![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,000
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
Don't have time to read the transcript right now, but it sound as though Dean is still talking straight.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
|
![]() Quote:
1) In the summer of 2002, it was Colin Powell AND Condi Rice who made a concerted effort to convince Bush to go through the UN (or at least try to) on Iraq. Though the UN path didn't prove fruitful and used a half year in the process, the episode suggests that Rice is no more or less likely to be independent-minded than Powell (ie the guy she's replacing). 2) Historically, Sec'ys of State, like other Cabinet members, are mostly chosen on a combination of expertise AND loyalty to the president. Dean is essentially laying out his candidacy for Party Chairman in terms of his oppositionalism to Bush (just as he did during the primaries); good luck to him on it but do we REALLY have to take his blather seriously? Was "Madeleine Albright" "independent minded"? I can't say I remember a SINGLE instance where she disagreed with the Prez (at least where it became public). Ditto with Warren Christopher. On Kosovo. On Iraq. On Bosnia Hercegovina.......On Rwanda......on Somalia......on China policy.... |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|