FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2012, 09:13 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 7,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post

Many people without vested interests suspect it may be a big lie.
Many people without vested interests suspect it is a big truth.
This is obviously false. If someone believed the gospels were true they would also realize they have a vested interest because of their eternal soul.
Nexus is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 09:34 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesABrown View Post
Matthew alone puts guards at the tomb.

But then that opens a can of worms.

Because that would mean that a bunch of unwashed pagan guards were the first to witness the resurrection.
The only person reported to have astonished Jesus in a positive way was a Roman soldier.
Not relevant to the discussion.

If there were guards posted at the tomb then they were the first ones to see a resurrected Jesus walk out of the tomb. Where is their eyewitness testimony? Did they die for the faith? Were they the first evangelists?

Matthew had good intentions. In order to squash the skeptic's claims that the disciples stole the body, Matthew writes that guards were posted at the tomb. But it wouldn't do for pagan guards to be the first eyewitnesses of Jesus' resurrection. So Matthew finds he's painted himself into a corner.

To solve this, Matthew can't have Jesus walking out of the tomb the way the other gospel writers presumably pictured it. Instead, Matthew's Jesus teleports out to an unknown location. That's why, when the angel rolls the tombstone away, the tomb is empty.

But that creates yet another problem for Matthew. Why did the women see the angel roll the tombstone away (in direct contradiction to the other gospels, btw), but the guards did not? Guards witnessing an angel would be nearly as awkward as guards witnessing a resurrected Christ. So how can Matthew, having put the guards at the tomb in the first place, now get them out of the picture while still leaving no room for the skeptics to claim the body was stolen?

Easy. Matthew inserts a devastating earthquake that makes the guards faint. Only there are a few problems with this, however. First, earthquakes, especially ones large enough to split rocks, tend to wake people up, not make them pass out. Second, why didn't any other gospel writer--or contemporary historian of any religious persuasion--report the earthquake? Third, what kind of earthquake would make seasoned, hardened guards pass out with a bad case of the vapors, and yet have no effect on the frightened women?

So Matthew, in the attempt to forestall one skeptic, creates issues for more skeptics with each step. Matthew's gospel is a mess.
James Brown is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 09:57 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesABrown View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesABrown View Post
Matthew alone puts guards at the tomb.

But then that opens a can of worms.

Because that would mean that a bunch of unwashed pagan guards were the first to witness the resurrection.
The only person reported to have astonished Jesus in a positive way was a Roman soldier.
Quote:
Not relevant to the discussion.
Really?

Quote:
If there were guards posted at the tomb then they were the first ones to see a resurrected Jesus walk out of the tomb.
Why does it matter whether they had washed, or not?
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 09:58 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexus View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post

Many people without vested interests suspect it may be a big lie.
Many people without vested interests suspect it is a big truth.
This is obviously false. If someone believed the gospels were true they would also realize they have a vested interest because of their eternal soul.
Yes, some people are very self-centred.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:33 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
It is clear that the Jesus story in gMatthew is UTTER fiction.
Many people without vested interests suspect it may be a big lie.
Many people without vested interests suspect it is a big truth.
The leaders of organized religion have used this lying story to extract countless billions from the sheeple, to accomplish placing themselves in mansions, dress themselves in fancy and colorful robes, adorn themselves with gold ornaments, and to live lives of indolence off the labors of others.
Yes, from its beginnings, the leaders of the Christian Church have held an extremely vested interest in the promotion of lies.
It is their very livelihood, and if the lie lapses, they would actually have to learn a trade, and produce something of value to live, rather than practice clever extortion from others through their lies.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:21 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
It is clear that the Jesus story in gMatthew is UTTER fiction.
Many people without vested interests suspect it may be a big lie.
Many people without vested interests suspect it is a big truth.
The leaders of organized religion have used this lying story
Come now, circularity must be eschewed in serious discussion.

Quote:
to extract countless billions from the sheeple
Sheeple seem very content about this grazing habit. They willingly put themselves in debt, happily endure mindless TV at 'Christmastime'. Atheists included. Of course, their mantra, "Good will to all men" really is a lie. There seem to be vested interests lurking in unsuspected places.

Quote:
to accomplish placing themselves in mansions, dress themselves in fancy and colorful robes, adorn themselves with gold ornaments, and to live lives of indolence off the labors of others.
But they were doing that very efficiently before Jesus. Babylonians, Assyrians, Egyptians and more, all used religion as opiate of the workers.

And they don't do it now nearly as much as they used to. Why is that? Well, to a very large extent, it is due to historical phenomena— the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Enlightenment— that uncovered and explained Matthew's gospel for the first time in a thousand years. They found that Matthew had rather handily recorded this:

'You are not to be called 'Rabbi', because you have only one Master and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth 'Father', because you have one Father, and he is in heaven."' 23:8-9

So they stopped calling men who dressed themselves in fancy and colourful robes, and who adorned themselves with gold ornaments, 'Father'.

They also discovered this little gem:

'Even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: "If a man will not work, he shall not eat." 2 Th 3:10 NIV

After that, sheeple at last turned into people, and lived lives of something like due reward for their labour, for the first time in the history of the world. So we could better say that Matthew and his pal Paul improved the lot of humanity.

So few are grateful, though. There seem to be vested interests lurking in unsuspected places.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:34 AM   #27
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesABrown View Post
Matthew alone puts guards at the tomb.

But then that opens a can of worms.

Because that would mean that a bunch of unwashed pagan guards were the first to witness the resurrection.
Matthew had the religious insight thatthe final impostor is a real danger and the chief priest saw this in the case of Matthews Jesus. Hence the very alert and Pilate's caution triggered the missing body. Metaphysics here that also renders Pilate pagan.
Chili is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:14 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
It is clear that the Jesus story in gMatthew is UTTER fiction.
Many people without vested interests suspect it may be a big lie.
Many people without vested interests suspect it is a big truth.
The leaders of organized religion have used this lying story
Come now, circularity must be eschewed in serious discussion.

Quote:
to extract countless billions from the sheeple
Sheeple seem very content about this grazing habit. They willingly put themselves in debt, happily endure mindless TV at 'Christmastime'. Atheists included. Of course, their mantra, "Good will to all men" really is a lie. There seem to be vested interests lurking in unsuspected places.

Quote:
to accomplish placing themselves in mansions, dress themselves in fancy and colorful robes, adorn themselves with gold ornaments, and to live lives of indolence off the labors of others.
But they were doing that very efficiently before Jesus. Babylonians, Assyrians, Egyptians and more, all used religion as opiate of the workers.

And they don't do it now nearly as much as they used to. Why is that? Well, to a very large extent, it is due to historical phenomena— the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Enlightenment— that uncovered and explained Matthew's gospel for the first time in a thousand years. They found that Matthew had rather handily recorded this:

'You are not to be called 'Rabbi', because you have only one Master and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth 'Father', because you have one Father, and he is in heaven."' 23:8-9

So they stopped calling men who dressed themselves in fancy and colourful robes, and who adorned themselves with gold ornaments, 'Father'.
Some did, well over a billion certainly haven't, and their numbers are still increasing.
The leaders of the various 'catholic' and Protestant denominations, you can be sure, will be ensconced in impressive surroundings, sup well, and sleep in their fine beds tonight
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce
They also discovered this little gem:

'Even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: "If a man will not work, he shall not eat." 2 Th 3:10 NIV

After that, sheeple at last turned into people, and lived lives of something like due reward for their labour, for the first time in the history of the world. So we could better say that Matthew and his pal Paul improved the lot of humanity.
Perhaps some day they will also discover the meaning of this little gem;

"The Mother of WHORES, and abominations of the earth." Rev 17:5

All of her daughters are WHORES, all of them alike, are suckled on her breasts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce
So few are grateful, though. There seem to be vested interests lurking in unsuspected places.
Certainly not only in The 'Mother' Church, but upon every street corner, high hill, and field;
Wherever these daughter whores of The Great Whore go, lay themselves down, and spread.



.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:50 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Some did.
All have the choice, outside sharia. Just as 'atheists' like Dawkins have the choice to lustily sing carols. Vested interests, remember.

Be grateful. Every time you post.

Quote:
The leaders of the various 'catholic' and Protestant denominations
Denominations are for coinage, not Christianity.

Remember, if is it not too painful, "You are all brothers."

Quote:
you can be sure, will be ensconced in impressive surroundings, sup well, and sleep in their fine beds tonight
Though even that is absurdity.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 08:01 PM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
...All have the choice, outside sharia. Just as 'atheists' like Dawkins have the choice to lustily sing carols. Vested interests, remember.

Be grateful. Every time you post....
"First Apology"
Quote:
Hence are we called atheists. And we confess that we are atheists, so far as gods of this sort are concerned, but not with respect to the most true God, the Father of righteousness and temperance and the other virtues, who is free from all impurity....

Christians were called Atheists in antiquity ---Nothing has changed except that the Jesus cult of Christians have become POLITICALLY Empowered and now dish out the name Atheist to those who maintain that the Jesus cult of Christians do NOT believe in a God but a Myth Fable about a Son of a Ghost that was RAISED from the dead while the Soldiers said they SLEPT.
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.