FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2004, 12:06 AM   #171
Ad Astra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
So you can't trust that Do not murder is a good law to keep in place?
Murder:
The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice.

Creating a law against murder (which, as stated above, is already defined as unlawful) is a bit redundant, isn't it? But, I'm sure your god has a good reason for being so redundant, correct? So, maybe you could put him on the line so we can talk to him about that, okay?
 
Old 06-07-2004, 12:07 AM   #172
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
The Bible is a lot easier to determine the laws from than trying to learn all the U.S laws.
No, it's not, since many laws are contradictory and the rationale behind other is unclear.

Quote:
The laws are there to protect us for the most part.
For the most part? Are there laws that are designed to control or demean people, rather than to protect them?

Quote:
You're welcome not to trust them, but breaking them can lead to pretty devastating consequences.
Yes, you could be happy. (This is devastating to people who want to convert you to their religion)
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:08 AM   #173
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenek
Well for starters, the book's author is listed as Charles Darwin. This may seem rather simple but compare to the various books of the Bible. Not a one of them seems to be signed by God. IIRC a fifth or so are Paul's letters.
2Ti 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Quote:
Secondly, Charles Darwin was credited with being the naturalist on a ship which explored around Galapagos. Ideas in the book appear to have been taken from the experience of someone in that region.
Jesus is credited with being the Messiah in Jerusalem. Ideas in the book appear to have been taken from the experience of someone in that region.

Quote:
Thirdly, the claim here (Darwin wrote a book) is not a stretch. Massive conspiracies aside, the burden of proof should clearly be on the shoulders of one denying that Origin was authored by Darwin.
But we can't actually trust that Darwin wrote the OoS, so why should I trust whats written in it?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:08 AM   #174
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 289
Default

And we all know that an argument from cut&paste, backed up by argument from repetition, is what proving things is all about.
Nasreddin is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:09 AM   #175
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ad Astra
Murder:
The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice.

Creating a law against murder (which, as stated above, is already defined as unlawful) is a bit redundant, isn't it? But, I'm sure your god has a good reason for being so redundant, correct? So, maybe you could put him on the line so we can talk to him about that, okay?
No its not really redundant since people still do it anyway. Its legal in some countries.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:10 AM   #176
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 979
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
1) There are more than 5 laws. And the bible is verbose? You are aware how many laws The U.S has and how many books contain those laws correct? We have these schools that require massive amounts of study to even gain knowledge of the basics of our law system. The Bible is a lot easier to determine the laws from than trying to learn all the U.S laws.

2) The laws are there to protect us for the most part. You're welcome not to trust them, but breaking them can lead to pretty devastating consequences.
If the law of a country says you can't drive through a red light, that means you can't drive through a red light. Biblical laws tell me not to work on the Sabbath. WTF does that mean? I can't avoid doing work on the Sabbath. I can't even *die* to avoid that one.

I am, apparently, also commanded to butcher people who worship another God. This law wouldn't protect me at all; I'd probably end up either dead or in jail permanently, depending on where I start.

Then there's that whole mess of "laws we can ignore" and "laws we can't ignore". (Shellfish, etc.)

Lastly, why should I place the Bible above all other alleged sources of Divine Law in the first place?
Tenek is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:12 AM   #177
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
2Ti 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
Even if this particular scripture is accurate, how does inspiration mean that the bible is actually the work of god? It means that the ideas and concepts passed through the filter of human beings before being written down - and may therefore have problems.

By the way, where's the doctrine, reproof, correction, etc. in the Song of Solomon? How does "Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth, for thy love is better than wine" instruct people in righteousness?
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 06-07-2004, 12:13 AM   #178
doubtingthomas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Incorrect. This is a false reading of Matt 24 by atheists. Jesus is describing the end times events. Why would Jesus need to tell the Apostles to write down the end times events and "this generation" if they were the only ones who were gonna see it? The Bible was written for future generations, not the 1st century generation. The apostles wrote it so those in the future who read the Gospel, and witnessed the signs revealed by Jesus would know that they are who Jesus is referring to. You could read it more accurately as "The generation of the end times shall not pass until these things are fullfilled". The apostles just broke it up into more depth.
Wrong.

Your interpretation would be possible if there wasn't so much evidence favoring mine.

1. In listing the signs of the age Jesus' tells the disciples "you shall see", implying that it would happen to them.

2. There are three similar quotes made by Jesus
"If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you? You must follow me." John 21:22

"I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom." Matthew 16:28

"I tell you the truth, you will not finish going through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes." Matthew 10:23


3. The early christians seemed to think that the coming would occur within their lifetime

"Where is this 'coming' he promised? Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation." 2 Peter 3:4

"Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed-- in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. " - 1 Corinthians 15:51-52
 
Old 06-07-2004, 12:15 AM   #179
Ad Astra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
No its not really redundant since people still do it anyway.
So, a law that basically says "Follow the law" isn't redundant because people still break that law? Well, if people break that law that says "Follow the law", by your logic we need a law that says "Follow the law that says to follow the law" and so on and so forth.

Quote:
Its legal in some countries.
Please explain how murder, the unlawful killing of one person by another person, can be "legal in some countries."
 
Old 06-07-2004, 12:15 AM   #180
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenek
If the law of a country says you can't drive through a red light, that means you can't drive through a red light. Biblical laws tell me not to work on the Sabbath. WTF does that mean? I can't avoid doing work on the Sabbath. I can't even *die* to avoid that one.
Actually the Sabbath law is the only one of the commandments Jesus didn't enforce in the Nt. The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. Do not steal and Do not lie are pretty straight forward.

Quote:
I am, apparently, also commanded to butcher people who worship another God. This law wouldn't protect me at all; I'd probably end up either dead or in jail permanently, depending on where I start.
Um no you're not. Love thy enemy.

Quote:
Then there's that whole mess of "laws we can ignore" and "laws we can't ignore". (Shellfish, etc.)
Unless you live in 1000 B.C Ancient Israel, follow the laws of Jesus.

Quote:
Lastly, why should I place the Bible above all other alleged sources of Divine Law in the first place?
Because other laws go against basic human morals. Islam commands you to kill infidels and fight in Holy wars. Blowing up buildings doesn't sound like a Divine law.
Magus55 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.