Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-23-2004, 06:33 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
|
As to other historical inaccuracies, the paper reported that one inaccuracy in the torture of Jesus involves guards throwing him off a bridge. That event was purportedly the product of a Nun's dream in the 16th century.
|
02-23-2004, 06:56 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
|
Sven:
Just a feeble joke refering to the pages of bandwidth devoted to the use of a comma in another thread. . . . --J.D. |
02-23-2004, 07:48 AM | #43 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
As for the science, well, I majored in physics and found the armwaving over how this giant machine worked most annoying. The impression is given that it builds on rather more real science than it does. Fact is, we have no evidence at all than anything like interdimensional travel is possible. But it is one of the things people often ask me about when they find I did physics. As for The Passion, the lack of pogroms set off by Jesus Christ Superstar in which the Jews are treated very badly, and where the Sanhedren are actually dressed as modern orthodox Jews, leaves me quite relaxed about this one. Storm in a teacup and all. B |
|
02-23-2004, 08:28 AM | #44 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Doctor X: The thought occured to me that this has something to do with the other thread - but I'm getting cautious because of my apparently very bad English
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-23-2004, 08:32 AM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Massachusetts State Home for the Bewildered
Posts: 961
|
I expect the effect of The Passion to be similar to all those retreats that many conservative christians regularly go on. The evangelical/fundy folks who see the movie will be "fired up for Christ" for about a week or so. Then they'll go back to being normal (whatever normal is for them, anyway).
So if you have a christian friend who's going to see the movie, avoid them for the 48 hours after the showing and you should be fine. |
02-23-2004, 09:17 AM | #46 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,804
|
If my memory serves me correctly.
At the end of the book "Contact", Ellie ran out pie to some insane amout of places and found a smiley face or some shit. Not very atheistic if you ask me. |
02-23-2004, 09:49 AM | #47 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Quote:
|
|
02-23-2004, 08:07 PM | #48 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 8,650
|
Quote:
My script is something that would probably bring many freethinkers to tears, and something that could at least soften many a fundie - much like I'm guessing will happen in reversed roles with the "Passion" movie. But there is no shortage of argumentation. The Argument from Evil, Argument from Nonbelief, incompatible properties arguments, biblical criticism, Cosmological Argument, Ontological Argument, Teleological Argument, and more will all be discussed in the second act. Soften the fundies up with the emotional parts of the film, and they just might give the arguments more than a passing glance. Would I say my script is "pro-atheism"? Not quite. With a little extra tacked onto the end, it would be, though. But I want to leave that for the audience to decide; thus my relatively open ending. (The part at the end of "Signs" where Gibson dons his old priest garb was totally unnecessary, and the movie would have been much better if the audience could have decided for themselves, without the explicit endorsement of religion by Shaylahan and Gibson.) In any case, I wouldn't want my movie advertised as being an atheist movie. It's just a drama that happens to deal with Christianity and atheism on a personal level. Of course, Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell would not see it that way. It would most definitely incur their wrath. .... My favorite movie is "Donnie Darko". In the audio commentary of the deleted scenes, writer/director Richard Kelly says that the main point of the movie is that the search for God is absurd. So it is supposed to be a pro-agnostic movie. The problem is that that message gets lost in the rest of the movie. God is only briefly mentioned a couple times in the final cut, and not much more when the deleted scenes are added back in. A couple tough questions are raised, such as one on free will, but sufficient answers are not given, and the topic quickly changes. Prior to listening to the director's commentary, it hadn't occurred to me that "Donnie Darko" was a pro-agnostic movie. I thought it was just a good sci-fi/psychological thriller based on schizophrenia and time travel. |
|
02-23-2004, 08:33 PM | #49 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,109
|
Quote:
SLD |
|
02-24-2004, 01:39 AM | #50 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|