aa5874

I have a book of fiction in front of me and there are the following words. Those words are missing from the NT.

I am not the one who wrote Matthew 1.18, Luke 1.35, John 1, Mark 9.2, Mark 16.6, Acts 1.9 or Galatians 1.1.

According to a Pauline writer Jesus did resurrect and he saw him in a resurrected state with over 500 people.

Now, how is that you want to tell me about 2000 years ago when you are from a completely different culture?

But, upon reflection, you may have the same culture of people 2000 years ago, you believe the offspring of the Holy Ghost of God was of human flesh.

But, what did Jesus, the offspring of the HOLY GHOST, do that was remarkable when virtually all the stories about him are metaphorical?

When did your Adam and Methusaleh live?

kcdad

Wow. Is that what you are looking for? Should I show you where to find them? The Bible is actually very clear as to when it is telling stories and when it is being historical. The authors obviously expected more intellect from its readers than you. When impossible things happen, like animals talking... that is story and when it talks about real life people in real life situations, that is real. So walking on water, snakes and apples, God walking around and talking with men, angels, devils... ALL of these things you can understand as stories with lessons.
There is no Holy Ghost, you intellectual homeless person. Spirit. Pneuma... a puff of air... There is no puff of air that can cause male DNA to appear from ... the air. Why do yo keep repeating the same false premises over and over and over and over and over .... ??????????????????????


He taught a liberation theology to members of a society being destroyed by Hellenistic ideas... he taught poor people to resist the empire building of Rome and other powers and principalities. he taught people that life's fulfillment was in how we interact with other people, regardless of their status or ours.

OY!:banghead:

kcdad

A REAL Jesus is unlikely to burn you in hell, too.

aa5874

But, I have already told you that Jesus was just a story, a myth and you vehemently disagree. You are claiming Jesus was really human.

Now, if the authors expected more intellect from its readers why do you not realize that the Holy Ghost of God was a story with some lessons for the Jews?

This is what I understand so far.

Someone INVENTED a story about the Son of God, the offspring of the Holy Ghost who came to warn the Jews about the wrath to come. The Jews caused the Son of God, the offspring of the Holy Ghost, to be killed innocently. The Father of Jesus, the offspring of the Holy Ghost, therefore taught the Jews a lesson and allowed the Romans to destroy the Temple.


There are lots of stories about the offspring of the Holy Ghost in the NT just like there are stories about other mythical entities in other writings of antiquity.

Now, each mythical entity has its own specific trait or characteristic. Jesus is uniquely described as the offspring of the Holy Ghost of God and a Virgin Mary.

No other mythical entity had such a baby.


I don't know where you got your information, but in the Gospels it is written that Jesus, the offspring of the Holy Ghost, taught that people should pay dues to the Romans.


Jesus taught in parables so that the Jews may remain in sin and confused.

Mt 13:34 - Jesus also taught his disciples that he would be killed and be raised on the third day.

Mr 9:31 - And Jesus, the Holy Ghost of God, even taught that people should hate their father and mother for his sake.

Lu 14:26 - And in gJohn, Jesus taught "I and my Father are one".

But what is most astonishing Jesus, the offspring of the Holy Ghost, gave fishing lessons or advice after he was raised from the dead.

John 21.5-6 The HJ is a most SENSELESS proposition. Jesus was just an invented story even with fishing lessons after the resurrection.

kcdad

You are amusing, but I tire of this nonsense.

arnoldo

But a real one would let you choose to avoid heaven.
If there was any evidence that the NT is entirely mythical then you'd have a point. All of the arguments in favor of a MJ in this thread are mainly a kind of argument of incredulity ( I can't figure it out so it's all a myth). However, as radical logic pointed out in his arguments, there can be natural explanations for extraordinary events. Thus, a Historical Jesus is a very sensible proposition.

bacht

The scientific analysis of the New Testament looks at every discrepancy and contradiction as useful data for revealing the human history of the text.

The faith perspective looks at every discrepancy and contradiction as God's way of challenging believers to harmonize everything with the core message.

The first process leads to more questions, the second process turns back to the same answers.

aa5874

That is precisely what I have predicted. You will eventually get tired and admit that the HJ makes no sense.

You cannot show that your HJ did ever exist as human.

You cannot really tell where and when he/she lived.

You cannot really say what your HJ did.

You cannot really tell what your HJ said.

You have nothing but your imagination.

Now, the NONSENSE about Jesus, the offspring of the Holy Ghost, are all documented for the world to see.

Look at a partial list.

Matthew 1.18-20 -
Luke 1:26-38 - The Virgin's baby was from the Holy Ghost.

We have an HG baby not an HJ.

The HJ is a most SENSELESS proposition since Jesus was multiple attested to be an HG with human flesh, a most mythical entity.

kcdad

No misunderstand me. I tire of your nonsense. YOU make no sense.

aa5874

That too was predictable.

You don't understand that the nonsense is actually from NT. And unlike you I don't make stuff up about Jesus

I have more non-sense from Matthew 27. 50-53.


Matthew 27:50-53 - So, not only did Jesus come back to life after the third day, but bare bones, SKELETONS of the Saints, probably dead for hundreds of years paraded the holy city.

What non-sense!

But, you believe that Jesus, the offspring of the Holy Ghost, had human flesh.

What!

The HJ is a most SENSELESS proposition since the Gospels makes no sense unless Jesus was really Supernatural.