FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2006, 09:41 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 7,588
Default

And what about other species?

There were only two of most of them… and how could they reproduce fast enough before being eaten by the remaining predators (if there were carcasses left by the Flood, I guess they would rot and become inedible for many of the predators relatively soon).

There are so many problems with the Flood, that it’s amazing how they still believe it. But then again, that could be said about many other fables.
Angra Mainyu is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 12:08 PM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 121
Default

how did other ethnicities come out of 8 people from the same race ?

and then get scattered all across the globe ?
QRUEL is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 12:40 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ima_realist View Post
Hi all, i'm new to this site. It's great to be able to see so many like-minded people and I look forward to some really good debates here.

Anyway, the thing that initially brought me here was an exchange I was having with a fundamentalist Christian on another forum. I proposed that the main problem behind the Adam and Eve and Noah's Ark storys is the idea of in-breeding. Surely the offspring resulting from Adam and Eve's children's copulation with the only other available humans, each other, would be crippled by physical and mental deficiencies. If not in the first few generations then soon after. I doubt we could have lasted longer than a hundred years or so, nevermind however long believers think we have been around.

He didn't really have answer other than that they might have been 'perfect genes' and that there was no mention of it here. I was just curious as to why it hasn't been mentioned before, or has been mentioned that much that no-one bothers to talk about it?
HI ima-realist!

The Intelligent design folks don't maintain that all genetic variation existed in the first creation. Instead, God created a molecular process by which the cells themselves could create variation "purposely, i.e. not random mutation.

Creation Science :down: explains that God programmed into the cell the process by which the cell purposefully edit genes, creating new alleles whenever necessary.


See Genetic Variability by Design.

It's useless to talk with these people. They will just invoke a Deus ex machina any time they get in a bind.

Jake Jones IV
jakejonesiv is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 01:57 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunny England.
Posts: 12
Default

Hi jake, I wholeheartedly agree with what you just said. It IS impossible to debate with these people and it hurts my head trying. They just don't want to see the truth and therefore they won't. I can't blame them though. I'd rather believe, as they do, that I am going to heaven rather than face the black abyss that in reality awaits us all! *sob*

You'd have thought that their whole 'purposeful mutation' spiel would be undermined by the horrible fact of life that is birth defects. I'm no biologist but I always thought they were un-beneficial random mutations. Hardly the work of a loving God. Those with them don't tend to survive (or didnt before modern science) hence the mutation doesn't get absorbed into the gene pool. It also works the opposite way aswell i'd imagine, with positive mutations making us what we are today. Survival of the fittest and all that...

They probaby have an answer for that aswell, if all else fails, blame Satan!
Ima_realist is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 12:32 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
IIRC, population genetics suggests a minimum of around 200 humans is required to provide the necessary variation to ensure the survival of the species.
Can you please elaborate?
hatsoff is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 08:17 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatsoff View Post
Can you please elaborate?
Without attempting to retrace my research steps, no. It is my recollection of studies I read a couple years ago.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 10-27-2006, 07:01 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicki View Post
....The arguments that refer to the "perfect genetics" of Adam and Eve do not "hold water" (sorry for the pun) because Noah and his descendents are the ones who populated the earth after the flood. Since they were born "after the fall" of humankind, the perfect gene argument is not valid.
Not saying I believe in it, but by perfect genes just means they're not carrying thousands of recessive(?) genes that cause problems including eyesight problems. These could just accumulate over time and don't need to be present from the beginning.
excreationist is offline  
Old 10-27-2006, 10:15 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

Has no-one here ever heard of miracles? Obviously God stepped in whenever necessary to prevent birth defects. You see, the world is perfectly logical -- and when it's not, a miracle can explain it.
Joan of Bark is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.