FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2006, 09:59 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest America.
Posts: 11,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life
We need to throw out hsitory books too because you can't read about stuff in a history book and assume that stuff happened just because you read it in a history book.
Apples and Oranges. History books are confirmed by other sources of information and they are often testable. The bible is a group of stories that are not confirmed by any other civilizations living at the time. The bible contains many stories that would have affected the whole world (God stopping the sun so that Joshua could continue slaughtering the heathens and the "flood" for example) but these events are not noted by civilizations living during this time.
Harry Bosch is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 10:21 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by punk77
You were right Sven:notworthy:.
Thanks for the congrats, but there are times when I rather like to be proven wrong.
Sven is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 10:53 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,620
Default

Since the texts allegedly about Jesus were not written down for a couple of generations after, one can hypothesise that accounts were exagerated and/or deliberately fabricated to get people to believe.

We can also notice that these days there are accounts of miracle healings in many religions and none - people like Sylvia Browne and John Edrards, Uri Geller, the so called Psychic Surgeons in the Philippines and Latin America, Sai Baba - the list goes on - all have their following of true believers despite them being clearly debunked, many caught doing sleight of hand on video.

Perhaps Jesus existed, and managed to persuade some people that he did some miracles. But there is really nothing unique in that.

However, no claim of the supernatural has ever been substantiated.

For further information on the variety of supernatural claims, and the evidence that they are in fact genuine, I'd strongly suggest searching for The Skeptics Dictionary and the JREF.

Nice to see you back here - I was wondering if you'd given up.

BTW - I think I'm right in thinking that there are major supernatural claims concerning the late and unlamented L Ron Hubbard.

Half-life- unsubstantiated supernatural claims are not good reasons for believing in something.

David B
David B is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 11:03 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Goodrich, Mi
Posts: 538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life
Let us say Jesus never performed any miracles. Does it seem logical to you that people would believe him as the Messiah and follow him?

Cmon atheists, you know darn well if someone was claiming to be the Messiah in the first century, and was "healing the sick" and the sick didn't get healed, everyone would laugh at him and not believe him!

This did not happen atheists. People flocked to him and followed him so logic dictates he must have performed the miracles.

Would you not laugh at soemone today who couldn't do a miracle?

If they did do the miracle, would you not tell others about his wondrous powers?

How did Jesus gain so many followers by faking his raising people from the dead?
Half life, *sigh*.... I'm sure you know about how much of the scripture regarding Jesus was written in the forth century, Christianity is nothing more than a myth written by some creative writters, and becouse of some very violent wars, assassinations, and genocide, it was able to take power, there never were any miricals becouse he didn't exist, and there are no miricles today, becouse people understand how the world works.
scisyhp is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 11:05 AM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scisyhp
Half life, *sigh*.... I'm sure you know about how much of the scripture regarding Jesus was written in the forth century
In the fourth century?!

This would be news to me!

P.S.: I suggest a spell checker.
Sven is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 11:09 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Goodrich, Mi
Posts: 538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven
In the fourth century?!

This would be news to me!

P.S.: I suggest a spell checker.
That's what I've read.
scisyhp is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 11:20 AM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Many of the surviving manuscripts may date to the fourth century. But scholars deduce that the gospels were written in the late first or early second centuries. Exactly when, and how accurately they were transmitted, is a hot topic.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 11:20 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: GR, MI USA
Posts: 4,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life
We need to throw out hsitory books too because you can't read about stuff in a history book and assume that stuff happened just because you read it in a history book.


In regards to the OP, you've got to be out of fallacies by now HL.
ELECTROGOD is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 11:58 AM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life
We need to throw out hsitory books too because you can't read about stuff in a history book and assume that stuff happened just because you read it in a history book.
Perhaps you don't realize this is partially true. There are lots of things in history books that are just bullshit. The example I always give people is Josephus. In War of the Jews 6.5.3 he writes about a heifer giving birth to a lamb. This is complete bullshit, written in one of our only primary sources for the era.

Not only is Josephus practically our only source of history from this period, but he was directly involved with most of the things he wrote about. Yet his history is extremely tainted. So much of what he writes elevates himself or the Flavians. His history is written with a purpose, and that purpose isn't the pure pursuit of truth.

Anyone who believes everything they read in any history book, ancient or modern, is an idiot. There really is no shortcut here, other than to become just as familiar with the primary sources as historians themselves are.

Of course, the Gospels are in whole different category of bullshit altogether.
Revisionist is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 12:02 PM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: US
Posts: 107
Default

...In the crusade of the Shepherds, for example, a renegade monk named Jacob claimed the he had received a letter from the Virgin Mary summoning all shepherds to free the Holy Sepulcher. Tens of thousands of poor people followed Jacob about, armed with pitchforks, hatchets, ad daggers which they would hold aloft as they entered a town, initmidating the authorities so that they would be given a proper reception. Jacob had visions, healed the sick, gave miraculous banquets in which food appeared faster than it could be eaten, denounced the clergy, and killed any one who dared to interrupt his sermons. ..."

- Cows pigs wars and witches . page 197

Mass hysteria.. plain and simple.
ChandraRama is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:38 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.