![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
#11 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
|
By assuming there is some sort of plot or plan to impose IIDB governance structures on CF. Now, my read on your motives is very, very tenuous on this point, so I will freely reverse my opinion if I am mistaken.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Internet Fidel
Posts: 2,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,112
|
Quote:
Obviously you could not be trying to impose IIDB governance structure on Cf because as you pointed out you are not organized enough to have a structure to impose on anyone . That is why I think it a good idea to impose the appeal structure of CF on IIDB , so that the posters here can feel the new openness and transparency . I also think that some of us non staff could be asked to help develop the rules for IIDB ... What do you think of us imposing CFs structure on IIDB?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Internet Fidel
Posts: 2,123
|
Might be good to see how well a Ombudsmom works here?
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,954
|
Quote:
Quote:
good one, Mommy!
|
||
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|