FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-13-2010, 11:30 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Gary Habermas says that "the disciples thought that they had seen the risen Jesus." Whatever one thinks of the truth or falsity of such a belief, it does seem highly probable that Jesus' disciples came, shortly after his death, to believe that they had seen the risen Jesus.

(This conclusion is obviously vulnerable to unconventional claims about the date and background of the NT writings, eg the claim that the Gospels are 2nd century CE works, but on standard datings etc the conclusion does seem very likely.)

Andrew Criddle
But, why did you assume that there were real actual disciples? You cannot even show that Jesus existed as described in the NT Canon.

The very Canon which claimed Jesus was the offspring of the Holy Ghost and a Virgin also claimed that the offspring of the Holy Ghost was raised from the dead but this must be fiction.

How could disciples SEE and IDENTIFY a fictitious character? How could anyone SEE and IDENTIFY what did not EXIST.

They must have SEEN a "PLASTIC BAG".

But, there were no PLASTIC BAGS then.
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:51 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.