Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-24-2012, 09:59 AM | #211 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Originally Posted by*Minimalist*Quote:"Every single source that mentionsJesus up until the 18th centuryassumes that he actually existed."
Im not so sure ehrman's right here. to "exist" implies that for two thousand years jesus was thought to have "come into being" at his birth. that's simply not true. no one but the heretics thought this and only a handful of them. this is what AMERICANS think. that's all. he's appealing to popular ignorance |
03-24-2012, 10:33 AM | #212 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
Otherwise - lets have you supporting this statement from your book: Re Marcus Agrippa (II) Quote:
|
||
03-24-2012, 10:44 AM | #213 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I have long said that the story of jesus COULD have been based on a historical person and i still believe that is true. nevertheless i have also come to the conclusion that jesus was originally conceived as a heavemly hypostasis. the person on the cross wasnt jesus (at least originally). irenaeus makes clear that the gospel of mark was written with two separate figures in mind - jesus and christ. tertullian says that the jesus spirit left the guy on the cross at eloi, eloi.
There are ways to piece this together. it just takes time |
03-24-2012, 10:49 AM | #214 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
Re Marcus Agrippa (II) Quote:
How about a straight answer this time? PS - how about a quotation re the "could" - that Jesus "could" be based upon a historical person. |
||
03-24-2012, 11:19 AM | #215 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
The question of who is mark has little to do with the question of who is jesus
|
03-24-2012, 11:35 AM | #216 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
Stephan, I won't keep this up - your obviously not going to give a straight answer here. In an earlier post you mentioned a new book coming out that will deal with a mythical Jesus. Since this seems to be in direct opposition to the position taken in your book - The Real Messiah - I asked for clarification on your current position. Your title for that book - The Real Messiah suggests that the christian messiah figure, the gospel JC, was not the 'real' messiah - that the real messiah was Marcus Julius Agrippa (II). For that position to be upheld - obviously, the comparison must be between two flesh and blood figures. NOW - you are going the mythical route for Jesus - I have no problem with people changing their mind - but I do have a problem when people don't put their cards on the table. As far as I can now tell - your now a Jesus mythicist - albeit a closet one - maybe until that new book comes out.....Stephan Huller going to give us the definitive mythicist argument....now that is a turn for the books..... Oh, and by the way - don't forget to acknowledge all the hard work by the mythicists on FRDB that helped you along the way....:constern01: |
|
03-24-2012, 11:48 AM | #217 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
There are no certainties here. if you are writing books for a general readership you cant carry on three ot four discussions at the same time. the real messiah was about mark. there are traditions about mark which say he was a disciple of jesus. i chose to follow those traditions and ignore others. oden did the opposite in his african memory of mark. my next book will be about jesus
|
03-24-2012, 11:53 AM | #218 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
Come on Stephan - stop playing word games here. How about a straight answer to this question - are you, Stephan Huller, now a mythicist regarding the gospel Jesus? |
|
03-24-2012, 12:00 PM | #219 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Jesus was not the focus of that book. i am not a card carrying "mythicist." i just think i can add something to the discussion
|
03-24-2012, 12:08 PM | #220 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
|
Quote:
Oh, well, since there is no straight answer coming from you regarding the question: Stephan Huller are you a mythicist regarding the gospel Jesus - I'll just have to view you as in the closet.......until your definitive book on Jesus mythicism comes out.....:grin: PS - just had a look on your website blog - so the new book is : The Myth of Jesus Christ......? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|