FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-21-2009, 02:26 PM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Gday,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblo View Post
John said he was at the crucifixion with the women, Mary Magdalene and the mother of Jesus.
No he didn't.
Which is why you didn't quote any evidence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblo View Post
The disciples witnessed what they believed to be Jesus alive from the dead.
Not one authentic NT writing claims to have met Jesus personally.
Only the forged 2 Peter has a claim to have met Jesus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblo View Post
People were allowed to worship their own gods just as Christians worshiped the God of the Bible, so they weren't killed for worshiping some god, but because they claimed Jesus was seen alive from the dead with their very own eyes.
There are NO authentic claims to have seen Jesus.
Which is why you failed to quote any such claim.


K.
Kapyong is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:27 PM   #52
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 171
Default

John wrote in John he was at the crucifixion. Peter wrote Peter, James wrote James, Matthew wrote Matthew, Paul wrote his epistles, Mark saw Jesus and notes it in Mark and Jude in Jude.

All of it was completed in the first century.
Biblo is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:27 PM   #53
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Biblio - I have to ask this. Are you getting course credit for posting this here? Which seminary?
Toto is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:28 PM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblo View Post
Cephas was one of the Pillars and there is no other original Apostles besides Peter who is called Cephas.
Wrong.
Some early Christian writings have Peter AND Cephas.
Which has been explained to you, but you just keep ignoring the facts.

Preaching your faith, while ignoring the facts - does nothing here.


K.
Kapyong is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:28 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblo View Post
A serious conversation should always come down to a person trying to find a naturalistic explanation to account for the resurrection data, and when they find they are not able to, they inevitibly give their lives to Christ or according to the Bible, shall be resurrected for Hell.
This is backwards. There's no such thing as resurrection, so the naturalistic explanation for such claims is that the witnesses are deluded or dishonest.
bacht is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:30 PM   #56
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 171
Default

Cephas is never thought of as other than Peter. There are not a second set of pillars. Cephas was one of the original 12.
Biblo is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:30 PM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblo View Post
For example, Polycarp knew John and Clement of Rome knew Peter.
Polycarp never mentioned meeting John.
John never mentioned meeting Polycarp.

Clement never mentioned meeting Peter.
Peter never mentioned meeting Clement.

What you have is CLAIMS from LATER believers, not evidence.


K.
Kapyong is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:31 PM   #58
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 171
Default

You can't resurrect naturally, so it must be God.
Biblo is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:31 PM   #59
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 171
Default

Yes Polycarp said he knew John. Clement of Rome Peter. It's all documented.

My favorite book is The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus by Gary R. Habermas.
Biblo is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:32 PM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblo View Post
Nobody is more well documented in antiquity than was Jesus and so closely dated documents to the events.
Rubbish.

We have a vast body of evidence for many people, including statues, coins, first hand accounts, archeology.

We have NOTHING for Jesus.
No evidence at all.

Just stories and claims from believers long after the alleged events.


K.
Kapyong is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.