Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-27-2012, 06:36 AM | #71 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Or indeed ever did any deeds at all. There is every reason to doubt that this story-book character ever existed anywhere at all, other than as a character within highly imaginative and fictional writings. Not one writing about 'him' ever originated with anyone who claimed to have ever personally met or spoke to 'him' in any human form. Your 'Jack and the Beanstalk' Jebus was never a living human being and thus was never tempted, and was never challenged by any real everyday human siuations. True, your imaginary Jebus never sinned, but only because he never even lived. That Islam ever accepted and incorporated this crock of christian mythological crap is by itself, the best reason for rejecting the Islamic mythological crap. |
|
06-27-2012, 08:27 AM | #72 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
|
what is a valid prediction?
Quote:
|
||
06-27-2012, 09:58 PM | #73 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
That's precisely why they incorporated a gnostic gospel account of mythological Jesus and not a canonical gospel account. There is reason to suppose that they knew that the canonical jesus was Fiction Story. Of course they also knew that the Gnostic Jesus was a Fiction Story as well, but the Gnostic Jesus at least had some Greek humour, romance, travel, impossible miracles, etc in his stories, unlike the Roman "gravitas" [SERIOUSNESS] that saturates the Canon Fiction. We only have to read Photius to apperceive how the orthodox canon followers turned their noses up at the Gnostic JOKES. Well, did Judas get switched with Jesus and crucified in his place? Quranic compilers run with Gnostic JOKE: Judas was crucified instead of Jesus. :hysterical: :rolling: Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|