![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which one of the following sentences is the most probable? | |||
| JC did not exist and JFK was assassinated by a lone gunman | 
		 | 
	6 | 35.29% | 
| JC did not exist and JFK was assassinated by a conspiracy (more than one man involved) | 
		 | 
	5 | 29.41% | 
| JC did exist and JFK was assassinated by a lone gunman | 
		 | 
	6 | 35.29% | 
| JC did exist and JFK was assassinated by a conspiracy (more than one man involved) | 
		 | 
	0 | 0% | 
| Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2002 
				Location: N/A 
				
				
					Posts: 4,370
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2002 
				Location: N/A 
				
				
					Posts: 4,370
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			If you XOR the numeric meaning of the initials with the same for the words "Constantine invented this" in Ethiopic, then it turns into IHS!!!
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: nowhere 
				
				
					Posts: 15,747
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hai mai sentito delle tre ignoranze? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	L'ignoranza agricola: "Non capisco un cavolo." L'ignoranza idraulica: "Non capisco un tubo." E l'ignoranza sessuale: "Non capisco un ...." Non capisco io se fosse un GC, ma so c'era una quarta pallottola.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Falls Creek, Oz. 
				
				
					Posts: 11,192
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 If the God called Jesus was assassinated by a conspiracy involving more than one person then it follows that the Devil Himself is behind it. Why is there not a quest for the historical Devil? I can answer that. PR. It is not something the church wishes to be made known. I have not studied the assassination of JFK, but I know that Gore Vidal refers to it in the closing chapter of his book on the Emperor Julian. The church is unwilling to ask the questions over the death of the Jesus figure in the Jesus story because at the end of the investigation, they will find the Devil Himself in the details behind the scenes. Given the choice of unpleasant truths and comfortable lies, most people will queue all day for the latter. The church has known this since its Nicaean inception.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#15 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2011 
				Location: UK 
				
				
					Posts: 3,057
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#16 | ||
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Falls Creek, Oz. 
				
				
					Posts: 11,192
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 But the Devil Himself (and his sons according to later 5th century reports) was responsible for the conspiracy against the canon-following Christians. It is an historical fact even more sure than the Infant Jeebus was NOT a malevolent trickster wizard, that poor innocent canon-following Christians (not those vile Gnostics) were assassinated by the Devil's agents in the monstrous early persecutions against the flock. Jeebus was not taken out by a lone gunman, was he? Does the Devil have an alibi?  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#17 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2003 
				Location: On the path of knowledge 
				
				
					Posts: 8,889
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |