FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2011, 02:40 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default To Whom Was Galatians Written?

Romans was written to Rome (albeit before there were established communities of believers), Ephesians was written to Ephesus, Corinthians to those in Corinth.

Yet, what was the mystery to call Galatians by that name, since Galatia was a whole region even if it was the backwoods? It's like writing Epistle to the Bostonians, Epistle to the Angelinos, and then one epistles to the Texans......Maybe it was meant to be Epistle to the Pontusians or Iconians.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 02:52 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Romans was written to Rome (albeit before there were established communities of believers), Ephesians was written to Ephesus, Corinthians to those in Corinth.

Yet, what was the mystery to call Galatians by that name, since Galatia was a whole region even if it was the backwoods? It's like writing Epistle to the Bostonians, Epistle to the Angelinos, and then one epistles to the Texans......Maybe it was meant to be Epistle to the Pontusians or Iconians.
Again, you are wrong or confused.

The writer of the Epistle CLAIMED the faith of the Romans was known throuhout the world.

"Romans 1.8
Quote:
First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for all of you, because the Whole World is hearing of your faith...
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 03:05 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Romans was written to Rome (albeit before there were established communities of believers)
Many believers in Rome were named, and known personally to the apostle. More than in any other NT letter, I think.

Quote:
Ephesians was written to Ephesus
It was written to the church in Ephesus.

Quote:
Yet, what was the mystery to call Galatians by that name, since Galatia was a whole region
It was written 'to the churches in Galatia'. Whatever the character of the inhabitants of the region (which was compact as well as well-defined), they were surely capable of talking to each other, and of making copies of the short letter written to them, which evidently had an impact. As well it might!
sotto voce is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 03:38 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

There's no plausible explanation here. "Ephesians” is not identified as such in many old witnesses. It is best identified as the anonymous epistle (Ephesus is closely associated with Polycarp). I think some old source identifies Galatians as having been written at Ephesus
stephan huller is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 03:43 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
"Ephesians” is not identified as such in many old witnesses.
'Paul.. to the saints in Ephesus'

Quote:
Ephesus is closely associated with Polycarp
Not by those who value the letter to the Ephesian church.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 03:45 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Romans was written to Rome (albeit before there were established communities of believers), Ephesians was written to Ephesus, Corinthians to those in Corinth.

Yet, what was the mystery to call Galatians by that name, since Galatia was a whole region even if it was the backwoods? It's like writing Epistle to the Bostonians, Epistle to the Angelinos, and then one epistles to the Texans......Maybe it was meant to be Epistle to the Pontusians or Iconians.
Pro'ly just the Hellenized coastal cities, and not the spelt eating celts in the interior. So yes, Pontusians & Iconians.

DCH
DCHindley is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 03:52 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

NO I am not confused. I agree with you that it was a wildly exaggerated expression and a dead giveaway that it wasn't written by the alleged writer of the 1st century. But Galatians is the most interesting epistle, it's very provocative, exclusivist, arrogant. In any case, like I argue in the other thread, I think Paulus must refer to a generic writer applicable to the "authentic" and "non-authentic" epistles written by "The Small One".

Anyway, I await your latest additions to my other thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Romans was written to Rome (albeit before there were established communities of believers), Ephesians was written to Ephesus, Corinthians to those in Corinth.

Yet, what was the mystery to call Galatians by that name, since Galatia was a whole region even if it was the backwoods? It's like writing Epistle to the Bostonians, Epistle to the Angelinos, and then one epistles to the Texans......Maybe it was meant to be Epistle to the Pontusians or Iconians.
Again, you are wrong or confused.

The writer of the Epistle CLAIMED the faith of the Romans was known throuhout the world.

"Romans 1.8
Quote:
First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for all of you, because the Whole World is hearing of your faith...
Duvduv is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 03:53 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

By the same token other epistles could have been addressed to the Macedonians, to the Italians (!) and to the Turks (!).

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Romans was written to Rome (albeit before there were established communities of believers), Ephesians was written to Ephesus, Corinthians to those in Corinth.

Yet, what was the mystery to call Galatians by that name, since Galatia was a whole region even if it was the backwoods? It's like writing Epistle to the Bostonians, Epistle to the Angelinos, and then one epistles to the Texans......Maybe it was meant to be Epistle to the Pontusians or Iconians.
Pro'ly just the Hellenized coastal cities, and not the spelt eating celts in the interior. So yes, Pontusians & Iconians.

DCH
Duvduv is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 04:21 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

It wouldn't be the Galileans would it? or 'saved sinners' by another name for whom Paul's 'race-to-end' movement does seem real.

Notice please that if 'cold is good' and 'hot is good' and if 'good is good' neither cold not hot will be in Galilee, but since lukewarm is neither cold nor hot Galilee must have been the place for them and actually do fit both Paul's urgence and description very well.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 04:43 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Galatians is the most interesting epistle, it's very provocative, exclusivist, arrogant.
It's the most inconvenient for legalists today, as it was for contemporaries like diaspora Pharisees. The Galatians were unusual among even the Hellenist congregations in that they had quickly returned to pagan habits, which may be attributed to the fickleness for which Gauls were well known. But their extraordinarily wayward and indeed shameful behaviour, which may have made Paul and his friends blink in amazement, was, through imperial diktat, to become orthodoxy. Those of totalitarian instincts today therefore find Paul's entirely rational and measured response particularly difficult. There is a natural tendency to place reproach on Paul rather than the heretical tendencies of those to whom he wrote.
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.