FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

View Poll Results: The Bible identifies Jesus as?
God 0 0%
man 13 46.43%
both God and man 12 42.86%
neither God or man but something in between 3 10.71%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-19-2006, 09:14 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 13,161
Default

People really need to read the OP before posting.
Splarnst is offline  
Old 01-19-2006, 09:18 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 5,047
Lightbulb

My reading of the bible has him as both God and man.

My view of that is that it is incoherent. :huh:
Ronin is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 03:04 AM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central PA, USA
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul Invictus
I'm not sure why the OP didn't list "fictional character" as an option. Since it's not and we assume he existed, then he would exclusively human.
Hi Soul Invictus,

Thanks for the response. This thread is about what the Bible tells us about the identity of Jesus. I did not include 'fictional character' as an option because nobody I know interprets any verse of scripture that way. Your conclusion that Jesus would be exclusively human appears to be your own opinion and not an interpretation of any Bible verse.

Thanks,
StarCross
StarCross is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 04:48 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool Renard the Fox

Quote:
Originally Posted by StarCross
Thanks for the response. This thread is about what the Bible tells us about the identity of Jesus. I did not include 'fictional character' as an option because nobody I know interprets any verse of scripture that way. Your conclusion that Jesus would be exclusively human appears to be your own opinion and not an interpretation of any Bible verse.
But Sir Cross, if you were to read one of AEsop's fables about Renard the Fox, how would you answer the same question? What does the fable tell us Renard is?

You might answer "he's a Fox", but we all know that Foxes don't talk. You might say "he's an allegory for Man", but that still doesn't really answer the question well. Saying that Renard is a fictional character is also quite accurate, even if it's an incomplete part of the story.

To me, the Bible identifies Jesus as Man, as God, as something else, all at at the same time. Together, that implies that he is a character in a story who is allowed to be anything the author wants. So, I consider it quite accurate to say that the Bible tells us that Jesus is a fictional character.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 05:44 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

The problem with the question asked in the OP is that it assumes that the bible presents a single unified definition of what he is. Clearly one could pick all of the answers in the poll and find biblical support for each one. The poll can therefore not be answered unless an option named, "All of the above" is added.

Julian
Julian is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 07:13 AM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StarCross
Hi Soul Invictus,
I did not include 'fictional character' as an option because nobody I know interprets any verse of scripture that way. Your conclusion that Jesus would be exclusively human appears to be your own opinion and not an interpretation of any Bible verse.

Thanks,
StarCross
And I disagree. I've met many Christians that have varying positions on the topic based on their interpretation of the Bible.
Soul Invictus is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 09:25 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian
The problem with the question asked in the OP is that it assumes that the bible presents a single unified definition of what he is. Clearly one could pick all of the answers in the poll and find biblical support for each one. The poll can therefore not be answered unless an option named, "All of the above" is added.
I agree. That's the one I would have picked.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 03:04 PM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central PA, USA
Posts: 25
Default

Hello Soul Invictus,

Quote:
Originally Posted by StarCross
This thread is about what the Bible tells us about the identity of Jesus. I did not include 'fictional character' as an option because nobody I know interprets any verse of scripture that way. Your conclusion that Jesus would be exclusively human appears to be your own opinion and not an interpretation of any Bible verse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul Invictus
And I disagree. I've met many Christians that have varying positions on the topic based on their interpretation of the Bible.
What is it you disagree with? That your conclusion about Jesus is not your interpretation of scripture or that no verse of scripture is interpreted as claiming that Jesus is fictional?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul Invictus
I'm not sure why the OP didn't list "fictional character" as an option. Since it's not and we assume he existed, then he would exclusively human.
Since you quoted no scripture and made no attempt to even imply that you were interpreting any scripture at all, I simply assumed you formed an opinion of Jesus based on something else. If I am mistaken then I apologize.

Thanks
StarCross
StarCross is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 09:59 PM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default

Howdy StarCross,

Here's my responses to your questions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StarCross
Hello Soul Invictus,

What is it you disagree with? That your conclusion about Jesus is not your interpretation of scripture or that no verse of scripture is interpreted as claiming that Jesus is fictional?
I should have only quoted a portion of your response. This was to address your comment

Quote:
Your conclusion that Jesus would be exclusively human appears to be your own opinion and not an interpretation of any Bible verse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starcross
Since you quoted no scripture and made no attempt to even imply that you were interpreting any scripture at all, I simply assumed you formed an opinion of Jesus based on something else. If I am mistaken then I apologize.
No problem. One scripture that comes to mind is 1 Tim.2:5

Quote:
"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus."
I'm not readily sure of the apologetics for this one (which I'm sure are some) but this verse does a few things.

1) It establishes that there is one God
2) It makes a distinction that God is a separate type of entity from a man (by virtue of a connecting mediator)
3) Jesus is a man
Soul Invictus is offline  
Old 01-20-2006, 10:14 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ---
Posts: 10,496
Default

How many verses make that indication, though?
MonCapitan2002 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.