FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-24-2006, 10:17 AM   #91
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xrikcus
You couldn't outlaw religion. You could end up a situation where a religious leader telling his congregation that what he believed is actually true, is outlawed. Is that really a bad thing? Are clashes between religions not so much down to believers beliefs, but believers being told that what they believe is true and everyone else is a heathen?
I am no lawyer, but to me the important point is that the religious leaders shouldn't be accepting money for telling things that were wrong, regardless of whether they sincerely believe it or not.
Selsaral is offline  
Old 05-25-2006, 07:09 AM   #92
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selsaral
to me the important point is that the religious leaders shouldn't be accepting money for telling things that were wrong, regardless of whether they sincerely believe it or not.
Two questions.

1. To whom would you assign the legal responsibility for deciding whether what a religious leader said was wrong?

2. Would you apply that principle only to religious leaders, or to anyone who accepts money for telling people what they think?
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 05-25-2006, 07:17 AM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver
2. Would you apply that principle only to religious leaders, or to anyone who accepts money for telling people what they think?
Or what they've been taught.

Would professors then become liable for promoting ideas that are later proven wrong by science and research?

My point being,most of the preachers just don't know any better.
Kosh is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 03:26 PM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosh
Would professors then become liable for promoting ideas that are later proven wrong by science and research?
I for one would really, really hate to see that happen. It would, for one thing, put an end to the teaching of science, or at least science as we know it (though not, perhaps, as creationists imagine that they know it).
Doug Shaver is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.