FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2009, 03:40 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There is an amazing amount of inaccurate material, or speculation presented as "probable" or "not improbable" in the NT field. This appears to be part of that vast morass of unsuccessful Christian attempts to make sense of the Bible in Enlightenment terms, as if it were a history on the level of Herodotus.

You can read this in the article:
Quote:
Pilate had no quaestor to conduct the trial, being only a procurator; but examined Jesus himself.

A minute accuracy, confirming the genuineness of the Gospel narrative; also his having his wife with him, Caecina's proposal to enforce the law prohibiting governors to bring their wives into the provinces having been rejected (Tacitus, Ann. 3:33-34).
Unless, of course, Pilate was a prefect, and had to conduct the trial because that was the most dramatic exposition of the myth.

This article on Pilate is from Fausset's Bible Dictionary, which is out of copyright.
Andrew Robert Fausset - Born: 1821; Died: 1910
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.