Freethought & Rationalism Archive

chaoschristian · 03-09-2007, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stumpjumper

Yeah. That was a bit wierd...

Yes, weird and perhaps done on purpose to throw off the thread and launch it into 'under review' land?

**************

oh, now will you look at that.

ravenscape · 03-09-2007, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ResidentMumbai

Well, Rig's thread is teh closed.

I hope the nay-sayers are happy with themselves. Sketchfest especially.

Knowing meh and her track record with closed threads, it will be reopened. The damage is confined to a very short stretch of posts. It will be relatively easy to clean up.

Hallie · 03-09-2007, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ravenscape

Gotta give solomon credit. He pretty much singlehandedly hosed that thread to the point it had to be closed with a single post. That's some pretty effective trolling/derailing Almost up to buzzard standards.

AHAHAHA. I actually had to report him twice. The first time, I asked that no infractions be made and that the mods just delete his post.

Then he kept at it and I had to revoke my graciousness.

Stumpjumper · 03-09-2007, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ravenscape

Gotta give solomon credit. He pretty much singlehandedly hosed that thread to the point it had to be closed with a single post. That's some pretty effective trolling/derailing Almost up to buzzard standards.

It just goes to show that it pays to be dishonest at CF...

rigorist · 03-09-2007, 01:36 PM

The issue has been raised and some vagaries in the proposal have been clarified.

That's enough for me.

praying · 03-09-2007, 01:39 PM

I

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazy Liz

Now you're talking about commercial enterprises, where people are hired, not communities where people gather or volunteer for a variety of reasons, rather than being selected.

I disagree that you can't transfer the philosophy of making a mission successful from a business to a community, organization etc. No matter the organization if the mission isn’t articulated clearly and/or clearly defined with exact steps to execute the mission and readjusted as necessary the mission just becomes something that gets trotted out as a slogan, look we believe X. That is a major part of problem with CF’s mission; it is a single line statement with no direction as to how it will be achieved, or even why it is good.

BelindaP · 03-09-2007, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ResidentMumbai

Was anyone else HIGHLY sketched out by the latest response to me in the Blank icons thread??

I feel kind of ill...

Yeah. However, I think meh will take care of it. The interesting thing will be if he tries to appeal the warning/infraction that he draws from this. He certainly can't argue that he wasn't warned.

I'm even mocking him with my avatar right now.

BelindaP · 03-09-2007, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazy Liz

Erwin has been known to cave when a group of people he considers influential threaten to to leave en masse.

Are the conciliators influential?

ravenscape · 03-09-2007, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BelindaP

Are the conciliators influential?

Probably not influential enough. In this context, numbers count.

praying · 03-09-2007, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BelindaP

Are the conciliators influential?

How do I break this to you gently?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

03-09-2007, 01:36 PM	#85
rigorist Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: The Court of the Weirdo King Posts: 8,818	The issue has been raised and some vagaries in the proposal have been clarified. That's enough for me.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.