FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-23-2012, 06:22 PM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

To provide a non Christian source for early existence of Christians getting it more tightly bound to the first century Jesus story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
What's wrong with a piece of outside evidence composed to reinforce certain beliefs?
Even in this century it's been done........they invented the story of the babies being removed from incubators in Kuwait by the Iraqis in 1990 when it was a bald faced lie. But it helped their case for the war.....

In war, the first casualty is truth. There's a pattern to building up a fervor for war by painting the enemy as subhuman.

Can you articulate any particular reason for a 15th century priest to invent a not especially flattering reference to Christianity in the early 2nd century?
Duvduv is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 06:32 PM   #42
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
To provide a non Christian source for early existence of Christians getting it more tightly bound to the first century Jesus story.
Why would a Catholic priest care about non Christian sources? Why forge something so ambiguous, with no mention of Jesus or the first century story, or a virgin birth or crucifixion or any other real tie to Christianity?

It doesn't matter when Christianity started. It doesn't make Christianity true if it can be trace to the first century.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 06:41 PM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

It certainly adds to the view of the early existence of Christian communities. Very early in fact. And without all the doctrine it carries an air of authenticity by Romans.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 01:35 AM   #44
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
....My post was in response to Duvduv's suggestion that the 15th century priest Giacondo composed the entire letter.

In the 15th century, a Catholic priest would have no reason to try to establish the mere existence of Christianity in the early 2nd century. A priest would assume that Acts of the Apostles was enough evidence for anyone, so the motive to forge this letter is lacking.
Your claim is NOT logical at all because you really have NO way of knowing what ALL priests knew in the 15th century.

The Pliny letter may well have been manipulated.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 05:58 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default

Hi Toto,

Your points are well taken. Also we have the evidence of Tertullian referring to the correspondence in his Apology at the beginning of the Third century.

We already see in Tertullian that he is trying to make the Bithynian Christian cult more Jewish.
We can compare the oath Tertullian says they took with the ten commandments and what we find in our present version of Pliny:
  Ten Commandments Pliny's Bithynian Christian Oath Tertullian Bithynian Christian Oath
1 no other gods before me. not commit fraud continue their form of worship
2 not make graven images not to steal not commit murder
3 not take Lord's name in vain not to commit adultery not to commit adultery
4 remember Sabbath not to lie about a trust not to commit fraud
5 honor father and mother to return a trust when asked not to commit all other sorts of wickedness
6 not kill    
7 not commit adultery    
8 not steal    
9 not bear false witness against neighbor    
10 not covert neighbor's house, wife, slave,property    

We can see that only two out of five things in Pliny's oath matches the ten commandments - not stealing and not committing adultery. The other three: not commiting fraud, not lying about a trust (something that someone gives you) and returning a trust do not match the ten Hebrew commandments. Tertullian, either remembering it wrong, and/or trying to make the Bithynians sound more Hebrew adds in murder and continuing their form of worship.

Oaths were ubiquitous in ancient Greek and Roman society. The one that the Bithynian Christians take seems concerned mostly with a "trust" and making sure that they give it back. The resemblance to the Hebrew Ten Commandments is slight and possibly just coincidental.

Warmly,

Jay Raskin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
To provide a non Christian source for early existence of Christians getting it more tightly bound to the first century Jesus story.
Why would a Catholic priest care about non Christian sources? Why forge something so ambiguous, with no mention of Jesus or the first century story, or a virgin birth or crucifixion or any other real tie to Christianity?

It doesn't matter when Christianity started. It doesn't make Christianity true if it can be trace to the first century.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 09:23 AM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Reading the Pliny version it doesn't sound to me as if they were specifically referring to mistaken ten commandments but merely there own set of rules in their particular brotherhood/society/sect.
Giacondo didn't have to make up the whole letter from scratch. All he had to do was combine something he found with a few Christian references to give it that down home feeling of the existence of a Christian sect in faraway Bithynia back in the second century.
These kinds of composites would have an echo of the pauline epistles as composites as well.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 01:29 PM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Is this guy taking over for Pete in proselytizing this nonsense? How do you describe what is reasonable to an unreasonable mind?
stephan huller is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 02:00 PM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Sorry some of us can't be members of the Alpha team like Mr. Huller is........Or a member of the Church of Because I Said So.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 08-25-2012, 06:20 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Is this guy taking over for Pete in proselytizing this nonsense? How do you describe what is reasonable to an unreasonable mind?
With pincers.

After a while, you can see where the Spanish Inquisition were coming from.
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 08-25-2012, 06:22 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
AA, I already suggested resolving this matter by checking with the 15th century priest Giacondo who is alleged to have "discovered" the Pliny letter, unknown anytime before.
Giacondo who?

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.