relied upon. Isn't that how it works?
Tom Sawyer is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 11:01 AM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed
I believe what I said was in Shinar or Mesopotamia which is a wider area around Shinar which includes Babylonia. That is the cradle of life and even modern day scientists say we came from there which confirms the good Book.
Name one scientist (apologists masquerading as scientists don't count) who states humanity came from Mesopotamia.
Demigawd is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 11:04 AM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed View Post

I believe what I said was in Shinar or Mesopotamia which is a wider area around Shinar which includes Babylonia. That is the cradle of life and even modern day scientists say we came from there which confirms the good Book.
Yes, but modern day scientists bias their results based on what their preceonceived notions tell them they want to find, so they can't be relied upon. Isn't that how it works?
Well we can't rely on their dating methods completely but anything younger than 4000 years we can rely on them pretty much, except for when they make conclusions based on non-belief.
Free Indeed is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 11:07 AM   #59
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, eh
Posts: 42,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer View Post

Yes, but modern day scientists bias their results based on what their preceonceived notions tell them they want to find, so they can't be relied upon. Isn't that how it works?
Well we can't rely on their dating methods completely but anything younger than 4000 years we can rely on them pretty much, except for when they make conclusions based on non-belief.
So, we can't rely on them except when what they say conforms to the Bible. Kind of sucks to have had all those scientists waste their time in universities when they could have just gone to Bible study class.
Tom Sawyer is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 11:09 AM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Indeed View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer View Post

Yes, but modern day scientists bias their results based on what their preceonceived notions tell them they want to find, so they can't be relied upon. Isn't that how it works?
Well we can't rely on their dating methods completely but anything younger than 4000 years we can rely on them pretty much, except for when they make conclusions based on non-belief.
Varves
show_no_mercy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:05 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.