Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-20-2003, 09:44 AM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
|
Quote:
|
|
08-20-2003, 11:23 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Re: 6000 year old earth...
Quote:
Some stupid Hebrew scholars then have taken the myths from the Genesis (Hebrew: B'Reyshith, = Beginnings) which are of Sumerian and Indian origin 1.) (Vedas) and have coupled this 'Era of Creation' with the start of this calendar. But if in 3760 BCE there was a constant frequency in the 19 year cycle of sun and moon, it is no problem to counts the years in the Hebrew calendar Before That Era. In the Hebrew Calendar the years are counted from the 'Era of Creation', or 'Era Mundi', which corresponds to -3760 October 7 on the Julian proleptic calendar. Each year consists of twelve or thirteen months, with months consisting of 29 or 30 days. An intercalary month is introduced in years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, and 19 in a nineteen-year cycle of 235 lunation's. 1.) "The non-existent was not; the existent was not at that time. The atmosphere was not nor the heavens which are beyond. What was concealed? Where? In whose protection? Was it water? An fathomable abyss? There was neither death nor immortality then. There was not distinction of day or night. That alone breathed windless by its own power. Other than that there was not anything else. Darkness was hidden by darkness in the beginning. All this was an indistinguishable sea. That which becomes, that which was enveloped by the void, that alone was born through the power of heat. Upon that desire arose in the beginning. This was the first discharge of thought. Sages discovered this link of the existent to the nonexistent, having searched in the heart with wisdom. Their line [of vision] was extended across; what was below, what was above? There were impregnators, there were powers: inherent power below, impulses above. Who knows truly? Who here will declare whence it arose, whence this creation? The gods are subsequent to the creation of this. Who, then, knows whence it has come into being? Whence this creation has come into being; whether it was made or not; he in the highest heaven is its surveyor. Surely he knows, or perhaps he knows not." (Rig Veda) I think it is stupid to beat on anything in a book, while the relations of astrological basis in the Indian Rig Veda and in the Thorah myths are well known to them, who seek. Volker |
|
08-21-2003, 02:11 AM | #13 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
|
Volker.Doormann:
Quote:
Consider these quotes: http://www.bartleby.com/61/86/J0038600.html Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
08-21-2003, 02:28 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
It is no secret that thousands of theologicians now are on the history path searching a HJ, while the canonical Gospel Jesus is recognizable a myth. Don't blame them who have worked out a valuable Jewish calender to live in harmony with the nature of the moon and sun etc.; blame stupid historians, who ignore the spiritual orign of the Jewish culture in Christianity and Judaism. Seems, that you ignores that too. Volker |
|
08-21-2003, 02:41 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
|
Volker.Doormann:
I think the world is billions of years old. I'm saying that early Jewish people believed the world was created a few thousand years ago. You said: Quote:
|
|
08-21-2003, 03:35 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
I have given you serious hints to my claims, to verify this in scientific manner. You can find, that the creation myth is not of Jewish origin. This shows, that each claim of Hebrew scholars on a historical timeline is arrogant and wrong. The accuracy of the Hebrew calendar is based on serious astronomical data. In the same way you can study the meaning of the Hebrew myths, to understand its spiritual meaning of them, as the writer of Mesopotamia in 2800 BCE have dramatized the same theme. There is no reasonable relation that ancient people were more stupid then present people. Knowledge is an individal quality, not a quality of the time. Your saying is of no worth, because you cannot give a proof about. Your saying is pure fiction. It is not a common practice in science to interpret the belief of 'early Jewish people', because you have no facts. What is the belief of early American people? Do all the individuals belief in the very same idea? Judaism is a culture containing so many thoughts and individuals not one. Reincarnation is a common understanding in the Jewish mysticism, and some guys ignore the Saurian, because they were told, that the world was not then. But astrology was part of the Jewish culture, or sometimes war. They have captured the great myths from Sumerian to the Hebrew language and have done spiritual science in secret. The real fiction is, that there are Jews. There are only individuals like you and me, imperfect and sitting in a mortal body, searching for truth (sometime). Who cares about Isms. Volker |
|
08-21-2003, 05:41 AM | #17 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2003, 06:04 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2003, 06:16 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
(Jiddu Krishnamurti) " |
|
08-21-2003, 06:31 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
Volker |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|