FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2009, 12:38 PM   #41
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virtually right here where you are
Posts: 11,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lógos Sokratikós View Post

That is absolutely true in all logic. Given, of course that you have already ascertained the truth value of your premises, which is, alas, Christian apologists' ever-yet to be completed task, those of us who don't believe but who nevertheless are tormented by their incessant slogans are still waiting thousands of years for.
Don't be impatient....its sure to come.
Well, how many people without the demonstration have to die and go to hell before Jehovah thinks it's time? How some people can think such a deal may be fair, is a challenge to psychiatric science.
Lógos Sokratikós is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 12:46 PM   #42
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lógos Sokratikós View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

Don't be impatient....its sure to come.
Well, how many people without the demonstration have to die and go to hell before Jehovah thinks it's time? How can some people think such a deal is fair, is a challenge to psychiatry.
I'm going to let Peter answer this one:

"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousands years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his propmise, as some men count slackness; but longsuffering to usward, AND NOT WILLING THAT ANY SHOULD PERISH, BUT THAT ALL SHOULD COME TO REPENTANCE." II Peter 3:8-9


Why thank you Peter!
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:05 PM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Virginina
Posts: 4,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lógos Sokratikós View Post

Well, how many people without the demonstration have to die and go to hell before Jehovah thinks it's time? How can some people think such a deal is fair, is a challenge to psychiatry.
I'm going to let Peter answer this one:

"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousands years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his propmise, as some men count slackness; but longsuffering to usward, AND NOT WILLING THAT ANY SHOULD PERISH, BUT THAT ALL SHOULD COME TO REPENTANCE." II Peter 3:8-9


Why thank you Peter!


Again skeptics=2000+ being correct
Doomsayers= 0

the record speaks for itself Peter.
WVIncagold is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:09 PM   #44
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virtually right here where you are
Posts: 11,138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lógos Sokratikós View Post

Well, how many people without the demonstration have to die and go to hell before Jehovah thinks it's time? How can some people think such a deal is fair, is a challenge to psychiatry.
I'm going to let Peter answer this one:

"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousands years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his propmise, as some men count slackness; but longsuffering to usward, AND NOT WILLING THAT ANY SHOULD PERISH, BUT THAT ALL SHOULD COME TO REPENTANCE." II Peter 3:8-9


Why thank you Peter!
But if they don't believe due to lack of the stuff that would make them believe, they perish. Thank you Peter, for pointing out the absurdity.
Lógos Sokratikós is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:23 PM   #45
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Hey wait a minute. Skeptics point out a particulary embarrassing part of the Holy Word, and we can't get a good Christian in here to say that it was metaphor, or overridden by Jesus sacrifice or Paul's reinterpretation, or some other lame excuse? We only have Christians who seem to support stoning rebellious kids?
Toto is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:29 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Hey wait a minute. Skeptics point out a particulary embarrassing part of the Holy Word, and we can't get a good Christian in here to say that it was metaphor, or overridden by Jesus sacrifice or Paul's reinterpretation, or some other lame excuse? We only have Christians who seem to support stoning rebellious kids?
How about this:

Peter is the "rock" foundation of the church
Rebellious sons are the Jews
Therefore throwing Peter at Jews is Jesus' will (?)

sorry, I'm out of practice with this stuff :Cheeky:
bacht is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:39 PM   #47
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virtually right here where you are
Posts: 11,138
Default

LOL.
Silly, but LOL.
Lógos Sokratikós is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 04:03 PM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

I am fully confident that eternity did not begin, as it were, only yesterday,
ten thousands of years, less enduring than a single spark of small campfire,
upon the face of that great vastness of all of eternity.
The superstitions, and religious fables of men, shall not stand the test of time.
A trite and foolish claim made just yesterday, is already fading, and passing away.
I rejoice that none will regard this stupidity one hundred million years from now.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 05:59 PM   #49
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeekingKnowledge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
If you give your seed to Molech, ya get stoned. (Lev 20:2)
If you've got a "familiar spirit", ya get stoned. (Lev 20:27)
If you say bad things about god, ya get stoned. (Lev 24:11-16)
If you work on the sabbath, ya get stoned. (Num 15:32-35)
If you check out the opposition gods, ya get stoned. (Deut 13:6-10, 17:2-5)
If you grow up a stubborn and rebellious son, ya get stoned. (Deut 21:18-21)
If you've lost your virginity before your betrothed takes it (and you're a damsel), ya get stoned (Deut 22:20-21)

We should all get stoned.
I like this, can I quote it elsewhere?
Sure, just as long as you use the fuller version as modified above to include the stubborn and rebellious son!


spin
spin is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 06:33 PM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by storytime View Post


Your points are of course arguable. Why would you think non Jewish practices were "evil anarchists Pagan?"

Jesus offered nothing to Gentiles, but seemed to be receptive of their desire to convert to Judaism. "Salvation iis of the Jews". Salvation was not of Gentiles. Probably because salvation had need of laws to transgress before redemption could be valued.
Read the history of Pagan nations.


If nations adopted the teachings of Jesus sincerely corruption and discord would be close to non-existant. The Reformation brought about freedom never before experienced in any Gentile nation and that freedom was established on Christian morality.....Jesus offered freedom to Gentiles....and we in America only tasted a small measure of it and that was great....imagine if the west had adopted 100% the teachings of Christ.

Sugar, you should consider reading the bible without including yourself in the story. That's the number one problem with Christians I think, they just can't accept the bible story as only a Jewish legend. You try to interpret things Jewish that doesn't fit the then Jewish way of thinking.

If nations adopted the teachings of Jesus, they'd become Jewish nations. You fail to consider that Jesus was Jewish and think him to be a godman for all people. He was not. The arguments Jesus presented was in debate with his own people and leaders. Jesus didn't go into Rome and declare that Roman citizens should follow him. He did, however, say that he was not sent to condemn the world. His sole purpose was to save the lost sheep in the house of Israel. "I am sent to none but the lost sheep in the house of Israel." As a rabbi and teacher, he taught a doctrine diferent than the Pharisees and Sadducees. He made a distinction of his doctrine from theirs when he spoke to them and said: "It is written in your law.." and he went on to call the Pharisees children of the devil. Jesus was insulting and offensive to the Pharisees whom he acknowledged as being children of Abraham, and therein under the covenant of Abraham. The Pharisees were Jews and Jesus was a Jew who evidently disagreed with them on points of doctrine. And.. none of those things had anything to do with Gentiles or Rome or Egypt or any other people.
storytime is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:50 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.