FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-17-2008, 02:19 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 8,650
Default an arrogant, dense, projecting fundie for the ages

My spidey sense says this guy, Call them like I see them, is not a common internet troll; he's a genuinely batshit insane fundie Christian. (That's in the DSM-IV, right?) He's truly an arrogant, dense, projecting fundie for the ages. And his posts are just too scary-funny to keep to myself.

He jumped into this thread on another board, both guns blazing, in response to a post I made, where I was defending the integrity of theists. Thus far in the thread, he has responded to me and one other atheist 17 times. Here are excerpts from all 17 posts, with emphasis added to highlight points at which your already-stressed irony meters will explode:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Call them like I see them
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stacey Melissa
I don't believe everyone else is delusional. I think the vast majority of theists are just mistaken.
1. I know I am not mistaken and I know that there is a God of creation.
I do know that you are mistaken in saying that there is no God, but in your delusion you do not think you could be mistaken only others. If truth was in your path you would trip over it and not recognize it since you are to busy embracing and dancing with the falsehood of atheism.

2. May I ask Miss spacey, what century did the 37 ce occur in?

3. The one thing I do not know is if you would be honest with yourself that you came to that conclusion or even be intellectually capable of understanding the as i take you step by step through to that knowledge.

Frankly, reading your posts I do not believe you have the honesty, nor the intellect. I believe you are an ignoramus that has your mind made up and has no desire to have your thoughts confused with facts or logic.

4. The only thing you have come close to proving is that you are either trying out for the role as the village idiot or that you have already gotten the role.

... I believe you speak clearly concerning your sanity or lack thereof.

You want to remain the ignoramus, go for it. There is no crime in acting stupid so no one will lock you up.

If you ever want to talk with logic look me up, but as long as you post like that I will feel fully justified in believing you are mentally deficient along with being morally deficient.

5. You are stupid. The reasoning of Jesus having to have a flat earth to support your warped ideas about the Bible and God show your stupidity.
... The only stupid person I see is you.

6. A moral decent man that would never lie, never bash some one, is easy to get along with will never be something that a person would use to describe you.
... I have called you stupid and you continually back me up in the manner in which you post.

... You expose yourself for what you are, an intellectually deficient person who has decided there is no God so that you somehow feel you may do and act as you please, and you readily point out to the people of the Franklin County area exactly what it would be like if we had no religion. Snot nosed actions and words like yours would be the norm of how one would be living.
No Religion - Indeed a very scary thought!

7. You are the stupid one for attempting to talk about something of which you have no knowledge, yet you do it continually along with a few other of the atheist that are as ignorant as you are.
You may make all the demeaning remarks you desire to make. What you do is show those everyone what it would really be like with no religion. You and your type are scary!

8. I find you ignorant, dull intellectually, and a brat of a kid. If I ever saw one who was really interested when they asked a question, instead of the immature kid that is asking the question as a smart mouth, then I would give you an honest answer, but you may post all the comments and questions with your attitude, and I will continue to call you ignorant and stupid, because you indeed are ignorant and you are stupid because you love to remain ignorant.

9. I have no respect for your idiocy. It is not abusive to tell one that they are acting line a snot nose brat when they are. You are the one that is abusive because you can not refute what I said, thus you have to attempt some personal insult.
You can lie to yourself, you can lie to others as you have lied to me. Some may believe you especially the gang of atheist that want to claim they are not a religion but quickly gang up on anyone who states their belief in God. Fortunately, most will have the intelligence to see right through your lies and your bigotry.
I will not ever respect your actions as long as you act the bigot and the idiot you have been acting.

10. I am not going to work with some immature brat that does not agree with me and every reply is an attempt at demeaning me even if the attempt is pitiful.

I won't even bother answering the remainder of your ranting in this post, nor will I answer anymore of your immature babbling

11. I do reply harshly to the lies and the ignorance that many have used. I have replied harshly to you because you are attempting to talk about something of which you have minimal knowledge, but you started the bashing and the insults because of an anger that you seem to have for me because I state there is a God.

12. You say that you want to be logical, but I believe that is not your desire at all.
... I know the second question seems demeaning, but I think you are really a big chicken that is afraid to answer straight questions.

13. If you had not been so uncivil then you would not have ever been treated as the elitist snot that you act like.
Truth is not one atheist wants to debate anything, nor listen to any logic.

14. I find it amazing how bright you want to present yourself, but how dense you become when a comment is made that you feel uncomfortable about.
I attempted to be civil to you, but it does no good.
You tell others how you want to take the high road, but then you reply in your normal snot nosed, egotistical manner as though you believe that you somehow are the genius when in fact you still remain ignorant, but you are indeed proud of your ignorance.

15. You use more words to say, "I do not know what I am ranting about", then most people.
I do not care about Socrates, I follow the God of creation. The all powerful God that does not ask silly questions to test one to get answers pleasing to their thoughts.

16. Congratulations, in another year or two maybe you will be sensible enough to have a decent conversation.

... Every post you have to put your stupidity on display.

Come back when you get a high school diploma and quit feeding me BS about a college logic class. I have called you ignorant, stupid and delusional and I have done it with facts that you have provided.

17. Stacy, my only reply to you until you grow up an get an education or start to show you have a shred of intelligence is and will be;
You are ignorant and proud of your ignorance.

... Thus, you continually speak from ignorance.
You are ignorant and proud of it, your ranting advertises it.
Stacey Melissa is offline  
Old 03-17-2008, 02:21 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 8,650
Default

Mod note: I'm moving my own thread to ~E~, since it's about another board.

Stacey Melissa
Humor Moderator
Stacey Melissa is offline  
Old 03-17-2008, 05:13 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 3,890
Default

I clicked on to is profile to see his posts in other threads, and they are all like that. I wouldn't say necessarily "crazy" as in "insane", but I would say quite possibly a semi-moron. He simply argues by heeping abuse on people, and it is extremely tedious abuse. Personally I enjoy engaging people such as him, since their ranting on topics like religion and George W. Bush are more eloquent denunciations of these things than I can bother to muster.
Styrofoamdeity is offline  
Old 03-17-2008, 06:38 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 8,650
Default

Well damn, if he's not truly batshit insane, then I don't even have to feel that little tinge of guilt for milking his abuse for the bad publicity it brings to his religion.

But yeah, it was looking through his other posts that let me know he's not a Poe or a troll.
Stacey Melissa is offline  
Old 03-17-2008, 06:49 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 8,650
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Styrofoamdeity View Post
Personally I enjoy engaging people such as him, since their ranting on topics like religion and George W. Bush are more eloquent denunciations of these things than I can bother to muster.
Ya know, signing up at Topix is a piece of cake, and this particular fundie has all the tedium you could ever want. His insults have all the linguistic variety of a can of baked beans. Hint, hint.
Stacey Melissa is offline  
Old 03-17-2008, 10:17 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Henderson, NV (outside of Las Vegas)
Posts: 1,278
Default

Blah Blah Blah............it's like playing chess with pigeons.

They shit on the board, knock the pieces over, then fly back to their flock and declare victory.
Smohg is offline  
Old 03-18-2008, 12:12 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
Default

Quote:
2. May I ask Miss spacey, what century did the 37 ce occur in?
...
GenesisNemesis is offline  
Old 03-18-2008, 12:47 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 8,650
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenesisNemesis View Post
Quote:
2. May I ask Miss spacey, what century did the 37 ce occur in?
...
The context behind that... he said we had manuscripts from Josephus dating to the early first century. I said, no, Josephus wasn't even born in the early first century; he was born in 37CE, and only wrote Antiquities of the Jews in 93CE, which would have made manuscripts from the early first century impossible. And then he gave the above quote. His problem was that he made the little goof of thinking we have manuscripts from ~100CE, and called that the "first century" instead of "second century". But he's totally unable to admit even the smallest mistake, so he went on that rant instead admitting an itty bitty mistake. I hope he's not Catholic, or else that personality trait could make Confessions rather torturous for him.
Stacey Melissa is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 01:55 AM   #9
Mav
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: a house
Posts: 582
Default

Stacy, Can I play with him....pleeeeeease?! I'm running out of posters over at www.proofdirectory.com, I'm down to just one or 2 posters over there now. I have one there now named Jeremiah that thinks he's a prophet...but claims he's not a prophet. So I call him the Prophet of No Proof. Should be a fun read for you all: http://www.proofdirectory.com/forums...&sd=a&start=40
Dam, I'm like a cat looking for a new ball of yarn.
I read though Call them like I see them's posts there, and he is really focused on you Stacy. His posting reminds me of a child acting up to get a parents attention.
So what is your plan on dealing with him?

Mav
Mav is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 02:45 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: auckland nz
Posts: 18,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stacey Melissa View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenesisNemesis View Post

...
The context behind that... he said we had manuscripts from Josephus dating to the early first century. I said, no, Josephus wasn't even born in the early first century; he was born in 37CE, and only wrote Antiquities of the Jews in 93CE, which would have made manuscripts from the early first century impossible. And then he gave the above quote. His problem was that he made the little goof of thinking we have manuscripts from ~100CE, and called that the "first century" instead of "second century". But he's totally unable to admit even the smallest mistake, so he went on that rant instead admitting an itty bitty mistake. I hope he's not Catholic, or else that personality trait could make Confessions rather torturous for him.
whether 37CE is classed as 'early' 1st century is debateable I suppose but hardly stupid.
(the restof his post is stupid though)
NZSkep is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.