Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-19-2005, 06:25 AM | #21 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
Does anyone know how thoroughly the other one-of-a-kind manuscripts that Smith found at Mar Saba have been analyzed (eg. the "fragments of Scholia on Sophocles' Ajax")?
In the article in the journal Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies Vol. 3 (1960), Smith has an article on this other discovery of his at the same monastery, Mar Saba, where he found Secret Mark. Quote:
Quote:
Regardless, I'm curious about whether this manuscript has been tested for signs of forgery. As Vork has pointed out before in slightly differing words, where there is one forgery, there are usually more. |
||
05-19-2005, 01:06 PM | #22 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,146
|
Quote:
Sure, some of these themes may seem somewhat uncanny from our present day perspective... But also it would certainly be more than a little uncanny that, for example, assuming SecMk is a forgery, Thomas Talley would independently discover significant supporting evidence for its authenticity -- and for Jesus' baptising activities more generally -- in little known Egyptian patristic accounts... Thomas Talley in support of Secret Mark http://www.trends.ca/~yuku/bbl/talley.htm There's a simple fact that, up to now, nobody has been able to formulate any sort of a coherent theory of forgery involving Smith. This has never been done because, as soon as one starts to build such a theory, it'll be obvious right away just how preposterous the whole thing is. My prediction is that Carlson will never offer any comprehensible and logical theory of forgery. He'll simply never be able to do this. What he'll offer us instead will be more of what Haran has done in this post -- a lot more of vague hints, suggestions, and insinuations, a whole concatenation of them. And then there'll be this knowing smirk, "You see! Everything is clear as day, it's a forgery!" But there'll never be any "smoking guns". And yet, I have lots of smoking guns right here, Secret Mark is authentic! http://www.trends.ca/~yuku/bbl/secmk.htm Cheers, Yuri. |
|
05-19-2005, 01:14 PM | #23 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,146
|
Quote:
Yuri. |
|
05-19-2005, 04:02 PM | #24 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
You dog! :rolling: :rolling: That is a kick-ass coincidence of dates. I've always maintained that was a dry-run for Sec Mark. What does the title mean? Euchai tou luchnikou kai tou orthrou Also, Ba'al Shem -- what does that mean? Have the scholia been translated into English? They might contain something interesting. |
|
05-19-2005, 04:44 PM | #25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
I've looked at the scholia. They are written in what looks like an earlier hand. Smith said 15th century, and he claims that they basically track the published scholia with some variants. Perhaps I may take another look at these again some time. I think that Smith got lucky and found something he could honestly publish. After all, he did use it to ask Quesnell why he didn't challenge that publication and Q. had to sputter some kind of answer. Stephen |
|
05-19-2005, 06:53 PM | #26 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
Vorkosigan |
|
05-19-2005, 08:32 PM | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
Hasidism Image of Hasidim Yuri, come over to the dark side... :devil3: |
|
05-19-2005, 09:17 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
If you're interested:
Baal Shem Tov's letter (mentioned by Smith/containing the date 1746) - toward the bottom of the page |
05-20-2005, 09:50 AM | #29 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Andrew Criddle |
|
05-21-2005, 12:22 PM | #30 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
EUCAI TOU LUCNIKOU KAI TOU ORQROU I was wondering why you translated EUCAI as 'blessings'? I thought EULOGIA translated as 'blessings' and EUCAI was the plural of EUCH (which is derived from EUCOMAI) and means 'prayers', or 'vows'. I have not been able to locate the word LUCNIKOU, after a brief search in Lidell-Scott, BDAG, and others. It appears to be related to lamp/lampstand, but the 'KOU' is throwing me at the moment. Do lamps/lampstands somehow signify vesper, or the evening? I suppose I would have translated it something like 'Prayers of the evening and of the dawn', in a somewhat literal fashion, or 'Evening and morning prayers' (of course, if LUCNIKOU can mean evening).... Am I wrong? Sorry, I know this is a hair off topic, but I love Greek and the opportunity to learn something I didn't know. By the way, I believe Ba'al is a title of sorts that means "Lord" or "Master" in Hebrew, so Baal Shem would loosely translate as "Lord, or Master, of The Name". |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|