Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Aquila_Geminus · 04-13-2006, 07:00 AM

Are you morally opposed to ******x, even if all animals involved are consenting adults?

dancer_rnb · 04-13-2006, 07:06 AM

Depends on what we are talking about. If it is something like murder or mutilation, I would be opposed to it.

Aquila_Geminus · 04-13-2006, 07:18 AM

Well, obviously we are talking about ******x.

Didn't you read the OP before you posted?

scisyhp · 04-13-2006, 07:33 AM

******x,?

HaysooChreesto! · 04-13-2006, 07:36 AM

Yesterday, I would have said that ******x is really wrong. But today I'm all for it.

KoopaFanatic · 04-13-2006, 07:42 AM

How dare you suggest such a thing? Every right-thinking person in this world knows that allowing free and unfettered access to ******x would cause the downfall of society. I've heard they encourage animal ******x in Japan, and look what's happening there: children are studying for exams and people have longer life expectancies! That's just not the kind of world I want to live in. And let's not forget that little experiment the Mormons had with ******x when they first settled in Provo. I don't think any of us want to go back to those days.

I hope I've explained my position well enough.

post tenebras lux · 04-13-2006, 07:43 AM

******x?

All I can think of is Goretex and Spantex.

If you're talking about the former, then I think that Goretex is quite safe when used responsibly, even when mixing animal fibres in. In certain conditions, I have felt an 'expression of joy' for certain articles of Goretex.

Spandex, on the other hand, is pure evil. It should never be used outside of 70's period pieces and museums catering for air-guitar saddos. No adult animal would ever consent to being seen in Spandex unless they were severely drugged at the time.

Mediancat · 04-13-2006, 07:44 AM

If those first six letters anagram to "goes at," then -- due to mirror sites - -we've blocked this combination.

Just like we did with the original one at "something awful."

Rob aka Mediancat

Nexus · 04-13-2006, 07:46 AM

I can't think of anything between consenting adults I would be oppsed to. For instance I think duels to the death should be allowed and certainly anything sexual.

However I would agree with laws requiring proof of consent if necessary. So if people wanted to duel they would need to obtain a license. No breaking into someones home and killing them then saying it was a duel.

KoopaFanatic · 04-13-2006, 07:51 AM

Oh, and here I thought we were talking about the Bowflex exercise machines.

04-13-2006, 07:00 AM	#1
Aquila_Geminus Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Atlanta GA Posts: 1,826	A poll regarding **x Are you morally opposed to ******x, even if all animals involved are consenting adults?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

04-13-2006, 07:06 AM	#2
dancer_rnb Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Austin, Tx Posts: 2,520	Depends on what we are talking about. If it is something like murder or mutilation, I would be opposed to it.

04-13-2006, 07:18 AM	#3
Aquila_Geminus Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Atlanta GA Posts: 1,826	Well, obviously we are talking about ******x. Didn't you read the OP before you posted?

04-13-2006, 07:33 AM	#4
scisyhp Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Goodrich, Mi Posts: 538	******x,?

04-13-2006, 07:36 AM	#5
HaysooChreesto! Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: SoCal USA Posts: 7,737	Yesterday, I would have said that ******x is really wrong. But today I'm all for it.

04-13-2006, 07:42 AM	#6
KoopaFanatic Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Virginia Posts: 2,867	How dare you suggest such a thing? Every right-thinking person in this world knows that allowing free and unfettered access to ****x would cause the downfall of society. I've heard they encourage animal **x in Japan, and look what's happening there: children are studying for exams and people have longer life expectancies! That's just not the kind of world I want to live in. And let's not forget that little experiment the Mormons had with ****x when they first settled in Provo. I don't think any of us want to go back to those days. I hope I've explained my position well enough.

04-13-2006, 07:43 AM	#7
post tenebras lux Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Republic and Canton of Geneva Posts: 5,756	*****x? All I can think of is Goretex and Spantex. If you're talking about the former, then I think that Goretex is quite safe when used responsibly, even when mixing animal fibres in. In certain conditions, I have felt an 'expression of joy*' for certain articles of Goretex. Spandex, on the other hand, is pure evil. It should never be used outside of 70's period pieces and museums catering for air-guitar saddos. No adult animal would ever consent to being seen in Spandex unless they were severely drugged at the time.

04-13-2006, 07:44 AM	#8
Mediancat Contributor Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Baltimore County, MD Posts: 19,644	If those first six letters anagram to "goes at," then -- due to mirror sites - -we've blocked this combination. Just like we did with the original one at "something awful." Rob aka Mediancat

04-13-2006, 07:46 AM	#9
Nexus Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: California Posts: 7,655	I can't think of anything between consenting adults I would be oppsed to. For instance I think duels to the death should be allowed and certainly anything sexual. However I would agree with laws requiring proof of consent if necessary. So if people wanted to duel they would need to obtain a license. No breaking into someones home and killing them then saying it was a duel.

04-13-2006, 07:51 AM	#10
KoopaFanatic Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Virginia Posts: 2,867	Oh, and here I thought we were talking about the Bowflex exercise machines.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.