Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-13-2012, 06:47 AM | #91 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
You are on a massive smear campaign against those who argue that Jesus was described as a Myth in the very Bible. You are on a massive smear campaign against those who show that in the very Bible Jesus claimed the Jews were of the Devil. It is clear that in the very Gospels in the Canon that a Jesus character, the Son of a Ghost, was used by the authors to display hatred of the Jews. Incredibly, the Jesus character in gJohn claimed the Jews were children of the Devil. John 8:44 KJV Quote:
It is clear that the Jesus character, the Son of a Ghost, was used in the Gospel to propagate a Pack of lies against the Jews. In Antiquities of the Jews 18 it is claimed that the Jews would rather die, have their necks chopped, than to have effigies of Tiberius placed in the Temple. In "On the Embassy to Gaius" it is claimed that of all the nations on earth ONLY the Jews did NOT worship the Roman Emperor Gaius as a God. The Jesus character, the Son of a Ghost, in the NT did NOT ever say a single word against the Evil Roman Empire who enslaved and massacred the Jews and other nations. |
||
10-14-2012, 02:47 PM | #92 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
I can't say that I see anything in your quotations that touch upon mythical beings, or even redeemers. Seems to me you're just putting the usual heathenish spin on rather straight-forward Jewish texts. By the way, why not put the citations along with your quotations? Is it so you can prove yourself more Jewy than the next guy?
|
10-14-2012, 02:48 PM | #93 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
|
10-14-2012, 02:49 PM | #94 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
Dear old aa5874. Don't stop being you!
|
10-14-2012, 05:30 PM | #95 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
Plato was considered to be Greek - hence 'platonic'. Sure, jews like everyone else, were smart enough to absorb ideas from others. Why do you persist in thinking they were incapable of this? Do you imagine they were especially stupid or backward? |
|
10-14-2012, 05:35 PM | #96 | |||
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
But be careful about citations - it might tip your hand how more or less 'Jewy' you are... |
|||
10-14-2012, 06:42 PM | #97 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Care to explain to everyone here exactly what it was that I wrote above in Hebrew that you find to be 'anti Semetic', (that was the question after all) and explain to everyone exactly what it was that you found in the above statements, to be a 'heathenish spin' ? Quote:
. |
||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|