FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-04-2005, 06:52 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
It is hard to reconcile competent governance with unremitting contempt for Judaism, especially since Pilate did not remove any high priests -- it is hard to imagine that he had good relations with the high priests but had contempt for Judaism. IMHO the picture in Philo and Josephus is skewed (and the more I read Josephus, the less I trust of his "history").
I think Philo's 'Ad Gaium' is considerably more problematic as history than Josephus. 'Ad Gaium' is a polemic rather than a history and Philo blackens Pilate's character in order to give a favourable portrayal of Tiberius.

As to the contrast between Pilate in the Gospels and Pilate in Josephus. I don't think the picture of Pilate in Mark is really incompatible with the impression of Pilate given by Josephus. The later gospels may be another matter.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 02-04-2005, 07:48 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Do Philo and Josephus outright contradict each other on Pilate? Or is it merely that Philo is more vociferous than Josephus?
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 02-04-2005, 11:10 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
Do Philo and Josephus outright contradict each other on Pilate? Or is it merely that Philo is more vociferous than Josephus?
At face value they don't overlap enough to contradict each other.

However some scholars hold that the 'Iconic Standards' incident in Josephus 'War' Book 2 chapter 9 and Antiquities Book 18 chapter 3, is really the same incident as the 'Golden Shields' incident in Philo 'Ad Gaium' section 38.

If so at least one and probably both are giving a distorted view of the incident.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.