Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Justin Z · 02-18-2005, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bible Thumper

In other words, the Universe is closed to anything or ayone living outside it!

Aren't Naturalists funny?!

What's truly funny is while the statement is, in my opinion, poorly worded, it also happens to be perfectly grammatically correct.

Incidentally, I did not drop out of English 212 (English Grammar).

~Justin

markd · 02-18-2005, 12:08 PM

:huh:
Thanks for stopping by.

capsaicin67 · 02-18-2005, 09:49 PM

R98:

Quote:

I think this has an ~E~ flavor about it.

Hmmm. Even that might be generous. What category comes after Elsewhere.....?

Weltall · 02-18-2005, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by capsaicin67

Hmmm. Even that might be generous. What category comes after Elsewhere.....?

Well, we were thinking about having an '~Elsewhere~: Light' category but he finally went and got himself banned... Hmm, maybe we should create a new forum called 'The 10th Circle' for anything below the already low standards of ~E~.

MrFrosty · 02-19-2005, 02:12 AM

This thread lacks the funnay. I feel cheated, fuckers.

There should be an extra hardcore version of ~E~, yeah.

Daggah · 02-19-2005, 08:53 AM

Bad Kitty · 02-21-2005, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrFrosty

This thread lacks the funnay. I feel cheated, fuckers.

There should be an extra hardcore version of ~E~, yeah.

Perhaps you missed Boro Nut's post. That was funny.

The Bible Thumper · 02-22-2005, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woodstock memories

I don't get it ?!?

Where's the humor?

What's funny, is that Naturalists and Evolutionists tend to have a lower IQ than those in the sciences (hence the reason why they had a hard time with long division when in the 10th grade and why they never got past intermediate algebra in college), so they have to fluff-up every point or idea they make with a hodge-podge of extraneous and unnecessary words. Re-read P/Draper's statement, then re-read mine, directly below it. They both say the same exact thing; it's just that P/Draper had to fluff up his statement with a mumbo-jumbo collection of superfluous words to compensate for a lack of intelligence!

As my Sister in Christ (the Church Lady) would say, "How Conveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeenient!"

Refused · 02-22-2005, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bible Thumper

What's funny, is that Naturalists and Evolutionists tend to have a lower IQ than those in the sciences (hence the reason why they had a hard time with long division when in the 10th grade and why they never got past intermediate algebra in college), so they have to fluff-up every point or idea they make with a hodge-podge of extraneous and unnecessary words. Re-read P/Draper's statement, then re-read mine, directly below it. They both say the same exact thing; it's just that P/Draper had to fluff up his statement with a mumbo-jumbo collection of superfluous words to compensate for a lack of intelligence!

As my Sister in Christ (the Church Lady) would say, "How Conveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeenient!"

Why do you come here? Your insistence on attacking everyone's intelligence is growing old.

From the GRD forum:

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bible Thumper

What astounds me even more than their absence of brain cells is that the militant athiest is certain that he has no 'soul', that there is no 'afterlife', that there is no God who creates.

...

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bible Thumper

Correction. The Athiest DOES have brain cells. All two of them. And, lol, they are always arguing with each other...

You've been shown to be blatantly wrong on just about every thread you've participated in. Please, engage in polite and sincere debate or leave.

- Refused

woodheart · 02-22-2005, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bible Thumper

What's funny, is that Naturalists and Evolutionists tend to have a lower IQ than those in the sciences (hence the reason why they had a hard time with long division when in the 10th grade and why they never got past intermediate algebra in college), so they have to fluff-up every point or idea they make with a hodge-podge of extraneous and unnecessary words. Re-read P/Draper's statement, then re-read mine, directly below it. They both say the same exact thing; it's just that P/Draper had to fluff up his statement with a mumbo-jumbo collection of superfluous words to compensate for a lack of intelligence!

As my Sister in Christ (the Church Lady) would say, "How Conveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeenient!"

Why are you still here?

You say that Naturalists and Evolutionists tend to have a lower IQ? If you are for real, I say to you, that the people you have mentioned show more capacity for abstract thought then a lot of "Christians" that I have meet. I am not putting down all Christians just the ones that think anybody who says anyone who thinks differently is wrong and going to hell.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

02-18-2005, 12:08 PM	#12
markd Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: iowa Posts: 1,081	:huh: Thanks for stopping by.

02-19-2005, 02:12 AM	#15
MrFrosty Moderator - Miscellaneous Discussions Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Shenzhen, S.E. China (UK ex-pat) Posts: 14,249	This thread lacks the funnay. I feel cheated, fuckers. There should be an extra hardcore version of ~E~, yeah.

02-19-2005, 08:53 AM	#16
Daggah Banned Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Deployed to Kosovo Posts: 4,314

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.