FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2005, 07:46 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Default

Jesus was killed on a roman execution device for sedition, Pontius Pilate even sardonically placed "the king of the jews" in 3 languages to make sure EVERYBODY knew what he was being executed for. What do you think Caiaphas was? a jewish representative or a roman puppet?

Justin Martyr mentions the Acts of Pontius Pilate, so one would assume that they really existed prior to the 5th century forgery, and it would be quite odd to tell an Emperor he can look at them himself if he can't when pleading for his life, so it seemed Pontius Pilate did mention Jesus' execution for sedition.
adzzy is offline  
Old 10-23-2005, 08:14 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
I have doubts whether 'his blood be upon us and on our children' is intended to imply an eternal responsibility upon the Jewish people.

In Biblical thought the responsibility before God of people for their ancestors' crime is usually for a limited number of generations. See for example Exodus 34:7 'visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children's children to the third and the fourth generation.'

Matthew is probably primarily thinking of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE a generation or so after the death of Jesus.

Andrew Criddle
IMVHO, the destruction of the temple is one of the many aspects of the "eternal punishment" of the Jews, although primarily I had in mind the snatching away of the promise of Jesus from the Jews only to all the Gentiles instead, which is irrevertable.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:44 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
I wonder why Christians do not find it strange that the Christian God has chosen to preserve a people who for the most part have historically rejected his Son.
What does that mean the Jewish rejected Jesus? Is there a certain number needed before one can say the Jews accepted Jesus? If 10% of all Jews in all of history said they believed in Jesus and 90% didn't does that mean many rejected or many accepted? How do we define failure or success in terms of Jesus reaching the Jews?

Rodney Stark in his bok Rise of Christianity says, "Everyone knows that the Jews rejected the Christian message. But how do we know this?" (pg. 50).

"There is recent physical evidence suggesting that the Christian and Jewish communities remained closely linked-intertwined even-until far later than is consistent with claims about the early and absolute break between church and synagogue" (pg.68).

It is fun to say that the Jews rejected Jesus. It makes the whole Christian gospel ironic. But how do we define it? In the end it merely comes down to a matter of perspective on history. Glass half-empty, half-full controversy.
achristianbeliever is offline  
Old 10-24-2005, 10:32 AM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Lee Merrill's 'There will always be a Jewish people'

Quote:
Originally Posted by achristianbeliever
What does that mean the Jewish rejected Jesus? Is there a certain number needed before one can say the Jews accepted Jesus? If 10% of all Jews in all of history said they believed in Jesus and 90% didn't does that mean many rejected or many accepted? How do we define failure or success in terms of Jesus reaching the Jews?

Rodney Stark in his bok Rise of Christianity says, "Everyone knows that the Jews rejected the Christian message. But how do we know this?" (pg. 50).

"There is recent physical evidence suggesting that the Christian and Jewish communities remained closely linked-intertwined even-until far later than is consistent with claims about the early and absolute break between church and synagogue" (pg.68).
But what about today?

Quote:
Originally Posted by achristianbeliever
It is fun to say that the Jews rejected Jesus. It makes the whole Christian gospel ironic. But how do we define it? In the end it merely comes down to a matter of perspective on history. Glass half-empty, half-full controversy.
The point is, what indicates that God made a land promise to Abraham and that God is responsible for the survival of the Jewish people?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 10-24-2005, 10:35 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
But what about today?

Here ya go.
freigeister is offline  
Old 10-24-2005, 01:10 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle I believe that the continued existence of the Jewish people is a demonstration of God's faithfulness, whether or not it is a clear fulfillment of specific scriptures.
Why is that?
The Bible claims that God chose and elected Israel. The preservation of the Jewish people is a fulfilment of that divine purpose. And shows the consistency of God.

(I'm not replying to the other points. Some are off-topic in this thread some are off-topic in this forum.)

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 10-24-2005, 11:44 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Lee Merrill's "There will always be a Jewish people"

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
The Bible claims that God chose and elected Israel.
Yes, but there is no evidence that such was the case.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewCriddle
The preservation of the Jewish people is a fulfilment of that divine purpose. And shows the consistency of God.
It does not show any such thing. If you had 10 million children, and you were trying to protect them, would you allow millions of them to be killed? Of course you wouldn't. Titus invaded Palestine in 70 A.D., killed many thousands of Jews and destroyed the Temple. In the early part of the 2nd century, Trajan went to Palestine to deal with a Jewish uprising and killed voer 500,000 Jews. Hitler killed over 6 million Jews. Today, Israel is a police state, the vast majority of Jews who live there are not Christians, and a sizeable percentage of them resent being proselytized by Christians. If anything, the history of the Jewish people indicates that God failed to protect them in a manner that is consistent with what most people consider to be protection from a supreme being.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.