FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-23-2004, 06:33 AM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Default

As to other historical inaccuracies, the paper reported that one inaccuracy in the torture of Jesus involves guards throwing him off a bridge. That event was purportedly the product of a Nun's dream in the 16th century.
gregor is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 06:56 AM   #42
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Sven:

Just a feeble joke refering to the pages of bandwidth devoted to the use of a comma in another thread. . . .

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 07:48 AM   #43
Bede
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sven
I've seen it several times, it's one of my favourites. You may have a point here - although the emotional aspect has IMHO not much to do with the little bit of discussion of theism vs. atheism included in the movie. It is by all means far less emotional than every Jesus/Bible-movie I've ever seen.

Please tell me what are the scientific problems with this movie, I think I have a fairly trained eye (doing my PhD in theoretical chemistry) and have apparently missed them:
I thought the most powerful moment in the movie was when she meets her dead father and he congratulates her on refusing to believe that he wasn't actually dead (he is an alien in disguise in fact). That is certainly an emotional point against a religious veiw of life after death.

As for the science, well, I majored in physics and found the armwaving over how this giant machine worked most annoying. The impression is given that it builds on rather more real science than it does. Fact is, we have no evidence at all than anything like interdimensional travel is possible. But it is one of the things people often ask me about when they find I did physics.

As for The Passion, the lack of pogroms set off by Jesus Christ Superstar in which the Jews are treated very badly, and where the Sanhedren are actually dressed as modern orthodox Jews, leaves me quite relaxed about this one. Storm in a teacup and all.

B
 
Old 02-23-2004, 08:28 AM   #44
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Doctor X: The thought occured to me that this has something to do with the other thread - but I'm getting cautious because of my apparently very bad English

Quote:
Originally posted by Bede
I thought the most powerful moment in the movie was when she meets her dead father and he congratulates her on refusing to believe that he wasn't actually dead (he is an alien in disguise in fact). That is certainly an emotional point against a religious veiw of life after death.
Hmm. I have to look at this scence again; it never occured to me that this scene was meant as a counter to religious views of an after life.

Quote:
Originally posted by Bede

As for the science, well, I majored in physics and found the armwaving over how this giant machine worked most annoying. The impression is given that it builds on rather more real science than it does. Fact is, we have no evidence at all than anything like interdimensional travel is possible. But it is one of the things people often ask me about when they find I did physics.
OK, this is obviously a scientific problem. But I accepted it as necessary for the plot; the remaining science shown was IMHO very good - far beyond the depiction in any other movie (except 2001 + 2010).
Sven is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 08:32 AM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Massachusetts State Home for the Bewildered
Posts: 961
Default

I expect the effect of The Passion to be similar to all those retreats that many conservative christians regularly go on. The evangelical/fundy folks who see the movie will be "fired up for Christ" for about a week or so. Then they'll go back to being normal (whatever normal is for them, anyway).

So if you have a christian friend who's going to see the movie, avoid them for the 48 hours after the showing and you should be fine.
Beetle is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 09:17 AM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,804
Default

If my memory serves me correctly.
At the end of the book "Contact", Ellie ran out pie to some insane amout of places and found a smiley face or some shit. Not very atheistic if you ask me.
butswana is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 09:49 AM   #47
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by butswana
If my memory serves me correctly.
At the end of the book "Contact", Ellie ran out pie to some insane amout of places and found a smiley face or some shit. Not very atheistic if you ask me.
It was a simple circle. And she had to take the number in the basis of 11 instead of 10 (if my memory serves me correctly). The idea was great (to hid a circle in pi) but you're right: this suggest some greater being behind the cosmos - although Sagan probably wasn't thinking about the Christian God
Sven is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 08:07 PM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 8,650
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sven
This movie is very emotional (see the other posts) and thus persuades people that there's something to Christianity for the wrong reason (I hope this isn't understood wrong - there certainly are good things in the teaching of Jesus, but that's not the point here) - it's kind of difficult to imagine a "pro-atheism movie" which persuades people of atheism on emotional grounds.
I'm writing a script for just such a movie. Granted, it's pretty unlikely it will ever be made, but I can dream, can't I? Anyway, it's a drama/tradgedy about the plight of a recently deconverted fundie, and the atheist who got him started down the path to rationality. The first act covers the emotional aspects of life for the protagonists - an atheist and a fundie - and the atheist's first interactions with the proselytizer. Act two is basically the debates between the atheist and the fundie which leads to deconversion. Not so much emotion there. Just good debate. The third act focuses more on the effects that deconversion has on former-fundie's marriage. That is the crux of the script, and it is a largely emotionally-based, tragic ending. But I don't try to pound my audience over the head, saying "atheism is definitely correct" with the ending. It's left open enough to let viewers decide that separately.

My script is something that would probably bring many freethinkers to tears, and something that could at least soften many a fundie - much like I'm guessing will happen in reversed roles with the "Passion" movie. But there is no shortage of argumentation. The Argument from Evil, Argument from Nonbelief, incompatible properties arguments, biblical criticism, Cosmological Argument, Ontological Argument, Teleological Argument, and more will all be discussed in the second act. Soften the fundies up with the emotional parts of the film, and they just might give the arguments more than a passing glance.

Would I say my script is "pro-atheism"? Not quite. With a little extra tacked onto the end, it would be, though. But I want to leave that for the audience to decide; thus my relatively open ending. (The part at the end of "Signs" where Gibson dons his old priest garb was totally unnecessary, and the movie would have been much better if the audience could have decided for themselves, without the explicit endorsement of religion by Shaylahan and Gibson.) In any case, I wouldn't want my movie advertised as being an atheist movie. It's just a drama that happens to deal with Christianity and atheism on a personal level. Of course, Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell would not see it that way. It would most definitely incur their wrath.

....

My favorite movie is "Donnie Darko". In the audio commentary of the deleted scenes, writer/director Richard Kelly says that the main point of the movie is that the search for God is absurd. So it is supposed to be a pro-agnostic movie. The problem is that that message gets lost in the rest of the movie. God is only briefly mentioned a couple times in the final cut, and not much more when the deleted scenes are added back in. A couple tough questions are raised, such as one on free will, but sufficient answers are not given, and the topic quickly changes. Prior to listening to the director's commentary, it hadn't occurred to me that "Donnie Darko" was a pro-agnostic movie. I thought it was just a good sci-fi/psychological thriller based on schizophrenia and time travel.
Stacey Melissa is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 08:33 PM   #49
SLD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,109
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by butswana
If my memory serves me correctly.
At the end of the book "Contact", Ellie ran out pie to some insane amout of places and found a smiley face or some shit. Not very atheistic if you ask me.
Actually that's not true. It brings up an interesting mathematical philosophy question: given an irrational number such as Pi (and that's not "Pie"!!!! ), isn't it likely that every possible arrangement of numbers is inevitable at some point in it's decimal expansion? That is at some point in the decimal expansion of Pi you are likely to come across the very sequence of digits as Ellie comes across in the book. That and many other strange sequences that would indicate that they were "placed" there. Heck, you would even find the entire KJV in Ascii Code at some point right? Evidence of God? I think not. (unless you came across it really damn early in the sequence)

SLD
SLD is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 01:39 AM   #50
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SLD
Actually that's not true. It brings up an interesting mathematical philosophy question: given an irrational number such as Pi (and that's not "Pie"!!!! ), isn't it likely that every possible arrangement of numbers is inevitable at some point in it's decimal expansion? That is at some point in the decimal expansion of Pi you are likely to come across the very sequence of digits as Ellie comes across in the book. That and many other strange sequences that would indicate that they were "placed" there. Heck, you would even find the entire KJV in Ascii Code at some point right? Evidence of God? I think not. (unless you came across it really damn early in the sequence)
SLD
I have to agree. And when you add that she was not only searching the decimal expansion, but also some others (see my post above), it becomes even more likely that she'll finally find a circle. The likelihood of finding it "early" of course decreases with the size of the circle (number of bits).
Sven is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.