FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-19-2009, 09:52 AM   #101
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post

The thousands of digs have not turned up the grave of David or any of the actual houses that he lived in, or buildings dedicated to him, or any poems that he wrote or anybody wrote about him, or the clothes that he wore or any objects that he owned.
The issue with this find concerns whether david was a myth [as per many scholars' baseless conclusions on evdence even pre-dating this find] or a historical figure. Your assumptions are not credible, nor your alligning it with Goliat and a grave relating to a 3000 year figure, in a land which was in constant invasions and destructions. Please show us instead an equivalent affirmation of any other fgure from such an ancient period - you may use any part of the world you like.

The limiting this find to three letters is also not credible; in fact the find shows inter-connective details with historical events, and this would not even require those figures or the reference to David. However, we have also other evidences which allign with David and Solomon in hard copy coins and other artifacts. David is also evidenced by a long thread of writings, none of which have ever been disputed as dis-historical.

Cyclical inclinations imposed on history lead nowhere. My view is there is far more proof for 3000 year David than more recent figures like Buddha, Jesus or Mohammed; and equally, there is far more evidence David wrote the psalms than those figures can be connected to what is ascribed to them as their own writings. There is more evidence of the trial conducted on David by the Prophet Nathan, than the trial mentioned in the Gospels concerning Jesus; there is more evidence that the Prophet Samuel annointed David as King than the followers of Mohammed appointing him a Prophet; there is more evidence of the entire real life family members of David, as well as his biological lineage, than we have for Buddha, Jesus or Mohammed.

The truth is we are within a realm which says David and Moses were Muslim [intelligently embellished as 'belief', but which transcends all historicity]; and there are two gaping discrepencies in the Gospel claims of Jesus lineage with this same figure. IOW, European Christianity and Islam have a jewish problem - and this filters down to their scholars and a host of media and enclyclopedia - these are being exposed continuously. We saw the debacle with the scrolls - had it not been retrieved into Israeli hands, we'd probably not have any access to these writings today - or they would have been destroyed and paste and copy editions only made available; this is also what has occured with the Flavius Josephus writings. And there are vital reasons to keep it that way.

I invite your preamble at the top if you are saying David was a myth or not first - then second this why this find is not conclusive in that regard.
Interestingly enough, but not suprisngly, you completely sidestepped the fact that DECADES of digs in the areas mentioned in OT have yielded nothing...no evidence of this 'great' nation, a 40 year sojourn in the dessert, thousands of slain soldiers from all of these so called wars, ruins of vast cities or towns, burial sites, writings....NOTHING. Your entire position is based on something written 2000 years after the fact...unless you can present evidence of anything other then an ORAL TRADITION that shows a collection of Hebrew writings before the Septaugint 'translation'.
Ohene is offline  
Old 03-19-2009, 10:16 AM   #102
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post

Me too! That's the problem with trying to prove a negative. Hence, the burden of proof lies upon positive claims. Please explain how it would even be theoretically possibly to disprove that Jesus walked on water.

Is there *any* reasonable evidence you would accept to disprove that? Why do you start by assuming it's true?



Declares how? Via the book you worship and pretend to be the work of a god?

Circular my friend. Book makes claims about a god. Book makes claims about itself. Therefor book's claims about god are true?



Woe to all idiots who do not bow down before the ridiculous ancient tribal god of some po-dunk desert civilization who's priests wrote a stupid book to record their legal system!!! Oh woe!!!

Dude. I don't believe. I am immune to your absurd implied threats.



I can only assume this gibberish is the equivalent of a secret handshake in your cult.

While none can PROVE the Creator, there is only one document that says so [Hebrew bible]; many say otherwise, namely they can prove and they know, they saw, they touched, they witnessed, they heard; or alternatively they affirm that no creator exists; only the former Hebrew edition appears right imperically. Here, it is not a violation of anyone's sensebilities, nor their science or math, to the premise the creator is indescribable, indefinable and inequatable with any thing within creation. The Hebrew paradisgms appear to me proven, manifest, blatant and in allignment with reality. Your added and subtracted embellishments are a distortion.
Actually, Egyptians were very familiar with the Creator. They imagined him long before they ever came into conact with Hebrews. Contrary to mainstream television, ancient Egypt religion was actually Henothesim. Belief in a supreme being who created everything...including other gods. Here is an example of Egyptian writings that predate Hebrew:

• God is One and alone, none other existeth with Him; God is the One, the One Who hath made all things.
• God is a spirit, a hidden spirit, the spirit of spirits, the great spirit of the Egyptians, the divine spirit.
• God is from the beginning, and He hath been from the beginning, and He hath been from the beginning; He hath existed from of old and was when nothing else had being. He existed when nothing else existed, and what existeth He created after He had come into being. He is the father of beginnings.
• God is the eternal One, He is eternal and infinite; and endureth for ever and aye; He hath endured for countless ages, and He shall endure to all eternity.
• God is the hidden Being, and none hath known his form. No man that been able to seek out His likeness; He is hidden from gods and men, and he is a mystery unto His creatures.
• No man knoweth how to know him. His name remaineth hidden; His name is a mystery unto His children. His names are innumerable, they are manifold and none knoweth their number.
• God is truth, and he liveth by truth, and He feedeth thereon. He is the King of truth, he resteth upon truth, He fashioneth truth, and He executeth truth throughout all the world.
• God is life and through him only man liveth. He giveth life to man, and he breatheth the breath of life into his nostrils.
• God is the father and mother, father of fathers, and the mother of mothers. He begetteth, but was never begotten; He produced Himself. He createth, be was never createth: He is the maker of His own form, and the fashioner of His own body.
• God Himself is existence, He liveth in all thing, and liveth upon all things. He endureth without increase or diminution, He mutiplieth Himself millions of times, he possesseth multitudes of forms and multitudes and members.
• God had made the universe, and he hath created all that is therein: He is the Creator of what is in this world, or what was, of what is, and of what shall be. He is the Creator of the world, and it was He Who fashioned it with His hands before there was any beginning; and He established it which went forth from him. He is the Creator of the heavens, and the earth, and the deep; the Creator of the heavens and the earth and the deep and the waters, and the mountains. God stretcheth out the heavens and founded the earth. What his heart conceived came to pass straightway, and when He had spoken His word came to pass, and it shall endure for ever.
• God is the father of gods, and the father of the father of all deities. He made his voice to sound, and the deities came into being, and the gods sprangs into existence after He had spoken with his mouth.

re: Wallis Budge and H. Brugsch
Ohene is offline  
Old 03-19-2009, 04:50 PM   #103
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post

No. My interpretation is correct, unless the Hebrew god was given credit for bringing all of mankind out of slavery from Egypt (including the Egyptians)

That's exactly what happened. The quest for Liberty and inalienable human rights was established at this juncture. This is what the exodus represents - not some FX miracles.

Sadly for you, two hundred years of archaeological work in Egypt has not brought forth a single shred of evidence for an exodus. Moreover, extensive excavation in Palestine has shown that there was no conquest by Joshua or any other heavenly stormtrooper, either. Some scholars are still arguing about a United Monarchy under "David" but that also seems to be falling by the wayside.

I suggest you read some modern archaeology and put the bible away. It is not helping you.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 03-21-2009, 09:43 PM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post


That's exactly what happened. The quest for Liberty and inalienable human rights was established at this juncture. This is what the exodus represents - not some FX miracles.

Sadly for you, two hundred years of archaeological work in Egypt has not brought forth a single shred of evidence for an exodus.
Which other war between Egypt in that period is evidential?

Quote:

Moreover, extensive excavation in Palestine has shown that there was no conquest by Joshua or any other heavenly stormtrooper, either.
There was no country called Palestine when Joshua entered canaan. And there is no question the Israelites were in Canaan till 586 BCE, as a sovereign state, and after a displacement for 70 years via babylon, a soveriegn state again till 70 CE.

Except for stone ethchings, proofs become very scarce for all of history pre-3000 years ago, and compoundingly so for each century before that time.

Quote:
Some scholars are still arguing about a United Monarchy under "David" but that also seems to be falling by the wayside.

I suggest you read some modern archaeology and put the bible away. It is not helping you.
I am only discussing archeological back-up for anything in any scriptures. I do read them. You have disregarded a host of archeological evidences and zoomed into what no archeological evidence exists for almost all areas pre-3,200 years ago.


There may not be proof for Moses - but there is more evidence of him than even Jesus or Mohammed. There also evidence for Abraham, who predates Israel - his great grand son Joseph was a viceroy in Egypt, and we have the burial of Abraham and his wife, with two generations down all in Hebron today. We also have the burial sites of Aaron and Miriam [Moses' bilogical brother and sister], and of Joseph - who asked that his bones be taken to his own land. The dead sea scrolls package cntains al the Mosaic books, which is backed by subsequent prophetic books which allign with the entire history of Israel in periodical 100 year blocks apart for 3000 years. I know of no other area where such a host of evidences exist.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 03-21-2009, 09:54 PM   #105
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohene View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post


While none can PROVE the Creator, there is only one document that says so [Hebrew bible]; many say otherwise, namely they can prove and they know, they saw, they touched, they witnessed, they heard; or alternatively they affirm that no creator exists; only the former Hebrew edition appears right imperically. Here, it is not a violation of anyone's sensebilities, nor their science or math, to the premise the creator is indescribable, indefinable and inequatable with any thing within creation. The Hebrew paradisgms appear to me proven, manifest, blatant and in allignment with reality. Your added and subtracted embellishments are a distortion.
Actually, Egyptians were very familiar with the Creator. They imagined him long before they ever came into conact with Hebrews. Contrary to mainstream television, ancient Egypt religion was actually Henothesim. Belief in a supreme being who created everything...including other gods. Here is an example of Egyptian writings that predate Hebrew:

• God is One and alone, none other existeth with Him; God is the One, the One Who hath made all things.
• God is a spirit, a hidden spirit, the spirit of spirits, the great spirit of the Egyptians, the divine spirit.
• God is from the beginning, and He hath been from the beginning, and He hath been from the beginning; He hath existed from of old and was when nothing else had being. He existed when nothing else existed, and what existeth He created after He had come into being. He is the father of beginnings.
• God is the eternal One, He is eternal and infinite; and endureth for ever and aye; He hath endured for countless ages, and He shall endure to all eternity.
• God is the hidden Being, and none hath known his form. No man that been able to seek out His likeness; He is hidden from gods and men, and he is a mystery unto His creatures.
• No man knoweth how to know him. His name remaineth hidden; His name is a mystery unto His children. His names are innumerable, they are manifold and none knoweth their number.
• God is truth, and he liveth by truth, and He feedeth thereon. He is the King of truth, he resteth upon truth, He fashioneth truth, and He executeth truth throughout all the world.
• God is life and through him only man liveth. He giveth life to man, and he breatheth the breath of life into his nostrils.
• God is the father and mother, father of fathers, and the mother of mothers. He begetteth, but was never begotten; He produced Himself. He createth, be was never createth: He is the maker of His own form, and the fashioner of His own body.
• God Himself is existence, He liveth in all thing, and liveth upon all things. He endureth without increase or diminution, He mutiplieth Himself millions of times, he possesseth multitudes of forms and multitudes and members.
• God had made the universe, and he hath created all that is therein: He is the Creator of what is in this world, or what was, of what is, and of what shall be. He is the Creator of the world, and it was He Who fashioned it with His hands before there was any beginning; and He established it which went forth from him. He is the Creator of the heavens, and the earth, and the deep; the Creator of the heavens and the earth and the deep and the waters, and the mountains. God stretcheth out the heavens and founded the earth. What his heart conceived came to pass straightway, and when He had spoken His word came to pass, and it shall endure for ever.
• God is the father of gods, and the father of the father of all deities. He made his voice to sound, and the deities came into being, and the gods sprangs into existence after He had spoken with his mouth.

re: Wallis Budge and H. Brugsch

IMHO< all humans are aware of the Creator, as well as all life forms - it is an inherent trait, and not limited to any one group. It appears that in ancient times, the very quest of re-connecting with the Creator, after a period of absence post-adam, the people started to make their own representations, via deities and reflections of nations, derived from storms, thunder and earthquakes [Egypt, Babylon, Greece] - which were seen as angry and happy Gods. Many nations exploited this trait by proclaiming humans as divine - as with Egypt and Rome, and enslaved others and made them subserviant; sorcery and occultism also flourished by such exploitation.


Metaphorically, the Tower of babel, and that man climbs mountain peaks for nothing - are marks of this re-connection syndrome.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 03-21-2009, 09:57 PM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohene View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

The issue with this find concerns whether david was a myth [as per many scholars' baseless conclusions on evdence even pre-dating this find] or a historical figure. Your assumptions are not credible, nor your alligning it with Goliat and a grave relating to a 3000 year figure, in a land which was in constant invasions and destructions. Please show us instead an equivalent affirmation of any other fgure from such an ancient period - you may use any part of the world you like.

The limiting this find to three letters is also not credible; in fact the find shows inter-connective details with historical events, and this would not even require those figures or the reference to David. However, we have also other evidences which allign with David and Solomon in hard copy coins and other artifacts. David is also evidenced by a long thread of writings, none of which have ever been disputed as dis-historical.

Cyclical inclinations imposed on history lead nowhere. My view is there is far more proof for 3000 year David than more recent figures like Buddha, Jesus or Mohammed; and equally, there is far more evidence David wrote the psalms than those figures can be connected to what is ascribed to them as their own writings. There is more evidence of the trial conducted on David by the Prophet Nathan, than the trial mentioned in the Gospels concerning Jesus; there is more evidence that the Prophet Samuel annointed David as King than the followers of Mohammed appointing him a Prophet; there is more evidence of the entire real life family members of David, as well as his biological lineage, than we have for Buddha, Jesus or Mohammed.

The truth is we are within a realm which says David and Moses were Muslim [intelligently embellished as 'belief', but which transcends all historicity]; and there are two gaping discrepencies in the Gospel claims of Jesus lineage with this same figure. IOW, European Christianity and Islam have a jewish problem - and this filters down to their scholars and a host of media and enclyclopedia - these are being exposed continuously. We saw the debacle with the scrolls - had it not been retrieved into Israeli hands, we'd probably not have any access to these writings today - or they would have been destroyed and paste and copy editions only made available; this is also what has occured with the Flavius Josephus writings. And there are vital reasons to keep it that way.

I invite your preamble at the top if you are saying David was a myth or not first - then second this why this find is not conclusive in that regard.
Interestingly enough, but not suprisngly, you completely sidestepped the fact that DECADES of digs in the areas mentioned in OT have yielded nothing...no evidence of this 'great' nation, a 40 year sojourn in the dessert, thousands of slain soldiers from all of these so called wars, ruins of vast cities or towns, burial sites, writings....NOTHING. Your entire position is based on something written 2000 years after the fact...unless you can present evidence of anything other then an ORAL TRADITION that shows a collection of Hebrew writings before the Septaugint 'translation'.
More interesting is whether the oral or written laws have merit for humanity, in comparison of other laws. Ultimately, that is all that matters.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 11:12 AM   #107
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohene View Post

Actually, Egyptians were very familiar with the Creator. They imagined him long before they ever came into conact with Hebrews. Contrary to mainstream television, ancient Egypt religion was actually Henothesim. Belief in a supreme being who created everything...including other gods. Here is an example of Egyptian writings that predate Hebrew:

• God is One and alone, none other existeth with Him; God is the One, the One Who hath made all things.
• God is a spirit, a hidden spirit, the spirit of spirits, the great spirit of the Egyptians, the divine spirit.
• God is from the beginning, and He hath been from the beginning, and He hath been from the beginning; He hath existed from of old and was when nothing else had being. He existed when nothing else existed, and what existeth He created after He had come into being. He is the father of beginnings.
• God is the eternal One, He is eternal and infinite; and endureth for ever and aye; He hath endured for countless ages, and He shall endure to all eternity.
• God is the hidden Being, and none hath known his form. No man that been able to seek out His likeness; He is hidden from gods and men, and he is a mystery unto His creatures.
• No man knoweth how to know him. His name remaineth hidden; His name is a mystery unto His children. His names are innumerable, they are manifold and none knoweth their number.
• God is truth, and he liveth by truth, and He feedeth thereon. He is the King of truth, he resteth upon truth, He fashioneth truth, and He executeth truth throughout all the world.
• God is life and through him only man liveth. He giveth life to man, and he breatheth the breath of life into his nostrils.
• God is the father and mother, father of fathers, and the mother of mothers. He begetteth, but was never begotten; He produced Himself. He createth, be was never createth: He is the maker of His own form, and the fashioner of His own body.
• God Himself is existence, He liveth in all thing, and liveth upon all things. He endureth without increase or diminution, He mutiplieth Himself millions of times, he possesseth multitudes of forms and multitudes and members.
• God had made the universe, and he hath created all that is therein: He is the Creator of what is in this world, or what was, of what is, and of what shall be. He is the Creator of the world, and it was He Who fashioned it with His hands before there was any beginning; and He established it which went forth from him. He is the Creator of the heavens, and the earth, and the deep; the Creator of the heavens and the earth and the deep and the waters, and the mountains. God stretcheth out the heavens and founded the earth. What his heart conceived came to pass straightway, and when He had spoken His word came to pass, and it shall endure for ever.
• God is the father of gods, and the father of the father of all deities. He made his voice to sound, and the deities came into being, and the gods sprangs into existence after He had spoken with his mouth.

re: Wallis Budge and H. Brugsch

IMHO< all humans are aware of the Creator, as well as all life forms - it is an inherent trait, and not limited to any one group. It appears that in ancient times, the very quest of re-connecting with the Creator, after a period of absence post-adam, the people started to make their own representations, via deities and reflections of nations, derived from storms, thunder and earthquakes [Egypt, Babylon, Greece] - which were seen as angry and happy Gods. Many nations exploited this trait by proclaiming humans as divine - as with Egypt and Rome, and enslaved others and made them subserviant; sorcery and occultism also flourished by such exploitation.


Metaphorically, the Tower of babel, and that man climbs mountain peaks for nothing - are marks of this re-connection syndrome.
Re-connecting? And what evidence do you have outside of the bible of this initial connection? Other then the my book is better then all the rest rhetoric. What is your proof of Adam's existence and how EXACTLY do you date him. Secondly, you know nothing about Egypt, Babylon and Greece if you believe thier theology was based upon reflections derived from storms, thunder and earthquakes! In fact, Hebrew theology borrows MUCH from Egypt and Babylon. You are severly lacking in any real knowledge outside of hebrew 'history'. Sorcery and occultism flourished due to exploitation?? HUH?
Look, the bottom line is, contrary to what you believe, Hebrews did not introduce the Divine Creator/God to anyone outside of Europe...not the Myans, the Akan (of ghana, west africa), the Hindis etc...
Ohene is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 11:15 AM   #108
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohene View Post

Interestingly enough, but not suprisngly, you completely sidestepped the fact that DECADES of digs in the areas mentioned in OT have yielded nothing...no evidence of this 'great' nation, a 40 year sojourn in the dessert, thousands of slain soldiers from all of these so called wars, ruins of vast cities or towns, burial sites, writings....NOTHING. Your entire position is based on something written 2000 years after the fact...unless you can present evidence of anything other then an ORAL TRADITION that shows a collection of Hebrew writings before the Septaugint 'translation'.
More interesting is whether the oral or written laws have merit for humanity, in comparison of other laws. Ultimately, that is all that matters.
Many if not most cultures have laws that 'have merit for humanity' that are not derived in any way, shape or form from Hebrew laws :huh:
Ohene is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 07:18 AM   #109
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Loads of archeologists claimed king david & solomon were mythical figures
Name two.

And identify the publications in which they made that claim.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 02:05 PM   #110
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Loads of archeologists claimed king david & solomon were mythical figures
Name two.

And identify the publications in which they made that claim.
My friend Joseph may be right about this, unless you are disputing the semantics of the statement, like "loads" and "mythical".

This link might even be on this site:

http://www.geocities.com/paulntobin/david.html

My understanding of the current state of things is that David has a better than 50% chance of being a real guy, maybe a local war lord, while Solomon's existence appears to be more dubious.
semiopen is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.