FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-20-2004, 03:12 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On the fringes of the Lake District, UK
Posts: 9,528
Default

I watched a documentary about the snake handlers of wherever they were from and yes, several did get bitten and at least one died, the silly chump. Doesn't it say something in the bible about not putting God to the test anyway??

Obviously, these churches are rare, but I would submit that the belief that mental illness is really possession is more common. I have a friend from a Pentecostal church who quite plainly believes that (which makes it a bit awkward, as a medicated depressive, for me to be around her), and I have encountered many other Christians would take the slightly less extreme but still IMO damaging line that people with mental illness just need to pray a bit harder and God will heal them. Not all Christians think this, of course, but in my experience enough do.
IamMoose is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:14 AM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Off to GRD
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:17 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On the fringes of the Lake District, UK
Posts: 9,528
Default

BTW, in response to someone up there (sorry am too lazy to find the exact quote, tsk tsk), I know a Christian who does not believe that any Christians should use non believing psychiatrists, general practitioners etc, because 'they will start from the presumption that your religion is a mental illness and try to eradicate it.'

I have sometimes wondered whether religion was simply collective mental illness but then decided it would be patronising of me to advance that theory to the Christians that I know.. one could certainly understand them not being very thrilled at the idea . But I feel that in some senses religion is 'catching;' ie if you spend long enough round people with a certain set of beliefs, no matter how outlandish those beliefs are, you will eventually come either to accept them wholly, or at the least to see them as less 'far out' than you used to do. Ultimately, noone ever spontaneously became religious - except perhaps Saul - so there has to be an element of contagiousness about it.

Sorry, I am waffling aren't I?
IamMoose is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 04:46 AM   #34
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

We must be very careful about assuming a scientific basis to psychiatry.

We really are still very ignorant of how this extremely complex organ, the brain, constructs these concepts 'mind" and "consciousness" and how masses of brains socially construct societies, beliefs and all.

We have defined some forms of hallucination and "interesting" behaviours as "mental ilnesses" but you will find the definitions are very related to "treatments" available.

Some items have not been defined as "mad" for basically political reasons, although other psychiatries - Soviet is an example - did attempt this with religion.

Courts spend a huge amount of time differentiating "mad" and "bad". Depending on a decision, an individual may follow two different career paths - "asylums" or prisons.

We do know we are very frightened of madness, and many societies have used all sorts of ways to cope with it, witch doctors, exorcism, electro shock therapy. lobotomies and drugs come to "mind". There's gold in them thar hills as well, ritalin for children makes loadsamoney!

I read that Byzantines treated the mad by putting them in very beautiful buildings overlooking the sea, with food, rest and calming influences.

Sounds a little bit more humane than "modecate pushers" or praying for God to heal you!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 02:23 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 983
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
Paul is not here to defend himself, but you can find different views of women in the letters that are attributed to him. It seems unlikely that he was any more misogynist than the culture he lived in.

In his letters and in the book of Acts, Paul appears to work with women in an egalitarian relationship, and there is one passage in his letters that says, in Christ there is no East or West, no male or female (quoting from memory, so this is not exact).

On the other hand, there are passages in Paul's epistles that call for women to be silent in church and obey their husbands (and for slaves to obey their masters.)

Did the same person write both of these passages? There is enough contradictory material about Paul to make him a hero or a villain in your narrative of early Christianity. He might be a repressed homosexual. He might be the victim of later forgers.

And what does this have to do with mental illness?
Medical researchers are on the hunt for the repressed homosexual gene to add to the DMZ.
Angyson is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 02:31 PM   #36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 983
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamMoose
BTW, in response to someone up there (sorry am too lazy to find the exact quote, tsk tsk), I know a Christian who does not believe that any Christians should use non believing psychiatrists, general practitioners etc, because 'they will start from the presumption that your religion is a mental illness and try to eradicate it.'

I have sometimes wondered whether religion was simply collective mental illness but then decided it would be patronising of me to advance that theory to the Christians that I know.. one could certainly understand them not being very thrilled at the idea . But I feel that in some senses religion is 'catching;' ie if you spend long enough round people with a certain set of beliefs, no matter how outlandish those beliefs are, you will eventually come either to accept them wholly, or at the least to see them as less 'far out' than you used to do. Ultimately, noone ever spontaneously became religious - except perhaps Saul - so there has to be an element of contagiousness about it.

Sorry, I am waffling aren't I?
I became a Christian in the wilderness reading the bible cover to cover.
Angyson is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 03:10 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 2,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angyson
Medical researchers are on the hunt for the repressed homosexual gene to add to the DMZ.
I assume you mean DSM?
Cynthia of Syracuse is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 03:18 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
In John's clarity of vision it is impossible to hallucinate because he had noetic vision wherein the supernatural does not exist. To suggest that John was hallucinating is like suggesting that there exists a supernatural beyond the supernatural and that is not possible. Only humans with hyletic vision can have ecstatic moments of endearment or resentment with the supernatural and these we call hallucinations.
DougP is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 04:09 PM   #39
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NW D.C.
Posts: 2,941
Default 141:37 Jungians

The primary Operative Archetype or subconscious personality is usually female in the physical male, and vice versa, and become flipped for some, so close are they entertwined and enfolded. Most of the split personality business is a natural part of the subconscious superplex of any individual, such as badgering parents or teachers.
Under stress, this subconscious complex can surface and manifest itself as the original schizophrenic definition. Oddly enough, one can actually choose which personalities, from any story or personal experience, are prime in the dynamic hierarchy- anything from Gandolf to Mhoram to Prince Tigana to Jfk to penelope to Leonardo Devinci to Horton to Kath to living people you admire- all playing a game of boids- automatically, optimally changing places in a way that will make your life a great book!
Last Week I felt my Odysseus' drop down into my subconscious, and feel a great friendship+ for the living now, and have this tremendous need now to re-establish childhood friendships and lost loves. And one thing I've noticed is that my personal drama has left me much too nice for my own good.
Although changes are taking place in my nearby environment, I've begun to feel claustrophobic even outside in my 33 year old D.C. Metro environment.It's time for a change!
&namaste all
P.S. I know I've just had something pulled down by subconscious that I wanted to say, but- that's all for the better- off topic for this thread.
Otik the Jungian AKA(?) neil
OdysseusTheInnkeeper is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 07:29 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On the fringes of the Lake District, UK
Posts: 9,528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angyson
I became a Christian in the wilderness reading the bible cover to cover.
Then you were being influenced by other Christians, even if they weren't there in person . You think you'd have converted if you HADN'T had a bible with you?

Okay that's maybe a bit of an unfair question .. I suppose there's nothing wrong with converting after reading the bible. What specifically made you convert?
IamMoose is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.