FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-14-2008, 10:29 AM   #81
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
No, I'm simply noting that your repeated assertion that Jesus does not exist is certainly and clearly a belief.
Now who is the one wasting valuable beer time?

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 05-14-2008, 11:31 AM   #82
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
You are the one trying to go around my NON-BELIEF.
No, I'm simply noting that your repeated assertion that Jesus does not exist is certainly and clearly a belief.



Yes. Do you not understand that an assertion that Jesus did not exist goes beyond a mere "lack of belief"?

Quote:
Yet, you simply continue with your strawman.
It certainly is not a strawman because your repeated assertions of your belief that Jesus did not exist are readily available to any search of your posts.

Each and every time you have made that assertion, you have been stating your belief about Jesus.
My BELIEF about Jesus is NOTHING.

HJers have BELIEF about Jesus, some believe he was a man and not a God, some Christians BELIEVE Jesus was God and man.

I BELIEVE NOTHING about Jesus.

Jesus was NOTHING. I cannot BELIEVE anything about him.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 05-14-2008, 11:49 AM   #83
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
You are the one trying to go around my NON-BELIEF.
Do you not understand that an assertion that Jesus did not exist goes beyond a mere "lack of belief"?
If Obssession saw herself as mere Option she would find there is no point to herself at all.

Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:47 PM   #84
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Jesus was NOTHING. I cannot BELIEVE anything about him.
I'm glad to hear you will no longer assert that Jesus did not exist. :thumbs:
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 05-14-2008, 11:09 PM   #85
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Jesus was NOTHING. I cannot BELIEVE anything about him.
I'm glad to hear you will no longer assert that Jesus did not exist. :thumbs:
Asserting that Jesus was nothing is asserting something about him.
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 06:08 AM   #86
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solitary Man View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post

I'm glad to hear you will no longer assert that Jesus did not exist. :thumbs:
Asserting that Jesus was nothing is asserting something about him.
Asserting that nothing was nothing is asserting nothing about nothing.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:28 AM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

No, asserting that nothing is nothing is asserting something about nothing.
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:36 AM   #88
2-J
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 179
Default

Look, can we just agree on this basic point: that believing Jesus did not exist is more substantive, as a position it involves more commitment, than having absolutely no opinion on whether he existed.
2-J is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:47 AM   #89
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2-J View Post
Look, can we just agree on this basic point: that believing Jesus did not exist is more substantive, as a position it involves more commitment, than having absolutely no opinion on whether he existed.
Except aa denies this.
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:20 AM   #90
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2-J View Post
Look, can we just agree on this basic point: that believing Jesus did not exist is more substantive, as a position it involves more commitment, than having absolutely no opinion on whether he existed.

A thing that does not exist is NOTHING.

If JESUS did not exist, JESUS is NOTHING.

There is just NOTHING to believe, substantially.
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.