FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2008, 06:58 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,061
Default The first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD

Quote:
Originally Posted by barre
Quote:
Ever since human beings have become aware that they are dependent upon higher forces, they have socially constructed a divine world through which they hoped to manage their situation. This effort often involved securing the blessings of their deity or deities or placating them to avert divine wrath. Christianity belongs to this primitive mode of thinking in that it advocates the view that a now cosmic sacrifice was necessary to secure divine favor and avert divine wrath.
Barré
Hi

I don't agree with you.

In my opinion, the first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD; when they lost the guidance or their concepts got corrupted or they became superstitious they became believers in many gods or perhaps no god. This is what I understand from Quran the pristine Word of GodAllahYHWH.

Others could differ with me out of their free will, but I don't think they have got any solid proof; only conjectures.

Whatever you believe, I respect your faith or no-faith.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
paarsurrey is offline  
Old 03-10-2008, 08:11 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by barre
Quote:
Ever since human beings have become aware that they are dependent upon higher forces, they have socially constructed a divine world through which they hoped to manage their situation. This effort often involved securing the blessings of their deity or deities or placating them to avert divine wrath. Christianity belongs to this primitive mode of thinking in that it advocates the view that a now cosmic sacrifice was necessary to secure divine favor and avert divine wrath.
Barré
Hi

I don't agree with you.

In my opinion, the first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD; when they lost the guidance or their concepts got corrupted or they became superstitious they became believers in many gods or perhaps no god. This is what I understand from Quran the pristine Word of GodAllahYHWH.

Others could differ with me out of their free will, but I don't think they have got any solid proof; only conjectures.

Whatever you believe, I respect your faith or no-faith.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Who were these first believers, where did they live and when did they write down the name of the ONEGOD for the first time?

No conjectures, please. Just give me solid proof.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 03-10-2008, 10:34 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane in the land of Oz
Posts: 1,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by barre
Quote:
Ever since human beings have become aware that they are dependent upon higher forces, they have socially constructed a divine world through which they hoped to manage their situation. This effort often involved securing the blessings of their deity or deities or placating them to avert divine wrath. Christianity belongs to this primitive mode of thinking in that it advocates the view that a now cosmic sacrifice was necessary to secure divine favor and avert divine wrath.
Barré
Hi

I don't agree with you.

In my opinion, the first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD; when they lost the guidance or their concepts got corrupted or they became superstitious they became believers in many gods or perhaps no god. This is what I understand from Quran the pristine Word of GodAllahYHWH.

Others could differ with me out of their free will, but I don't think they have got any solid proof; only conjectures.

Whatever you believe, I respect your faith or no-faith.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
It doesnt matter what we believe. What matters, is what does the evidence tell us?

What makes you think the Quran is a reliable guide to history?
Sapho is offline  
Old 03-10-2008, 10:36 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey
The first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD
All archelogical evidence appears to indicate otherwise, unless you are claiming that all of those hundreds of pre-Israelite ancient "gods" were really all just a lot of different names for what was really only one (and the same) "god".
But such a theory would not seem to sit at all well with those warnings against serving the old "false" gods to be found within The Scriptures, "those "gods" from the other side of the flood"
Joshua 24:2, 14, 15. and in The Qur'an, 007.138, 016.036
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 03-10-2008, 11:23 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,615
Default

Semitic monotheism is simply a rip-off of Zoroastrian dualism, which itself at its early stages was the Persian form of Hinduism, as both Zoroastrianism and Hinduism stemmed from the same source and are both offshoots of proto-Indo-Iranian religion.
adren@line is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:19 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by [B]

Hi

I don't agree with you.

In my opinion, the first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD; when they lost the guidance or their concepts got corrupted or they became superstitious they became believers in many gods or perhaps no god. This is what I understand from Quran the pristine Word of GodAllahYHWH.

Others could differ with me out of their free will, but I don't think they have got any solid proof; only conjectures.

Whatever you believe, I respect your faith or no-faith.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim


Where do you get the notion that Allah and Yahweh are the same God?
Osbert is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:24 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adren@line View Post
Semitic monotheism is simply a rip-off of Zoroastrian dualism, which itself at its early stages was the Persian form of Hinduism, as both Zoroastrianism and Hinduism stemmed from the same source and are both offshoots of proto-Indo-Iranian religion.
Evidence?
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 03:12 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey View Post
Hi

I don't agree with you.

In my opinion, the first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD
I hope you have more than an opinion behind the assertion that at the start there was monotheism. Monotheism is a relatively late development, as noted it is heavily derivative of Persian origins. The god Ēl is the more older and original theism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey View Post
; when they lost the guidance or their concepts got corrupted or they became superstitious they became believers in many gods or perhaps no god. This is what I understand from Quran the pristine Word of GodAllahYHWH.

Others could differ with me out of their free will, but I don't think they have got any solid proof; only conjectures.

Whatever you believe, I respect your faith or no-faith.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
That people got lost or their concepts corrupted are normative judgements. That is, there is an implied inferiority to those who got 'lost' or 'corrupted' from this alleged origin of monotheism. Anyway this is rather peripheral. The main matter here is whether there were originally believers in monotheism. I just don't see this case in history. There were first polytheisms and henotheisms and possibly at the origin of belief there was animism. Monotheism is such a refined and generally institutional spirituality which developed relatively late in history.
A Stable Flux is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 04:57 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey View Post
the first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD;
You say so. Any other reason we should believe it?
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 05:21 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by barre


Hi

I don't agree with you.

In my opinion, the first to start with, there were believers in ONEGOD; when they lost the guidance or their concepts got corrupted or they became superstitious they became believers in many gods or perhaps no god. This is what I understand from Quran the pristine Word of GodAllahYHWH.

Others could differ with me out of their free will, but I don't think they have got any solid proof; only conjectures.

Whatever you believe, I respect your faith or no-faith.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Who were these first believers, where did they live and when did they write down the name of the ONEGOD for the first time?

No conjectures, please. Just give me solid proof.
Hi

I think first there was verbal Revelation from GodAllahYHWH; and when man first learnt language from GodAllahYHWH, then came the stage that human knowldge should be stored and committed to writing.

Quran the prinstine and most secure of the RevealedBooks mentions it.

The Holy Quran : Chapter 55: Al-Rahman

[55:1] In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
[55:2] The Gracious God.
[55:3] He taught the Qur'an.
[55:4] He created man,
[55:5] And taught him plain speech
.
http://www3.alislam.org/showChapter.jsp?ch=55

The Holy Quran : Chapter 96: Al-`Alaq

[96:1] In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
[96:2] Proclaim thou in the name of thy Lord Who created,
[96:3] Created man from a clot of blood.
[96:4] Proclaim! and thy Lord is the Most Bounteous;
[96:5] Who taught by the pen,
[96:6] Taught man what he knew not.
[96:7] Nay! man, indeed, transgresses,
[96:8] Because he thinks himself to be independent.
http://www3.alislam.org/showChapter.jsp?ch=96

So, GodAllahYHWH tells us that first He taught man plain speech and letter man learnt to write with pen, perhaps under His guidance. This seems to be reasonable and logical , of all the possible probabalities. With a little thinking one could get it.

I respect you viewpoint.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
paarsurrey is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:56 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.