Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-02-2007, 01:27 AM | #21 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kahaluu, Hawaii
Posts: 6,400
|
|
05-02-2007, 01:40 AM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 96
|
Could be off-topic, but does anyone knows where are the original manuscript of the 4 Gospels and have it even gone through carbon-dating test like the Gospel of Judas did?
|
05-02-2007, 01:55 AM | #23 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
|
05-02-2007, 04:16 AM | #24 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
Julian |
|
05-02-2007, 06:31 AM | #25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
The idea of an 'original manuscript' rather infers something like the modern process of producing a manuscript which is then sent to the printers for dissemination. Once we consider that no such thing was involved, in the era of hand-copying, it becomes obvious that a lot of questions are being begged here. For the "Life of St. Columba" by Adomnan, for instance, there isn't one; Adomnan worked on the text throughout his life and copies were taken at various stages, whenever anyone wanted one. Likewise the idea of a manuscript reflects a written culture. But since most works of the period would have been dictated, possibly to several scribes, this also raises various questions. No authorial manuscript of any ancient literary text exists for any work composed before the 13th century (so Reynolds and Wilson, Scribes and Scholars). All the best, Roger Pearse |
|
05-02-2007, 07:02 AM | #26 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
Note that we do have the originals of various "documentary texts," such as personal letters, contracts, receipts, and other kinds of day-to-day records because they were buried in a trash heap and later excavated. Stephen |
|
05-02-2007, 08:20 AM | #27 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
|
Quote:
I strongly suspect a 'democratization' of biblical studies took place among the Jewish intellectuals with the spread of the Septuagint, with the resulting greater confidence of laity (like Paul) to interpret the texts. This would likely become another spot of friction for cosmopolitan Jews repatriating, or having regular ties, to Palestine. (I am reasoning along the lines of the spread of Protestantism through the vernacular Bibles - of course minus Gutenberg. I.e. Did Paul and Luther have both a highly developped sense of smell when it came to the sociology of the middle classes/lower ranks of nobility- and the psychology of the graphomaniac ?) Has anyone looked at this aspect of literary creativity at the break of the ages ? Much obliged. Jiri |
|
05-02-2007, 10:32 AM | #28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
|
From Catholic Encyclopedia :
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11446b.htm Quote:
|
|
05-02-2007, 10:46 AM | #29 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
I have several of the patristic comments on the original language of Matthew, including the Eusebian account of Pantaenus that Huon alluded to, on one of my web pages. It is far from exhaustive.
Ben. |
05-02-2007, 10:56 AM | #30 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
|
Quote:
Matthew couldn't have been written in Hebrew because it copies directly from Mark. Even if Mark were written in Hebrew and Matthew and Luke copied from Mark in Hebrew, that all of them would have been translated identically is basically impossible. Plus there are many other good linguistic reasons that show that Mark was originally written in Greek, probably by a Latin speaker, same goes for Luke. Since Matthew shares text identically with these, word for word, it too was originally written in Greek. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|