Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-06-2011, 02:19 AM | #31 |
Talk Freethought Staff
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Marseille, France
Posts: 1,669
|
Of course, not a deviant in the christian sense - after all, christianity has codified what is "normal" sexuality according to Paul teachings.
But in my experience, people with so many hangs-up about purity and sexuality and earthy pleasures, especially when they preach everybody to apply them, aren't the sanest ones around. Whatever his "thorn in his flesh" was, I wouldn't let someone who wrote what Paul wrote alone with my daughter. |
07-06-2011, 10:19 AM | #32 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Here goes the "rumor mill". A classical example of "Chinese Whispers". It is most remarkable that people here are almost certain of what they speculate and call them "best explanations" without a single shred of credible evidence from the same Pauline writer.
Why is it so difficult to actually read and accept what is found in the Pauline writings itself? 'Paul" has made himself a False witness because he testified that God raised Jesus from the dead when the dead rise NOT. 1Cor 15:15 - Quote:
1Cor 11:23 - Quote:
We don't need "Paul" once Jesus did resurrect. Why did Jesus VANISH after he resurrected? Why resurrect and then Vanish? "Paul" was a false witness for the Glory of God because the dead rise NOT on the third day. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|