Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-06-2006, 06:42 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 543
|
And it's kind of irrelevant to the discussion . . . I mean, there was no year zero, but regardless, the year wasn't numbered by the BC/AD system at the time. Nobody woke up and said, "Hey, you hear about that kid born in the stable over in Bethlehem the other day? I guess we should start over numbering the years now." It wasn't the year 1 (or the year 0) at the time, so the invention/popularization of zero relative to that date doesn't matter.
|
12-06-2006, 01:28 PM | #32 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,615
|
so its one big semantics argument...
|
12-06-2006, 02:36 PM | #33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 6,004
|
Isn't it known though that there was no census in the winter of year 1? And the supposed reason for Mary and Joseph being in Bethlehem at the time Jesus was born was to be in a census. IIRC, the census took place in the summer 4 years later...
|
12-06-2006, 06:02 PM | #34 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In a Blues Nation, In the 99%
Posts: 15,479
|
Getting back to Coca cola and the image of Santa. Clement Clarke Moore (1779 - 1863) wrote Twas the night before Christmas also called A Visit from St. Nicholas in 1822. It's his imagery of Santa that is what we use today.
For some pre-Coke pics see http://www.americanantiquarian.org/E.../santa2000.htm (Fanatics make it SOOOOO easy) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|