FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-20-2003, 09:44 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by excreationist
Also, apparently the traditional Jewish calendar sets the date of creation at about 6000 years ago. I guess the calendar was started by some ancient scholars who used the genealogies to work out the date of creation.
The traditional Jewish calendar sets the date of creation at 5763 years from today - 3761 BCE. It is based on a 2nd century CE Talmudic chronology called Seder Olam Rabba.
Heathen Dawn is offline  
Old 08-20-2003, 11:23 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default Re: 6000 year old earth...

Quote:
Originally posted by conkermaniac
How exactly do fundies determine that the earth is approximately 6000 years old from the Bible?
The simple truth behind this number is, that this 5763 years do not determine the age of the earth, it is simple the number of years counts in the Hebrew calendar. Because the Hebrew calendar is a moon calendar - most all of the Hebrew ritulals are coupled to moon phases (Passover) and are religious symbols of life and death, - Hebrew priest have back calulated the 235 lunation's of the nineteen-year cycles of eclipses to the year 3760 BCE October 7 (in the Julian proleptic calendar).

Some stupid Hebrew scholars then have taken the myths from the Genesis (Hebrew: B'Reyshith, = Beginnings) which are of Sumerian and Indian origin 1.) (Vedas) and have coupled this 'Era of Creation' with the start of this calendar. But if in 3760 BCE there was a constant frequency in the 19 year cycle of sun and moon, it is no problem to counts the years in the Hebrew calendar Before That Era.

In the Hebrew Calendar the years are counted from the 'Era of Creation', or 'Era Mundi', which corresponds to -3760 October 7 on the Julian proleptic calendar. Each year consists of twelve or thirteen months, with months consisting of 29 or 30 days. An intercalary month is introduced in years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, and 19 in a nineteen-year cycle of 235 lunation's.

1.) "The non-existent was not; the existent was not at that time. The atmosphere was not nor the heavens which are beyond. What was concealed? Where? In whose protection? Was it water? An fathomable abyss? There was neither death nor immortality then. There was not distinction of day or night. That alone breathed windless by its own power. Other than that there was not anything else. Darkness was hidden by darkness in the beginning. All this was an indistinguishable sea. That which becomes, that which was enveloped by the void, that alone was born through the power of heat. Upon that desire arose in the beginning. This was the first discharge of thought. Sages discovered this link of the existent to the nonexistent, having searched in the heart with wisdom. Their line [of vision] was extended across; what was below, what was above? There were impregnators, there were powers: inherent power below, impulses above. Who knows truly? Who here will declare whence it arose, whence this creation? The gods are subsequent to the creation of this. Who, then, knows whence it has come into being? Whence this creation has come into being; whether it was made or not; he in the highest heaven is its surveyor. Surely he knows, or perhaps he knows not."
(Rig Veda)

I think it is stupid to beat on anything in a book, while the relations of astrological basis in the Indian Rig Veda and in the Thorah myths are well known to them, who seek.

Volker
Volker.Doormann is offline  
Old 08-21-2003, 02:11 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
Default

Volker.Doormann:
Quote:
The simple truth behind this number is, that this 5763 years do not determine the age of the earth, it is simple the number of years counts in the Hebrew calendar.
Are you saying that those who invented the Jewish calendar didn't think it signified the number of years since creation?

Consider these quotes:
http://www.bartleby.com/61/86/J0038600.html
Quote:
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.

Jewish calendar
NOUN: The lunisolar calendar used to mark the events of the Jewish year, dating the creation of the world at 3761 b.c.
http://www.kalendersysteme.de/englis..._03.html#notes
Quote:
A.M. Anno Mundi - ab creatione mundi (since creation of the world)
....
Jewish world era - The Patriarch Hillel IInd Náir specified the time of the creation of the world on 6th October 3761 b.o.c. (after the proleptisch Julian calendar).
to 3761 b.o.c. year 1 corresponds to the Jewish world era.
http://www.tondering.dk/claus/cal/no...00000000000000
Quote:
Years are counted since the creation of the world, which is assumed to have taken place in 3761 BC. In that year, AM 1 started (AM = Anno Mundi = year of the world).

In the year AD 2003 we witness the start of Hebrew year AM 5764.
excreationist is offline  
Old 08-21-2003, 02:28 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by excreationist
Are you saying that those who invented the Jewish calendar didn't think it signified the number of years since creation?
I say, that "Some stupid Hebrew scholars then have taken the myths from the Genesis (Hebrew: B'Reyshith, = Beginnings) which are of Sumerian and Indian origin 1.) (Vedas) and have coupled this 'Era of Creation' with the start of this calendar. But if in 3760 BCE there was a constant frequency in the 19 year cycle of sun and moon, it is no problem to counts the years in the Hebrew calendar Before That Era. "

It is no secret that thousands of theologicians now are on the history path searching a HJ, while the canonical Gospel Jesus is recognizable a myth. Don't blame them who have worked out a valuable Jewish calender to live in harmony with the nature of the moon and sun etc.; blame stupid historians, who ignore the spiritual orign of the Jewish culture in Christianity and Judaism. Seems, that you ignores that too.

Volker
Volker.Doormann is offline  
Old 08-21-2003, 02:41 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
Default

Volker.Doormann:
I think the world is billions of years old. I'm saying that early Jewish people believed the world was created a few thousand years ago.
You said:
Quote:
"In the Hebrew Calendar the years are counted from the 'Era of Creation', or 'Era Mundi', which corresponds to -3760 October 7
Doesn't "Era of Creation" refer to the creation of the world? It doesn't matter whether a young earth is a myth... I'm talking about what the early Jews believed.
excreationist is offline  
Old 08-21-2003, 03:35 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by excreationist
I think the world is billions of years old. I'm saying that early Jewish people believed the world was created a few thousand years ago. Doesn't "Era of Creation" refer to the creation of the world? It doesn't matter whether a young earth is a myth... I'm talking about what the early Jews believed.
It is of no meaning what you think. You must give proofs. You cannot give a proof about the time prior to Big Bang. It is simpel your personal believe, that the world has a countable age. There is no reason, why the world has an age; energy cannot be created to be then mass. Pure science fiction. The world was ever; the world is; material (mass) or immaterial (energy).

I have given you serious hints to my claims, to verify this in scientific manner. You can find, that the creation myth is not of Jewish origin. This shows, that each claim of Hebrew scholars on a historical timeline is arrogant and wrong. The accuracy of the Hebrew calendar is based on serious astronomical data. In the same way you can study the meaning of the Hebrew myths, to understand its spiritual meaning of them, as the writer of Mesopotamia in 2800 BCE have dramatized the same theme. There is no reasonable relation that ancient people were more stupid then present people. Knowledge is an individal quality, not a quality of the time.

Your saying is of no worth, because you cannot give a proof about. Your saying is pure fiction. It is not a common practice in science to interpret the belief of 'early Jewish people', because you have no facts.

What is the belief of early American people? Do all the individuals belief in the very same idea?

Judaism is a culture containing so many thoughts and individuals not one. Reincarnation is a common understanding in the Jewish mysticism, and some guys ignore the Saurian, because they were told, that the world was not then. But astrology was part of the Jewish culture, or sometimes war. They have captured the great myths from Sumerian to the Hebrew language and have done spiritual science in secret.

The real fiction is, that there are Jews. There are only individuals like you and me, imperfect and sitting in a mortal body, searching for truth (sometime). Who cares about Isms.

Volker
Volker.Doormann is offline  
Old 08-21-2003, 05:41 AM   #17
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:

The real fiction is, that there are Jews. There are only individuals like you and me, imperfect and sitting in a mortal body, searching for truth (sometime). Who cares about Isms.

Volker
. . . and then there were mythmakers who juxtaposed heaven with earth to form the genesis for a new civilization that would prosper and "become as numerous as the kernels of sand on the beach." These were the fathers of Juda-ism for out of their insigth the civilization was born and it doesn't matter if some elements were borrowed from existing cultures because all cultures have an archetypal similarity or they would not be true to the reality they represent.
 
Old 08-21-2003, 06:04 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Volker.Doormann
.....Your saying is of no worth, because you cannot give a proof about. Your saying is pure fiction. It is not a common practice in science to interpret the belief of 'early Jewish people', because you have no facts.

What is the belief of early American people? Do all the individuals belief in the very same idea?....
Ok... not all early Jews necessarily believed that the world was a few thousand years old. But at least one of them did, and him/they were influential enough to put a date for creation on the Jewish calendar which the Jews generally adopted. Some Jews probably reject the calendar though. BTW, I'm aware of the Hebrew creation myths coming from elsewhere.
excreationist is offline  
Old 08-21-2003, 06:16 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
. . . and then there were mythmakers who juxtaposed heaven with earth to form the genesis for a new civilization that would prosper and "become as numerous as the kernels of sand on the beach." These were the fathers of Juda-ism for out of their insigth the civilization was born and it doesn't matter if some elements were borrowed from existing cultures because all cultures have an archetypal similarity or they would not be true to the reality they represent.
"When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European, or anything else, you are being violent. Do you see why it is violent? Because you are separating yourself from the rest of mankind. When you separate yourself by belief, by nationality, by tradition, it breeds violence. So a man who is seeking to understand violence does not belong to any country, to any religion, to any political party or partial system; he is concerned with the total understanding of mankind.
(Jiddu Krishnamurti) "
Volker.Doormann is offline  
Old 08-21-2003, 06:31 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by excreationist
Ok... not all early Jews necessarily believed that the world was a few thousand years old. But at least one of them did, and him/they were influential enough to put a date for creation on the Jewish calendar which the Jews generally adopted.
You cannot give a proof. The start of a calendar is arbitrary, it must only match to astronomical laws. Myths cannot create moon calendars, but a calendar can creat myths.

Volker
Volker.Doormann is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.