FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2005, 07:29 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas II
All of the above?
Correct.
Adora is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 07:45 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Default

If you go to Islamic board you will find that most muslims on the board seem to believe that Islam is special and deserve to rule and one day it will rule thanks to Allah.
Any deviation from such thought is to be condemned.
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 10:01 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Next smoke-filled cellar over from Preno.
Posts: 6,562
Default

hinduwoman and Kosh3,

I don't disagree with anything you said, but:

Most of the attitudes or problems you identify with Islam exist as well in some strands of Christianity. There are many Christians who want to bring about a Christian conquest of the world. I am sure you have heard of Cortes and Pizarro, for instance, but there are modern Christians, such as Falwell or Robertson who are of the same view.

Christianity historically has been VERY anti-woman. The older Christian sects, such as the Catholics, the Orthodox and the Copts still do not allow women preachers. Many Christian sects preach the "submission" of women to their husbands, and some even preach that a man has a right or a duty to beat his wife. Christianity has not dealt with harems and erections I think mainly because it is anti-sex, but I am not sure whether this is, on the whole, good or bad.

Many modern Christians, as you say, are Christians one hour a week. But this is not true of Eric Rudolph and others like him who have blown up abortion clinics, killed doctors, and even bombed the Atlanta Olympics (wtf?!) in the name of Jesus.

So, I would say that the problem with Islam in comparison with Christianity is that Islam is taken much more seriously by more people than is Christianity today. I cannot comment as well on Hinduism, Buddhism, etc., simply because I do not know them as well, but I would venture a guess that much the same is true of them. I believe that Hindu fundamentalism has played a major role in certain recent outbreaks of violence in India, for instance.

P.S. Hinduwoman, may I ask whether you are currently a Hindu, or whether you just mean you were raised in that religion?
IsItJustMe is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 11:12 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fadeaway humper
Maybe it has something to do with the cultist, supremacist mindset, which they overtly proclaim in their "sahih" (solid) hadith collections. A revealing sample from Bukhari:

Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
Narrated Jubair bin Haiya:

'Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans. When Al-Hurmuzan embraced Islam, 'Umar said to him. "I would like to consult you regarding these countries which I intend to invade." Al-Hurmuzan said, "Yes, the example of these countries and their inhabitants who are the enemies. of the Muslims, is like a bird with a head, two wings and two legs; If one of its wings got broken, it would get up over its two legs, with one wing and the head; and if the other wing got broken, it would get up with two legs and a head, but if its head got destroyed, then the two legs, two wings and the head would become useless. The head stands for Khosrau, and one wing stands for Caesar and the other wing stands for Faris. So, order the Muslims to go towards Khosrau." So, 'Umar sent us (to Khosrau) appointing An-Numan bin Muqrin as our commander. When we reached the land of the enemy, the representative of Khosrau came out with forty-thousand warriors, and an interpreter got up saying, "Let one of you talk to me!" Al-Mughira replied, "Ask whatever you wish." The other asked, "Who are you?" Al-Mughira replied, "We are some people from the Arabs; we led a hard, miserable, disastrous life: we used to suck the hides and the date stones from hunger; we used to wear clothes made up of fur of camels and hair of goats, and to worship trees and stones. While we were in this state, the Lord of the Heavens and the Earths, Elevated is His Remembrance and Majestic is His Highness, sent to us from among ourselves a Prophet whose father and mother are known to us. Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master." (Al-Mughira, then blamed An-Numan for delaying the attack and) An-Nu' man said to Al-Mughira, "If you had participated in a similar battle, in the company of Allah's Apostle he would not have blamed you for waiting, nor would he have disgraced you. But I accompanied Allah's Apostle in many battles and it was his custom that if he did not fight early by daytime, he would wait till the wind had started blowing and the time for the prayer was due (i.e. after midday)."

There you have it: Islam has to rule, because Mo said so. End of story. Also, the puzzled "Who are you?" of the Koshrauan guy is priceless. Kind of endearing, in a sad way.
I don't see any muslims saying that they disagree with you...In fact,do you see any million muslim march AGAINST Islamic fundamentalism??
Shouldn't THEY be terribly offended that those fanatics are disgracing their religion and the name of their god ?? Is it not what they do AGAINST islamic religious values? Are the good people of Islam too afraid to stand against their own fanatics?
I heard on the news today that most of the guys who blow themselves up are from Saudi Arabia...What the heck is the deal with the Saudies??
These people DON'T WANT democracy in their neck of the woods.
They don't want their status quo changed in any way.
They don't want women to have democratic freedoms.
They like the Medieval structure of rich feudal lords and poor ignorant peasants.
Thomas II is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 11:34 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsItJustMe
hinduwoman and Kosh3,

I don't disagree with anything you said, but:

Most of the attitudes or problems you identify with Islam exist as well in some strands of Christianity. There are many Christians who want to bring about a Christian conquest of the world. I am sure you have heard of Cortes and Pizarro, for instance, but there are modern Christians, such as Falwell or Robertson who are of the same view.

Christianity historically has been VERY anti-woman. The older Christian sects, such as the Catholics, the Orthodox and the Copts still do not allow women preachers. Many Christian sects preach the "submission" of women to their husbands, and some even preach that a man has a right or a duty to beat his wife. Christianity has not dealt with harems and erections I think mainly because it is anti-sex, but I am not sure whether this is, on the whole, good or bad.

Many modern Christians, as you say, are Christians one hour a week. But this is not true of Eric Rudolph and others like him who have blown up abortion clinics, killed doctors, and even bombed the Atlanta Olympics (wtf?!) in the name of Jesus.

So, I would say that the problem with Islam in comparison with Christianity is that Islam is taken much more seriously by more people than is Christianity today. I cannot comment as well on Hinduism, Buddhism, etc., simply because I do not know them as well, but I would venture a guess that much the same is true of them. I believe that Hindu fundamentalism has played a major role in certain recent outbreaks of violence in India, for instance.

P.S. Hinduwoman, may I ask whether you are currently a Hindu, or whether you just mean you were raised in that religion?
Whatever those christians do bad, these fanatic muslims do much worse...
Cut peoples heads on TV??
Blow themselves in the middle of a crowded mall??

It seems like a Yahweh from the Bible deja vu all over again...
Thomas II is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 11:44 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore.
Posts: 3,401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas II
I don't see any muslims saying that they disagree with you...In fact,do you see any million muslim march AGAINST Islamic fundamentalism??...
This is a sad fact...

http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...27#post2410827

lenrek is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 11:46 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Next smoke-filled cellar over from Preno.
Posts: 6,562
Default

Oh, Christians don't do that stuff anymore, maybe, but they sure used to. I mean, not TVs and malls, since those weren't around yet, but their 15th century equivalents, anyway. And some Christians still do stuff that is just as bad. Ever hear of a group called the Lord's Resistance Army? They are fighting to impose the Ten Commandments in Uganda, and apparently part of their strategy involves capturing young women and keeping them as sex slaves. They are as bad a bunch as any you will find.

And, anyway, I'm not at all sure that the actions you describe are worse than, say, bombing Nagasaki, shock and awe on Baghdad, funding the death squads in Colombia (very into chainsaws, those guys, and possibly cannibalism as well). All of these are done under secular banners, and all are very, very nasty. How about the Rwandan invasion of the Congo? Not particularly religious, but it has led to cannibalism, famine, disease, and the loss of some 4 million lives, and it has at least the diplomatic and probably actually the financial support of the U.S. government.

Richard Nixon was a kind of a fallen Quaker, I guess, and not really too religious, but he was a co-conspirator in the Pakistani (Muslim, it's true) genocide in Bangladesh, one of the uglier moments in 20th century history, though one of the less known.

Yes, Muslims do horrible things, as do Christians and as do atheists. But I'm not sure the horrible things done even by such a nasty regime as the Saudi government are worse than those done by many secular, enlightened first world governments. I'm sorry to say it but I think there is a strong element of jingoism and prejudice that goes into the contrary judgment.

That is, the problem you cite is a combination of three things:

Religion being taken seriously (specifically Islam but it could equally be Christianity)
War, including unconventional war
Your perception making "the other" seem worse, basically only because they are "the other"

I don't see anything to suggest that there is anything in the doctrine of Islam which particularly contributes to the problem, the more so since Islam doesn't have any single, fixed coherent doctrine, but admits to being divided into two major sects, the largest of which is in turn divided into seven major schools, and does not admit to, but in fact is, changing constantly as the world changes, and the major moral teachings of which date only to about the 13th or 14th century when the hadith were written.
IsItJustMe is offline  
Old 06-02-2005, 02:49 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tempe
Posts: 717
Default

Has anybody thought about the influence of customs too?
Lack of education in Arab countries, culture and traditions?
I see that all religions have issues and there are always flaws on religious scriptures.
But I would not categorize Islam itself as a religion indulged in fanaticism.
Or a religion that does not allow people to think.
Does anybody remember the impact of the Moors in medicine and science before the Renaissance?


For example..look at Hinduism...some dumb people hold the idea that a religion that venerates female deities would be/is nicer towards women. However, in India, many women still get the end of the stick.
This is not due religion itself, but culture.
pretheism is offline  
Old 06-02-2005, 07:39 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Switzerland.
Posts: 1,683
Default

Why would Muslims be against Islam conquering the world? They stand to benefit. They are no more opposed to the idea, then us to spread of democracy and humanistic values around the world.
RussianM3_dude is offline  
Old 06-02-2005, 08:29 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsItJustMe

So, I would say that the problem with Islam in comparison with Christianity is that Islam is taken much more seriously by more people than is Christianity today. I cannot comment as well on Hinduism, Buddhism, etc., simply because I do not know them as well, but I would venture a guess that much the same is true of them. I believe that Hindu fundamentalism has played a major role in certain recent outbreaks of violence in India, for instance.

P.S. Hinduwoman, may I ask whether you are currently a Hindu, or whether you just mean you were raised in that religion?
yes, it's called self defense...I'm not sorry if Hindus take a violent stand against the Islamic "pinky and the brain" attempts to conquer the world. Hindus and Buddhists even when they had great power, NEVER went beyond their own borders or cultures through war and conquest.

So no, you are quite incorrect in trying to equate Hinduism and Buddhism or Taoism with the likes of Christianity and Islam and their violent history and attempts to destroy indigenous cultures and peoples in their attempt to convert people. Anyone who would think that is a :Cheeky:
Dharma is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:56 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.