FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2005, 07:25 AM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
What does "every creature" mean? How does one take the gospel to an amoeba?
Good question. Creatures only exist in the mind of the beholder wherein only the caricature of the creature must be converted.
Chili is offline  
Old 09-09-2005, 01:56 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,234
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Good question. Creatures only exist in the mind of the beholder wherein only the caricature of the creature must be converted.
So: We create millions of plush-amoeba dolls, and convert them?

--because otherwise, I have no fucking idea what you just wrote NB
Nero's Boot is offline  
Old 09-09-2005, 05:40 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
It's probably not Ogden Nash:

Quote:
How odd of Christopher Hitchens, in his review of Douglas Murray's biography of Lord Alfred Douglas [NYR, September 21, 2000], to attribute to Douglas the familiar anti-Semitic doggerel "How odd/Of God/To choose/The Jews." Usually the attribution is to Hillaire Belloc, but in fact the verse was written by William Norman Ewer (1885–1976). The almost equally well known reply was written by Cecil Browne: "But not so odd/As those who choose/A Jewish God/But spurn the Jews." The riposte quoted (actually misquoted) by Hitchens—"Not odd/Of God./ Goyim/Annoy 'im."—was penned by the noted American author and Yiddishist Leo Rosten. (from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/14176)
Booklady is offline  
Old 09-10-2005, 08:43 AM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nero's Boot
So: We create millions of plush-amoeba dolls, and convert them?

--because otherwise, I have no fucking idea what you just wrote NB
Yes, we must convert our own creations and they only exist in our own mind. The rest just "is" as in "I AM."
Chili is offline  
Old 09-10-2005, 09:12 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

YHWH was clearly a tribal God, never meant to apply to everyone. Christians then altered Him to be an all-inclusive God.
Joan of Bark is offline  
Old 09-10-2005, 09:26 AM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark
YHWH was clearly a tribal God, never meant to apply to everyone. Christians then altered Him to be an all-inclusive God.
You mean like a sober drunk they will take anything along to relieve the pain of alienation?
Chili is offline  
Old 09-13-2005, 04:56 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark
YHWH was clearly a tribal God, never meant to apply to everyone. Christians then altered Him to be an all-inclusive God.
Hmmm...Well, yes and no. In the Hellenistic period some Jews liked to depict Judaism as a philosophical way of life by which all people could and should live. Even before this, certain passages in the Hebrew Bible (Deutero-Isaiah comes to mind) suggest that God ultimately sought all the nations to be included in his cult.

So, Yahweh as an all-inclusive god wasn't really a Christian innovation.

Cheers,
SC
SaintCog is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.