FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-21-2007, 06:57 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
Yeah, beliefs, not narrative elements. Creeds by defintion involve what one believes, not the narrative that results in the belief.
Who says narrative results in belief? Why should not beliefs lead to a need to teach those beliefs and then the creation of stories to explain those beliefs?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 03-21-2007, 03:43 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Who says narrative results in belief? Why should not beliefs lead to a need to teach those beliefs and then the creation of stories to explain those beliefs?
It's not a matter of who said it, it's what happened.

The gospel is a narrative. It is far from any coherent theology. The creeds are an attempt to "rationalize" the theological beliefs that supposedly flow out of the gospel narrative.

If you're saying that was a mistake, I happen to agree with you. The credalization of Christianity was the worse thing that ever happened to it (who the hell can honestly say they "understand" the trinity, for instance?)

Christianity is at its core a narrative -- the gospel narrative. The creeds are an excrescence on that narrative, with little reference to the narrative itself.
Gamera is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.