FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-13-2008, 01:02 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
From the mythicist point of view, in the original story in Mark, Jesus descended from heaven at the age of 30 and spent a year on earth....
I'm intrigued. Which specific passages in GMark allude to him decending from heaven to begin his mission? I too see GMark as a fiction, but hadn't heard this interpretation before. (If this is a derail, feel free to just email me links.)
ChuckE99 is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 02:45 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckE99 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
From the mythicist point of view, in the original story in Mark, Jesus descended from heaven at the age of 30 and spent a year on earth....
I'm intrigued. Which specific passages in GMark allude to him decending from heaven to begin his mission? I too see GMark as a fiction, but hadn't heard this interpretation before. (If this is a derail, feel free to just email me links.)
I've forgotten who proposed this.

The theory is that Mark 1:2-13 and the first phrase in 14 were added later, and the action in Mark originally started with

Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God,


It is a bit speculative.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 02:55 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
From the mythicist point of view, in the original story in Mark, Jesus descended from heaven at the age of 30 and spent a year on earth. Later, when he was historicized into an actual person, a story of his miraculous birth was added by Matt; Luke riffed on that, changed a few details, and added the scene at the Temple at age 12. It was only later that imaginative Christians added some childhood scenes, but by then, it was much too late to pretend that these tales came from the original disciples.

"Jesus descended from heaven at the age of 30"? There is something wrong, here.

You mean Jesus descended from heaven in the 15th year in the reign of Tiberius as stated in the reconstructed gospel of Marcion?
aa5874 is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 03:02 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
From the mythicist point of view, in the original story in Mark, Jesus descended from heaven at the age of 30 and spent a year on earth. Later, when he was historicized into an actual person, a story of his miraculous birth was added by Matt; Luke riffed on that, changed a few details, and added the scene at the Temple at age 12.
Josephus has a story of himself at the age of 14 where all the high priests and principal men of Jerusalem came to him for advice.

Luke seems to draw heavily upon Josephus.

Perhaps he thought it was a good story, and so used it for his Jesus.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 03:04 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

By 30, I meant that Jesus was 30 years old.

The reconstructed gospel of Marcion

Quote:
3:1/4:31 In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar,
Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea,
Jesus descended [out of heaven] into Capernaum, a city in Galilee,
and was teaching [in the synagogue] on the Sabbath days;
And they were astonished at his doctrine,
The assumption is that this is based on Luke, but Luke presumably was based on Mark.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 03:06 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
...
Josephus has a story of himself at the age of 14 where all the high priests and principal men of Jerusalem came to him for advice.

Luke seems to draw heavily upon Josephus.

Perhaps he thought it was a good story, and so used it for his Jesus.
That's a possibility, but it was also a common boast about famous men, so Luke had more than one possible source. I think we went through this before, somewhere.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 03:43 PM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

It's not very common to learn about someone's childhood. But that absence becomes significant when we learn about someone's infancy, as we do with Jesus Christ.

Lord Raglan noted that such a childhood gap is a common part of hero stories, and thus wrote it into his Mythic-Hero profile.

There is an exception that shows up here and there: child-prodigy stories, like Jesus Christ in the Temple or Augustus Caesar hushing up some noisy frogs.

But we don't see anything that's a relatively "normal" sort of event. To see what I mean, consider that one of the first to document someone's childhood is St. Augustine, who wrote about his own in his autobiography Confessions. He moaned and groaned at great length in it about an extremely terrible sin that he had committed in his childhood: he and some other boys stole some pears from a neighbor's pear tree.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 05:04 PM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
By 30, I meant that Jesus was 30 years old.

The reconstructed gospel of Marcion

Quote:
3:1/4:31 In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar,
Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea,
Jesus descended [out of heaven] into Capernaum, a city in Galilee,
and was teaching [in the synagogue] on the Sabbath days;
And they were astonished at his doctrine,
The assumption is that this is based on Luke, but Luke presumably was based on Mark.
There is no age mentioned for the Jesus that descended out of heaven. He was supposed to be a phantom, he had no human parents at all, nor was he born on earth, therefore no birthday or known age.

The Jesus in gLuke, the one that went to Capernaum in the 15th year of Tiberius was supposed to be about thirty years of age. This Jesus was supposed to be born on earth and Mary was his so-called mother.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 08:19 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default

Hi Roger,

It seems to me to be a theologically based judgment that the gnostic gospels postdate the canonical gospels. I have never found a coherent argument or any historical evidence for this postulate.

Also, as I recall, the members of the Jesus Seminar were strongly suggesting that the Gospel of Thomas might predate the canonical gospels.

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay


Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaming Moe View Post
I was hoping someone might be able to shed some light on why the writers of the Gospels chose to leave such a gap in the life of Jesus and not include incidents from the Gnostic Gospels that dealt with his years from 12 onwards.
The gnostic gospels were not written until after the canonical gospels were complete, and indeed mostly well after. Their content reflects the Greek philosophical preoccupations of their composers, rather than anything to do with a Jewish rabbi of the preceding century.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 11:13 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Hi Philosopher Jay,

There is also the argument as to the testimony of the C14 dating citations regarding the earliest evidence in respect of christian texts, and the only two dates that I know of are for non canonical texts. I dont know if there are any C14 dates for canonical literature, but if the 3 or 4 main old NT greek codices were C14 tested, they might match the current estimate of the late fourth century.

So on the face of the evidence alone, and rejecting this paleographic romance story of reading papyri and divining by handwriting the date of the text, we are left with the non canonical texts before the canon.

Best wishes,


Pete



Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
Hi Roger,

It seems to me to be a theologically based judgment that the gnostic gospels postdate the canonical gospels. I have never found a coherent argument or any historical evidence for this postulate.

Also, as I recall, the members of the Jesus Seminar were strongly suggesting that the Gospel of Thomas might predate the canonical gospels.

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay


Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post

The gnostic gospels were not written until after the canonical gospels were complete, and indeed mostly well after. Their content reflects the Greek philosophical preoccupations of their composers, rather than anything to do with a Jewish rabbi of the preceding century.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.