FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-12-2005, 05:55 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic
The apologist has the date wrong for one thing. Most people date the Assumption of Moses to the middle of the first century or later (although some material is believed to have been written during the Maccabean period, the Herod material is regarded as mid first century redaction.
Just a point on the dating of the Assumption, it was written principally much earlier than the Herodian period, but it was reworked, adding new material about the Hasmoneans and Herod. The text is quite interested in the persecution under Antiochus IV -- not something of interest to a period over 150 years later.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 06:00 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Herod has had 2000 years of bad press. It's only normal that you have to question the sources about him. There's basically nothing of his propaganda left to compare with. Herod, as a loser in history, gets crap from everyone. People in those times did ruthless things. It's not uncommon for people to kill lots of enemies. Alexander Jannaeus killed loads of Pharisees. So what? We only really think of Herod and the fictitious massacre of the innocents -- and innocents here means babies. What has the following to do with babies?

Quote:
Then the fear of him shall be bitter unto them in their land. And he shall execute judgments on them as the Egyptians executed upon them, during thirty and four years, and he shall punish them.

spin
spin is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 11:30 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
What has the following to do with babies?
The question is, what is meant by "as the Egyptians executed upon them"?

The apologist argues that this could be a reference to the story of the Pharaoh killing all the male children of the Hebrews, because he had been warned by an oracle that a Hebrew boy will lead to his downfall.

Do you know what this could be referring to?
Seeker2000 is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 12:19 PM   #14
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seeker2000
The question is, what is meant by "as the Egyptians executed upon them"?

The apologist argues that this could be a reference to the story of the Pharaoh killing all the male children of the Hebrews, because he had been warned by an oracle that a Hebrew boy will lead to his downfall.

Do you know what this could be referring to?
Exodus 1. There was no prophecy that any specific Hebrew boy would be a threat to the pharaoh, Exodus just says that the pharaoh was worried that the Hebrews were multiplying too much. This led o the whole Moses in the bullrushes story...itself a variation on the Sargon myth.



Does anyone know the actual Latin words that are being translated as "executed judgements" or have a link to the Latin online?

For that matter, is there a Hebrew text?
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 07-12-2005, 12:36 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Agree with spin - there's nothing there that suggests the slaughter of young children.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 02-28-2006, 09:37 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 393
Default

I read about Herod in a different context yesterday and then remembered this thread. I re-read it and have some additional thoughts about it, as follows:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic
Does anyone know the actual Latin words that are being translated as "executed judgements" or have a link to the Latin online?
Sorry, I don't know the Latin words, but I have an answer to your other question:

Quote:
For that matter, is there a Hebrew text?
"It is known from a single 6th century manuscript in Latin that was discovered by Antonio Ceriani in the Ambrosian Library in Milan in the mid 19th century and published by him in 1861. Based on the literal translation of idioms within the text, it is generally accepted that the extant Latin version is a translation from Greek, with the Greek itself probably a translation from Hebrew."

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assumption_of_Moses

So it seems that there is no Hebrew text available.

About the question what could be meant by "as the Egyptians executed upon them": Well, I think this could perhaps simply refer to the Exodus story in general. It is said that judgments will be imposed upon them for thirty-four years, which is the duration of Herod's reign. So it rather sounds like the author could be talking about a period of time and not about single events. So maybe he could just refer to the suppression of the Jews in Egypt in general?
Seeker2000 is offline  
Old 02-28-2006, 09:54 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Republic and Canton of Geneva
Posts: 5,756
Default

"And he shall ..." is a future tense, as if The Assumption of Moses was claiming prophecies, but your friend, whilst not claiming supernatural inspiration for it, does think that it's a (within 10 years - in his opinion) reference to an event that had already passed.

So, even if he's right, he would also be claiming/pointing out that 'in those days' people used to write 'prophetic' books after the events they were claiming to be predicting.

And this helps his argument how?
post tenebras lux is offline  
Old 02-28-2006, 09:58 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
Default

I have noted here that Herod was accused being responsibile for the slaughter of innocents in Josephus Wars, only the event happened at the beginning of his career rather than the end.

Jake
jakejonesiv is offline  
Old 02-28-2006, 01:32 PM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by post tenebras lux
"And he shall ..." is a future tense, as if The Assumption of Moses was claiming prophecies, but your friend, whilst not claiming supernatural inspiration for it, does think that it's a (within 10 years - in his opinion) reference to an event that had already passed.

So, even if he's right, he would also be claiming/pointing out that 'in those days' people used to write 'prophetic' books after the events they were claiming to be predicting.

And this helps his argument how?
Well, this is an apocryphal work anyway, so I don't think the apologist has a problem with it containing after the fact prophecies.
Seeker2000 is offline  
Old 02-28-2006, 01:36 PM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakejonesiv
I have noted here that Herod was accused being responsibile for the slaughter of innocents in Josephus Wars, only the event happened at the beginning of his career rather than the end.
I don't really think that this event could be considered the massacre of the innocents. Josephus points out Herod's cruelty in general and names several atrocities he has done. In fact in this quote Josephus is stating that Herod killed everyone and not only the infants. No special significance is given to the infants here.
Seeker2000 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:01 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.