Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-30-2004, 02:53 AM | #31 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
I have argued elsewhere that I think Peter and Cephas were two distinct figures. Paul uses "Cephas" exclusively -- oh except for the obvious interpolation in Gal 2:7-8 which suddenly mentions Peter in a dose of oecumenical unity. But even Galatians has its troubles. Who James, Cephas, and John were is difficult to divine from Paul, but apparently Jerusalemite messianists antagonistic to Paul and his gospel which he could go away and preach elsewhere. As to the name of James's mother, I would have preferred Wendy. Quote:
And you say, but there was a Pilate. And I'd say yes, and he may have been married to someone and an important man would have had servants. Stories write themselves and their characters multiply like rabbits. spin |
||
04-30-2004, 03:02 AM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
|
Well, the _cave,
As I have now read Darrell Doughty's piece on the Pliny the Younger/Trajan letters, I see that there are some real problems with these too. Your last question is an interesting one - why during the reign of Pilate. It needs to be long enough ago that contrary evidence is difficult to array, and also before the destruction of the temple. But not so long before the destruction that it cannot be associated with it. The destruction of the Kingdom, the temple, and Jesus have to be roughly coincident. You have a lot of HB material you have to satisfy. JBapt has to be stuck in there. don't have time to work it all out, nor am I an expert. But the place in history was chosen out of a maximizing calculus. |
04-30-2004, 06:55 AM | #33 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|