FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-18-2007, 09:03 PM   #101
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
Well, I suppose I have to take the good with the bad. On the one hand, you lump me in with scholars. That sounds good. On the other hand, I am being pigheaded. That sounds bad.
Not to worry, I am being pig-headed myself, sometimes.

Quote:
But what on earth gives you the idea that I would deny a connection between the virgin birth and a pagan myth? I have nothing at stake in either affirming or denying such a connection. I just want to see the evidence, plain and simple. Late fragments dating to century V of obscure origin are not going to do it for me, at least not without some kind of concrete substantiation.
But Ben, you yourself supplied an exquisite example of the Augustan virginal impregnation. And what about the Messianic Eclogue of Virgil ? And again that Stobaeus wrote his Anthology in the 5th. century does not immediately postdate the tradition - would you make this sort of a leap to judgment if some antique Christian relic appeared in a text dated several centuries later ?

Quote:
What pagan myth, specifically, or combination of myths do you find behind the virgin birth narratives as found in Matthew and Luke?
Ben, please be reasonable, it's like asking which particular fox Aesop had in mind for his fable. How can anyone tell ? Are the 'magoi' of Matthew really Mithraic priests paying homage ? Does Luke's "stable" relate to Dionysius' boukolion, and if you want to tell me it was not a stable but a "cave", was it paralleled after Mithra's birthplace ? J.G Frazer recounts in Golden Bough that the start annual festivals of Adonis in Antioch (of all places) was triggered by the appearance of Venus, the Star of the East. Is
this just another coincidence ?

Quote:
Matthew and Luke say little or nothing about how Mary would conceive. If divine impregnation is present in those texts, it is pretty subtle.
Well, actually, Luke's seems to be pretty cryptic but no doubt who did the impregnating. At least it was consensual. In Matthew, Joseph receives the annunciation with an explanation from Isaiah. That's it. Not a word of it to Mary. And Joseph did not know Mary before she conceived.

For subtlety though both beat the Protevangelium where Salome nearly lost her hand certifying Mary's post-partum hymen.

Quote:
Quote:
That idea would be as offensive to a mainstream, Jewish traditionalist (in early rabbinical Judaism), as it later was to Mohammed and his followers.
Sure, and maybe that was why Matthew and Luke were so vague on the particulars. Maybe they would have found divine impregnation offensive. But, if they are both suppressing that element, it remains to be explained from which tale they are suppressing it. Where did the idea arise, in your judgment?
As I indicated in an earlier post, I think the "virgin birth" had a narrower function in the Jesus mysteries. It is a motive which relates to the resurrectional "appearance of the Lord" and the "newness of life" that one feels afterward (like a babe in Christ), or physiologically, the photic experience of a partial TL seizure followed by the complex, prolonged, sensations of "jamais vu" (partial amnesia) and pronounced infantile regressions that a subject (or an adept in whom this experience is induced ritually) undergoes in the process. I was pointing to the Nicodemus story in John, as a proof of sorts that the virgin birth was a concept relating to spiritual birth. One of the particularities of John vis-a-vis the synoptics is that almost completely lacks the nocturnal motives of the three. You did notice, did you not that nearly all the miraculous happenings (including the Sanhedrin trial) in the synoptics happen at night, or early morning setting, or where the disciples are sleepy ? In John only Nicodemus carries a substantial "mystery" meaning to the holy night.

So the Johanine church had a "virgin birth" conceptual parallel, for a while, which, I imagine, in time gave way completely to the Nativity allegory.

Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:52 AM   #102
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
But Ben, you yourself supplied an exquisite example of the Augustan virginal impregnation. And what about the Messianic Eclogue of Virgil ?
Yes, and I have already stated quite clearly that I think the birth narratives of Jesus are answering, in one way or another, to that kind of claim for Augustus.

Quote:
And again that Stobaeus wrote his Anthology in the 5th. century does not immediately postdate the tradition....
Absolutely true.

Quote:
...would you make this sort of a leap to judgment if some antique Christian relic appeared in a text dated several centuries later ?
(Why Christian here? I try to treat all texts equally until they prove themselves unequal.)

But of course not. I would try to trace the tradition as far back as I could.

There are plenty of traditions, Christian or otherwise, that I omit from my reconstruction of century I Christianity precisely because I cannot trace the tradition back far enough. John Mark founding the church in Alexandria, for instance.

Now, are you prepared to trace your tradition back as far as you can?

Quote:
Ben, please be reasonable....
Asking for the primary evidence is always reasonable.

Quote:
...it's like asking which particular fox Aesop had in mind for his fable. How can anyone tell ?
If asking about pagan influences on the birth narratives is like asking which fox Aesop had in mind, then the entire question is moot.

Quote:
Are the 'magoi' of Matthew really Mithraic priests paying homage ?
I have no idea. Please tell me. Show me the primary texts you have in mind so that I might make an informed judgment.

Quote:
Does Luke's "stable" relate to Dionysius' boukolion, and if you want to tell me it was not a stable but a "cave", was it paralleled after Mithra's birthplace ?
Good questions. Show me the texts as I have done for the Augustan birth account and the Priene inscription, and then perhaps we can come to some sort of answer.

Quote:
J.G Frazer recounts in Golden Bough that the start annual festivals of Adonis in Antioch (of all places) was triggered by the appearance of Venus, the Star of the East. Is this just another coincidence ?
A preliminary question would be: Is this even accurate? Just show me the primary text(s), and perhaps we can answer both questions.

Quote:
You did notice, did you not that nearly all the miraculous happenings (including the Sanhedrin trial) in the synoptics happen at night, or early morning setting, or where the disciples are sleepy ?
No, I did not notice that. Nor do I think it is true. I have a list of Marcan miracles with their Matthean and Lucan parallels on my site. Perhaps you could run through them and explain why you think nearly all of them happened at night or early in the morning.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 07:16 AM   #103
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Thanks again Ben for that Suetonius quote. I greatly value it for the Octavius dream of the sun rising from Atia's womb (which btw the Protevangelium asserts happened for real when baby Jesus appeared out of Mary's womb). Luke relocates the shining "glory of the Lord" to the shepherds in the field. Matthew has Venus leading the wise men. If you happen on another virgin birth taking place at night (or in a dark enclosure) with some prominent motif of luminosity, please, send it along.

Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:12 AM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
No, I did not notice that. Nor do I think it is true. I have a list of Marcan miracles with their Matthean and Lucan parallels on my site. Perhaps you could run through them and explain why you think nearly all of them happened at night or early in the morning.

Ben.
Let us leave aside healings and exorcisms as a separate category of transference. (The Gerasene demoniac is a special category because it does involve a nature miracle as well). For the nature miracles, and transformations of Jesus, the night motives are these:

Mark 4:35 (calming the storm): on that day when evening had come, he said to them, 'let us go to the other side'

Mark 5:1-2 (Gerasene demoniac) takes place immediately after: they came to the other side of the sea, to the country of the Gerasenes, and when he had come out of the boat....

Mark 6:35 (feeding the multitudes): This is a lonely place and the hour is now late.

Mark 6:48 (walking on the sea): and about the fourth watch of the night he came to them, walking on the sea

Mark 16:2 (empty tomb): and very early on the first day of the week they went to the tomb.... (cf Jn 20:1)

Mt 2:2 (nativity): 'for we have seen his star in the Eest, and have come to worship him.

Lk 2:8-9 (nativity): '....shepherds out in the field keeping watch over their flock by night. And an angel of the Lord appeared to them and the glory of the Lord shone around them....

Luke 9:32 (transfiguration): Now Peter and those who were with him were heavy with sleep and when they wakened they saw his glory....

Mt 21:18 (the fig tree curse): in the morning, as he was returning to the city...

Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:31 AM   #105
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus View Post
What do we have as the date for when the Augustus cult added a 'miraculous' conception ? Beyond the 2nd century Suetonius writing, referencing an earlier writing, do we have any other evidence of this aspect of the Augustus cult?
After doing a little more digging around, I see that the epigram by Domitius Marsus (Epigr. Bob. 39f. [Munari]) - ante omnes alias felix tamen hoc ego dicor / sive hominem femina peperi sive deum -- also deals with "this aspect of the Augustus cult". Cf. G. Binder, [I]Aeneas und Augustus. Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis[/I (Meisenheim am Glan [Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 38] 1971), 252-253.

And since the epigram dates from from 43/42 BCE ...

Jeffrey Gibson
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:32 AM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
Thanks again Ben for that Suetonius quote.
No problem.

Quote:
If you happen on another virgin birth taking place at night (or in a dark enclosure) with some prominent motif of luminosity, please, send it along.
I shall. And, if you ever get the itch to support your other parallels with primary texts, please do.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:40 AM   #107
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
Let us leave aside healings and exorcisms as a separate category of transference.
I see. If we slice the evidence just so, and ignore a couple of anomalies, it will say what we want it to say.

Quote:
Mark 6:35 (feeding the multitudes): This is a lonely place and the hour is now late.
This is a simple misunderstanding on your part. The hour was late with respect to eating, not sleeping. Lunch was going to be late. Mark 6.47 makes clear that evening had not yet arrived even after the crowds ate. The feeding was a daytime miracle.

Quote:
Mark 16:2 (empty tomb): and very early on the first day of the week they went to the tomb.... (cf Jn 20:1)
The miracle had already happened. Stumbling upon an empty tomb is not a miracle in itself.

Quote:
Mt 21:18 (the fig tree curse): in the morning, as he was returning to the city...
The miracle had already happened. But how early does this have to be anyway? If your criteria extend to any part of the morning, any part of the evening, and any part of the night, all that is left is the afternoon.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:57 AM   #108
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
Compare Matthew 1.20:
...that which has been conceived [gennhqen] in her is from [ek] the Holy Spirit.
Had Matthew wished to make the explicit point that the holy spirit (neuter in Greek) was the father, he could have easily said that the holy spirit begat [egennhsen] Jesus. Instead, he has the main verb in the passive voice and the spirit following the preposition [ek], almost in a feminine way.
Indeed, quite interesting. I agree that both Mat and Luke are beating around the bush, perhaps so as not to set it on fire. Still, if it takes two to tango, then the "ek" would indicate the holy spirit as Maria's partner. The feminine form into which Mat puts this may again be linked to the deity's transcendence, no crude insertion of male parts e.g. As you say:
Quote:
I am not ruling out that Matthew has some kind of divine impregnation in mind. I just think we ought to be careful how far we press the point.
It would no doubt not do to try and imagine some sort of deity-Maria sex-scene here (while that often is correct in Zeus' many conquests).
Quote:
I would say it is more likely Luke is being quite careful not to say something like: And the Lord God (or the holy spirit, or the power of the most high) will beget a child. That would have been clear. What we are given is shadowy (forgive the pun).
Careful, yes, but the "dio" makes, I think, the intended meaning unmistakable.

Gerard Stafleu
gstafleu is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 09:01 AM   #109
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gstafleu View Post
Careful, yes, but the "dio" makes, I think, the intended meaning unmistakable.
What "dio"??

JG
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 09:01 AM   #110
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
I see. If we slice the evidence just so, and ignore a couple of anomalies, it will say what we want it to say.
I always think of the healings and exorcisms as a separate category of miracles. I would even go so far as to consider them historically possible, given that Televangelists can still perform them today.

Gerard Stafleu
gstafleu is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.