FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2011, 04:45 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Minnesota!
Posts: 386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonA View Post
It's difficult to believe that anyone would consider it true that Jesus rode around anywhere on two animals at once.

The more likely scenario is that Matthew intentionally ignored the artistic literary form in order to make a point that Jesus' 'fulfillment' of Scripture was as literal, precise, and complete as possible.

Jon
Unfortunately, your two sentences seem to contradict themselves.
Not really.

Quote:
You admit that reading the text literally does not make sense, but then you argue that it was written that way (Jesus asking for two donkeys and being seated on them, επανω αυτων 21:7) to make the story available for a peshat interpretation.
That's not what I argued. Here it is again in case you missed it:
[HR="1"]100[/HR]
JonA in Message 5:


Matthew intentionally ignored the artistic literary form in order to make a point that Jesus' 'fulfillment' of Scripture was as literal, precise, and complete as possible.

[HR="1"]100[/HR]
Jon
JonA is offline  
Old 11-17-2011, 07:41 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
No Jiri, just walk on top of it, swampy as it is and thanks for the poem. I know just on poem by Daylan Thomas and like it alot (Do not go gentle into that good night" I think it is called).
Indeed...'rage, rage against the dying of the light !'

Best,
Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 11-17-2011, 07:41 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonA View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post

Unfortunately, your two sentences seem to contradict themselves.
Not really.

Quote:
You admit that reading the text literally does not make sense, but then you argue that it was written that way (Jesus asking for two donkeys and being seated on them, επανω αυτων 21:7) to make the story available for a peshat interpretation.
That's not what I argued. Here it is again in case you missed it:
[HR="1"]100[/HR]
JonA in Message 5:


Matthew intentionally ignored the artistic literary form in order to make a point that Jesus' 'fulfillment' of Scripture was as literal, precise, and complete as possible.

[HR="1"]100[/HR]
Jon
Thanks for the heads-up, Jon !

Best,
Jiri
Solo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.