FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2007, 03:56 AM   #271
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Hey, I've just realized something...

If Dave is sufficiently nuts to imagine that 1 Enoch is the actual words of Enoch, describing events that actually happened...

...Then Dave Hawkins is a Flat-Earther.

The Hebrew flat-Earth cosmology is VERY specific in 1 Enoch, far more so than in what is now the canonical OT. The flat Earth is covered by a solid Firmament, with a complex system of "gates" to let the Sun and Moon in and out of the dome. Enoch saw all this on a personal "guided tour" given by God himself.

Jude 1:14 at ErrancyWiki
You obviously have studied nothing about the history of the zodiac and ancient cosmological language. But I'm not going to enlighten you on this thread. Suffice to say that deciding a book is not canonical only means that it is not deemed to be an authoritative message from God, not that it contains errors, or that it is not actually a work of the stated author, etc.
Quote:
To pick another example, the works of Josephus are not canonical, but they are accurate as far as we know and are truly the work of Josephus.
Except the part where Jesus is mentioned. Most scholars and theologions agree, that was an interpolation.
angelo is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 04:50 AM   #272
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by angelo atheist
You obviously have studied nothing about the history of the zodiac and ancient cosmological language. But I'm not going to enlighten you on this thread.
Heh. That looked suspiciously similar to something Dave said... then I saw that it was what Dave said (quote-tag glitch).

Still, it gives me an excuse to re-address this. Dave, if you had ever bothered to read 1 Enoch (and if you had any understanding of basic astronomy), you'd know that the system of gates was devised to solve a real-world astronomical problem with the Hebrew sky-dome cosmology: seasonal variation in the rising and setting points of the Sun and Moon on the horizon. It was, in fact, the Hebrew equivalent of the medieval "epicycles" you mentioned earlier.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 05:45 AM   #273
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
Default

A CRITIQUE OF DEAN'S DIVISION OF THE FLOOD STORY
Dean gave an example yesterday of how the Documentary Hypothesis divides the Flood Story in the Book of Genesis here ... http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...35#post4812235.

Dean concludes thusly ...
Quote:
That each of these stories stands alone with fluent narrative and with a distinct style that survives the translation into English should be obvious to everyone.

This is what Dave characterises as "mutilating" the text.
Yes, I do because your apparent basis for separating the text in the way that you do seems to be your assumption of "Occidental thinking" applied to Oriental literature. This is a faulty basis IMO and there is a better basis for a different division in the Tablet Theory. So yes, to assume an occidental viewpoint and arbitrarily apply this to oriental literature is indeed 'mutilation.'

ASSUMPTIONS ARE EVERYTHING, BUT DEAN IS IGNORING THEM
Assumptions are those hidden "little" things that scholars make, but often don't talk about which make an enormous difference on the outcome of their study. A common assumption I harp about a lot is the assumption of closed systems in rock which scientists attempt to date radiometrically. Assumptions are also made about initial quantities of parent and daughter products in these rocks. In Carbon 14 dating, it is assumed that the Flood of Noah is a fictional or local event and thus the concentration of Carbon 14 in the biosphere has been relatively constant for hundreds of thousands of years needing only relatively minor corrections provided by calibration curves. But if these assumptions are wrong, then results of studies are radically different.

Literature studies are no different in this respect. They also are subject to the assumptions of the investigator. I have listed 5 assumptions of the originators of the Documentary Hypothesis as follows ...
Quote:
DOCUMENTARY PRESUPPOSITIONS
1) Priority of source analysis over archaeology
2) Natural view of Israel's religion and history
3) No writing in Israel at Moses' time
4) Legendary view of the patriarchal narratives
5) Antisupernaturalism
These are the presuppositions which motivated the theorists to come up with the DH in the first place. Had the DH theorists been theorizing 50 years later, when the new archaeological finds were very well known, the Documentary Hypothesis would have never seen the light of day. Incidentally, my initial claim that precipitated this debate was not that the DH was wrong (it is, but that was not my claim). My claim was that all the presuppositions which gave rise to the DH have been refuted. They have, so my mission is accomplished. But this is fun, so I will continue. But no Dean, I don't have all these original sources assembled yet. That will take much time and I have many subjects I am interested in.

Now Dean says that none of this stuff about presuppositions matters and he is wrong. It matters a great deal as I have shown. Dean wants me to just focus on the text itself.

OK, that's fine. Let's focus on the text, and when we do, we find this assumption (a bad one) about occidental thinking made by DH advocates.

APPLYING OCCIDENTAL THINKING TO ORIENTAL WRITING
Dean doesn't come out and say it (unaware of it?), but he unwittingly applies his Western thinking about literature to ancient, oriental text. Gleason Archer writes ...
Quote:
"As foreigners living in an entirely different age and culture, they [the radical critics like Dean] have felt themselves competent to discard or reshuffle phrases or even entire verses whenever their Occidental concepts of consistency or style have been offended.

They have also assumed that scholars living more than 3400 years after the event can (largely on the basis of philosophical theories) more reliably reconstruct the way things really happened than could the ancient authors themselves (who were removed from the events in question by no more than 600 or 1000 years even by the critics own dating)." (McDowell, p. 170)
Gleason Archer is yet another leading scholar critical of the DH. He was a graduate of Harvard University, Suffolk Law School and Princeton Theological Seminary and chaired the Department of Old Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. (See McDowell p. 55)

So in Dean's post yesterday, we find that his "Occidental concepts of consistency and style" have indeed been offended by the traditional understanding of the text. Dean says that "each of these stories stands alone with fluent narrative and with a distinct style" and of course this is true, but misses the point. DH advocates are correct in observing that there should be a division of some sort, but what kind of division is warranted is the real key. The important question is "What basis do you have for separating the text into two accounts?" It appears that your basis is nothing more than your "occidental concepts of consistency and style." And the obvious question is "Why should we apply those concepts to ancient Oriental literature?" and the answer is "We should not." The text can also be separated along the lines of the Tablet Theory and doing so also gives two fluent narratives with consistent styles. What warrant do we have for doing so? Archaeological discoveries. Many tablets which have now (after the rise of the DH) been discovered make use of the same type of "colophon" at the end of the account. Many inscriptions contain repetitive accounts with slightly different perspectives, similar to what we find in the Book of Genesis. (I could post examples upon request)

So the divisions under the Tablet Theory are warranted and supported by archaeology. The divisions of the DH are not. They are arbitrary and biased by the 19th century, occidental viewpoint of the DH promoters.


TABLET THEORY FLOOD STORY DIVISIONS
Let's observe the divisions according to the Tablet theory (I'll put in quotes to set it off, but I'm not actually quoting anyone) ...

Quote:
LAST PORTION OF "ADAM TABLET" (Begins at 2:4b)
...
4:1 ¶ And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
3 ¶ And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD.
4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:
5 But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
6 ¶ And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
7 If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.
8 ¶ And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.
9 ¶ And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?
10 And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground.
11 And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand;
12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.
13 ¶ And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment is greater than I can bear.
14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.
15 And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
16 ¶ And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.
17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.
18 And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech.
19 ¶ And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah.
20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle.
21 And his brother's name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ.
22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah.
23 ¶ And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.
24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.
25 ¶ And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.
26 And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the LORD.
5:1 ¶ This is the book of the generations of Adam. (Toledoth - "signature" of the author - commonly found in ancient tablets)
END OF "ADAM" TABLET






BEGINNING OF "NOAH" TABLET
In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;
2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.
3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:
4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:
5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.
6 ¶ And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos:
7 And Seth lived after he begat Enos eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters:
8 And all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years: and he died.
9 And Enos lived ninety years, and begat Cainan:
10 And Enos lived after he begat Cainan eight hundred and fifteen years, and begat sons and daughters:
11 And all the days of Enos were nine hundred and five years: and he died.
12 And Cainan lived seventy years, and begat Mahalaleel:
13 And Cainan lived after he begat Mahalaleel eight hundred and forty years, and begat sons and daughters:
14 And all the days of Cainan were nine hundred and ten years: and he died.
15 And Mahalaleel lived sixty and five years, and begat Jared:
16 And Mahalaleel lived after he begat Jared eight hundred and thirty years, and begat sons and daughters:
17 And all the days of Mahalaleel were eight hundred ninety and five years: and he died.
18 And Jared lived an hundred sixty and two years, and he begat Enoch:
19 And Jared lived after he begat Enoch eight hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:
20 And all the days of Jared were nine hundred sixty and two years: and he died.
21 ¶ And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah:
22 And Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:
23 And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years:
24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.
25 ¶ And Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years, and begat Lamech:
26 And Methuselah lived after he begat Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, and begat sons and daughters:
27 And all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years: and he died.
28 ¶ And Lamech lived an hundred eighty and two years, and begat a son:
29 And he called his name Noah, saying, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the LORD hath cursed.
30 And Lamech lived after he begat Noah five hundred ninety and five years, and begat sons and daughters:
31 And all the days of Lamech were seven hundred seventy and seven years: and he died.
32 And Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
6:1 ¶ And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 ¶ And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 ¶ There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6 ¶ And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
8 ¶ But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
9 These are the generations of Noah: (Toledoth - "signature" of the author - commonly found in ancient tablets)
END OF "NOAH" TABLET






BEGINNING OF "SONS OF NOAH" TABLET
Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
11 ¶ The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.
12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
13 ¶ And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
14 Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch.
15 And this is the fashion which thou shalt make it of: The length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits.
16 A window shalt thou make to the ark, and in a cubit shalt thou finish it above; and the door of the ark shalt thou set in the side thereof; with lower, second, and third stories shalt thou make it.
17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
18 But with thee will I establish my covenant; and thou shalt come into the ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons' wives with thee.
19 And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female.
20 Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive.
21 And take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten, and thou shalt gather it to thee; and it shall be for food for thee, and for them.
22 ¶ Thus did Noah; according to all that God commanded him, so did he.
7:1 ¶ And the LORD said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation.
2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
3 Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.
4 For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.
5 ¶ And Noah did according unto all that the LORD commanded him.
6 And Noah was six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.
7 And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters of the flood.
8 Of clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clean, and of fowls, and of every thing that creepeth upon the earth,
9 There went in two and two unto Noah into the ark, the male and the female, as God had commanded Noah.
10 And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.
11 ¶ In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.
13 ¶ In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;
14 They, and every beast after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, and every fowl after his kind, every bird of every sort.
15 And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.
16 And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him: and the LORD shut him in.
17 ¶ And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth.
18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.
19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
21 ¶ And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.
24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
8:1 ¶ And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark: and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters asswaged;
2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;
3 And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.
4 ¶ And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.
5 And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.
6 ¶ And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made:
7 And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth.
8 Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground;
9 But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.
10 And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark;
11 And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.
12 And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more.
13 ¶ And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry.
14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.
15 ¶ And God spake unto Noah, saying,
16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee.
17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.
18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him:
19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.
20 ¶ And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.
21 And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.
22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.
9: 1 ¶ And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
2 And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered.
3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
4 But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.
5 And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man.
6 Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
7 And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.
8 ¶ And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying,
9 And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you;
10 And with every living creature that is with you, of the fowl, of the cattle, and of every beast of the earth with you; from all that go out of the ark, to every beast of the earth.
11 And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.
12 ¶ And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations:
13 I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth.
14 And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud:
15 And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh.
16 And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.
17 And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.
18 ¶ And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.
19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.
20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:
21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.
22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.
23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness.
24 ¶ And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
28 ¶ And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years.
29 And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died.
10: 1 ¶ Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. (Toledoth - "signature" of the author - commonly found in ancient tablets)
END OF "SONS OF NOAH" TABLET
So as you can see, with these divisions, we also have a fluent narrative within each tablet with no apparent contradictions in style or any other problems within each tablet.

PLUS ...

We have a warrant for dividing the text in this manner based on archaelogical evidence, not based on subjective bias of 19th Century Western scholars.
Dave Hawkins is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 05:47 AM   #274
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by angelo atheist
You obviously have studied nothing about the history of the zodiac and ancient cosmological language. But I'm not going to enlighten you on this thread.
Heh. That looked suspiciously similar to something Dave said... then I saw that it was what Dave said (quote-tag glitch).

Still, it gives me an excuse to re-address this. Dave, if you had ever bothered to read 1 Enoch (and if you had any understanding of basic astronomy), you'd know that the system of gates was devised to solve a real-world astronomical problem with the Hebrew sky-dome cosmology: seasonal variation in the rising and setting points of the Sun and Moon on the horizon. It was, in fact, the Hebrew equivalent of the medieval "epicycles" you mentioned earlier.
Absolute nonsense. Reveals the "early Hebrews were ignorant of science" bias. But please start a new thread somewhere else to discuss this. This thread is about the Book of Genesis.
Dave Hawkins is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 05:49 AM   #275
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

We have talked a lot about Toledoths and colphons in this thread, but we have never actually looked at what they are.

A colophon is effectively the equivalent of the notes on the dust jacket of a modern book. It is placed at the foot of a tablet, away from the main text - and indicates who wrote the tablet and when.

Here's an example of a colophon from a Babylonian text (an astrological treatise from about 200-190 BCE):

Quote:
Tablet of Anu-b¯elˇsunu, son of Nidinti-Anu, lamentation priest of Anu, descendant of Sˆın-l¯eqiunninni,
the Urukean. Hand of Anu-aba-ut¯er, his son, astronomer. Uruk, month IX, the 14th, year
121, king Antiochus. [. . .] planets [. . .] moon.
It gives the name of the author, the name of the scribe (in this case the author's son) and the date in which the text was written.

Here is an example of a Toledoth from the Bible:

Quote:
These [are] the generations of Shem.
Dave has given us no evidence to show that these should be considered to be the same thing, only assertions.

Given that Colophons are distinct in subject from the text, set apart, and come at the end of the text, we would expect that the Toledoths would also be distinct from the text around them and stand out in the same way.

So what is the context of the one I have just given? Here it is, with the preceding and following text for context (I have not split the text into either paragraphs or even verses, so I can not be accused of splitting the text in a biased manner):

Quote:
So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth. These [are] the generations of Shem. Shem [was] an hundred years old, and begat Arphaxad two years after the flood: And Shem lived after he begat Arphaxad five hundred years, and begat sons and daughters. And Arphaxad lived five and thirty years, and begat Salah: And Arphaxad lived after he begat Salah four hundred and three years, and begat sons and daughters.
Does the Toledoth stand out from the text? No, it fits right in. The text has finished talking about the Tower of Babel, and is changing subject to now give a list of the descendants (i.e. generations) of Shem.

Does the Toledoth give the date of writing and scribal details? No.

Does the Toledoth give the name of the author of the text? No. It gives the subject of the text. It says who's records (or "generations" or "family history", depending on how you want to transliterate Toledoth) they are - not who's "text" or "tablet" or "scroll" it is.

So - should we think that the Toledoth is a colophon for the preceding text? Or should we think that it is an introduction to the following text?

I think that if Dave wishes us to believe the former, then he needs to provide some evidence to back that up...
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 06:00 AM   #276
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 416
Default

And it would be useful for dave to expose his assumptions, given how freely he accuses others of being blinded by theirs.
Regrettably, dave assumes his conclusions, and exposing that would be counter to his purposes...

no hugs for thugs,
Shirley Knott
shirley knott is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 06:00 AM   #277
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
Default

Let's stick with the Flood story for the moment please. The Tablet Theory as stated by Wiseman has some difficulties which are addressed by later authors. I acknowledged this a long time ago and will address it in due course. But none of these difficulties appear in the Flood Story to my knowledge.

You picked the Flood Story and divided it up according to the DH. What basis do you have for doing so? What do you see wrong with the Tablet Theory divsion of the Flood story?
Dave Hawkins is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 06:04 AM   #278
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Dave, I see that you STILL want to duck the fact that the DH "mutilation" makes sense.

And you're still quoting McDowell as an authority, and are now adding Gleason "couldn't find his own butt with both hands" Archer to the list? The guy who famously went to look for Tyre (4th largest town in modern Lebanon), failed to find it, and concluded that it was "underwater"?

But what's especially bizarre is that you've just illustrated the failure of "Tablet theory"!

You have just rejected Noah's Flood.

There was no "Noah's Flood", and Noah never built an Ark: or, if he did, he never bothered to write about them. Nowhere in your "Tablet of Noah" is there a mention of the Ark, or the Flood!

That all gets shunted into the next tablet!

So Noah's contribution ends with a dire but unspecific proclamation... and that's it. A cliifhanger ending that he leaves for his sons to write about!
Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave
So as you can see, with these divisions, we also have a fluent narrative within each tablet with no apparent contradictions in style or any other problems within each tablet.
What we actually have is a catastrophic discontinuity, Dave. It's as if Bill Clinton ended his autobiography with his acceptance of the Democratic nomination and asked Chelsea Clinton to write about the Clinton Presidency.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 06:11 AM   #279
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Absolute nonsense. Reveals the "early Hebrews were ignorant of science" bias. But please start a new thread somewhere else to discuss this. This thread is about the Book of Genesis.
More breathtaking hypocrisy from the guy who's just posted more off-topic garbage about C14 dating - an issue on which you were comprehensively defeated elsewhere (why do the curves agree, Dave?)

But, yes, the Hebrews were ignorant of science. Not just by modern standards, but by the standards of the time: they were still flat-Earthers at a time when others knew that the Earth was round.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 09-26-2007, 06:19 AM   #280
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,395
Default

Dave, you claimed you were here to deal with Dean's points. I note two things: the presuppositions of the originators of the DH are utterly irrelevant to the truth value of the DH.

Second, Dean just eliminated the idea that there are colophons in the Tanakh parallel to those found in other Mesopotamian documents.

Deal with the facts, please.

Oh, and I might not that your claim here:
Quote:
This thread is about the Book of Genesis.
Is also false. This thread is about the DH. So far, you have shown little evidence that you understand what it is, or why your claims are false.
Constant Mews is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.